References

• Grum A., North D. W., Williams N. C. The trials and tribulations of the tribnian situation: A pilot level decision analysis of intelligence resource allocation. (1972) . SRI Project MSU-1843, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
• Howard R. A., Matheson J. E., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. Influence diagrams. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (1984/2005a) II(Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, California) 719–763Reprinted, Decision Anal. 2 127–143Google Scholar
• Howard R. A., Matheson J. E. Influence diagram retrospective. Decision Anal. (2005b) 2:144–147Link, Google Scholar
• Matheson J. E., Oliver R. M., Smith J. Q. Using influence diagrams to value information and control. Influence Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analysis (1990) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 25–63Google Scholar
• Matheson J. E., Roths W. J. Decision analysis of space projects: Voyager Mars. (1967/1984) (American Astronautical Society). Presented at the National Symposium Saturn/Apollo and Beyond. Reprinted in R. A. Howard, J. E. Matheson, eds. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, Vol. I. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, California, 445–475Google Scholar
• Miller A. C., Merkhofer M. W., Howard R. A., Matheson J. E., Rice T. R. Development of automated aids for decision analysis. (1976) . SRI Report to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, DARPA Contract MDA 903-74-C0240, Menlo Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
• North D. W., Miller A. C., Braunstein T. Decision analysis of intelligence resource allocation. (1974) . SRI Report DAH C15-73-C-0430, Menlo Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar