Can Stereotype Reactance Prompt Women to Compete? A Field Experiment

References

• Abebe G, Caria S, Fafchamps M, Falco P, Franklin S, Quinn S (2016) Curse of anonymity or tyranny of distance? The impacts of job-search support in urban Ethiopia. NBER Working Paper No. 22409, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• AboveBoard (2023) Tak your career to the next level. Retrieved September 24, https://platform.aboveboard.com/.Google Scholar
• Arslan C, Chang EH, Chilazi S, Bohnet I, Hauser OP (2025) Behaviorally designed training leads to more diverse hiring. Science 387(6732):364–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin J, Sigurdsson SO, Rubin YS (2006) An examination of the effects of delayed versus immediate prompts on safety belt use. Environ. Behav. 38(1):140–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Beale FM (1970) Double Jeopardy: To Be Black and Female (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Beyer S (1990) Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(5):960–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer S, Bowden EM (1997) Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23(2):157–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bosquet C, Combes P, García‐Peñalosa C (2019) Gender and promotions: Evidence from academic economists in France. Scandinavian J. Econom. 121(3):1020–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Kaushik N (2023) Gender differences in responses to competitive organization? A field experiment on differences between STEM and non-STEM fields from an internet-of-things platform. Organ. Sci. 34(6):2119–2142.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) Leaning out: How negative recruitment experiences shape women’s decisions to compete for executive roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):405–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branscombe NR, Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B (1999) The context and content of social identity threat. Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B, eds. Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content (Blackwell Science, Hoboken, NJ), 35–58.Google Scholar
• Brehm JW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bryan CJ, Yeager DS, Hinojosa CP (2019) A values-alignment intervention protects adolescents from the effects of food marketing. Nature Human Behav. 3(6):596–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2024) Can competitiveness predict education and labor market outcomes? Evidence from incentivized choice and survey measures. Rev. Econom. Statist. 1–45.Google Scholar
• Bryan CJ, Yeager DS, Hinojosa CP, Chabot A, Bergen H, Kawamura M, Steubing F (2016) Harnessing adolescent values to motivate healthier eating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(39):10830–10835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr PB, Steele CM (2010) Stereotype threat affects financial decision making. Psych. Sci. 21(10):1411–1416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Collis MR, Kulkarni L (2024) Whether to apply. Management Sci. 70(7):4649–4669.Link, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2004) Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniels DP, Dannals JE, Lys TZ, Neale MA (2025) Do investors value workforce gender diversity? Organ. Sci. 36(1):313–339.Link, Google Scholar
• De Sousa J, Hollard G (2023) From micro to macro gender differences: Evidence from field tournaments. Management Sci. 69(6):3358–3399.Link, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Linos E (2022) RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica 90(1):81–116.Google Scholar
• Eagly AH (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Psychology Press, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Exley CL, Kessler JB (2022) The gender gap in self-promotion. Quart. J. Econom. 137(3):1345–1381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Rubineau B, Kuppuswamy V (2023) Reject and resubmit: A formal analysis of gender differences in reapplication and their contribution to women’s presence in talent pipelines. Organ. Sci. 34(4):1554–1576.Link, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gee LK (2019) The more you know: Information effects on job application rates in a large field experiment. Management Sci. 65(5):2077–2094.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Turban D, Bhawe N (2008) The effect of gender stereotype activation on entrepreneurial intentions. J. Appl. Psych. 93(5):1053–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haegele I (2024) The broken rung: Gender and the leadership gap. Preprint, submitted April 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07750.Google Scholar
• Hall EV, Hall AV, Galinsky AD, Phillips KW (2019) MOSAIC: A model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories. Acad. Management Rev. 44(3):643–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He JC, Kang SK, Lacetera N (2021) Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(42):e2108337118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe E (2023) Fortune 500: Women CEOs run more than 10% of companies for first time. Fortune (January 12), https://fortune.com/2023/01/12/fortune-500-companies-ceos-women-10-percent/.Google Scholar
• Hong SM, Page S (1989) A psychological reactance scale: Development, factor structure and reliability. Psych. Rep. 64(3 Suppl):1323–1326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirgios EL, Silver I, Chang EH (2025) Does communicating measurable diversity goals attract or repel historically marginalized candidates? Evidence from the lab and field. J. Experiment. Psych. General 154(3):624–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knowlton K (2025) Trailblazing motivation and marginalized group members: Changing expectations to pave the way for others. Organ. Sci. 36(1):477–513.Link, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Thompson L, Galinsky A (2001) Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(6):942–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Reb J, Galinsky AD, Thompson L (2004) Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(4):399–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leigh A, Desai SD (2023) What’s race got to do with it? The interactive effect of race and gender on negotiation offers and outcomes. Organ. Sci. 34(2):935–958.Link, Google Scholar
• Leotti LA, Delgado MR (2011) The inherent reward of choice. Psych. Sci. 22(10):1310–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louis WR, Thomas E, Chapman CM, Achia T, Wibisono S, Mirnajafi Z, Droogendyk L (2019) Emerging research on intergroup prosociality: Group members’ charitable giving, positive contact, allyship, and solidarity with others. Soc. Personality Psych. 13(3):e12436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowsky E, Beblo M (2022) When do we observe a gender gap in competition entry? A meta-analysis of the experimental literature. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 198(2022):139–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCoy SK, Major B (2003) Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(8):1005–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinsey (2023) Women in the workplace 2023 report. Retrieved March 27, 2024, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace-2023#/.Google Scholar
• Miron AM, Brehm JW (2006) Reactance theory—40 years later. Zeitschrift Sozialpsychologie 37(1):9–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen H-HD, Ryan AM (2008) Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. J. Appl. Psych. 93(6):1314–1334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petriglieri JL (2011) Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Acad. Management Rev. 36(4):641–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ponce de Leon R, Rosette AS (2022) “Invisible” discrimination: Divergent outcomes for the nonprototypicality of Black women. Acad. Management J. 65(3):784–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberson L, Kulik CT (2007) Stereotype threat at work. Acad. Management Perspect. 21(2):24–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg BD, Siegel JT (2018) A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Sci. 4(4):281–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Ponce De Leon R, Koval CZ, Harrison DA (2018) Intersectionality: Connecting experiences of gender with race at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 38(2018):1–22.Google Scholar
• Samek A (2019) Gender differences in job entry decisions: A university-wide field experiment. Management Sci. 65(7):3272–3281.Link, Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(1):4–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM, Aronson J (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5):797–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triandis HC (2001) Individualism‐collectivism and personality. J. Personality 69(6):907–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2014) The menstrual cycle and performance feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):161–198.Crossref, Google Scholar