NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement

References

• Afuah A. N.Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits (1998) (Oxford University Press, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Afuah A. N. How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):397–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahujah G. Collaboration and innovation: A longitudinal study of interfirm linkages and firm patenting performance in the global advanced material industry. (1996) . Dissertation, University of Michigan Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Amit R., Schoemaker P. J. H. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(1):33–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(1):41–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett S., Konsynski B. Inter-organizational information sharing systems. MIS Quart. (1982) 6(Special Issue):93–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Weber R. Research commentary: Rethinking “diversity” in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):389–399Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A., Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. IT capabilities: A multidimensional operationalization and assessment of links with firm performance. (2000) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
• Bogner W. C., Barr P. S. Making sense in hypercompetitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):212–226Link, Google Scholar
• Bower J.Managing the Resource Allocation Process (1970) (Harvard University, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Brandenburger A. M., Stuart H. W. Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. & Management Strategy. (1996) 5(1):5–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P.The Social Life of Information (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrnes N., Judge P. C. Internet anxiety: Part in envy, part in fear, corporate America is embracing a radically new business model. Bus. Week (1999) . (June 28)Google Scholar
• California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Clark C., Cavanaugh N., Brown C. V., Sambamurthy V. Building change-readiness capabilities in the IS organization: Insights from the Bell Atlantic experience. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(4):425–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook T. D., Campbell D. T.Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings (1979) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. Strategic supremacy through disruption and dominance. Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 40(3):127–135Google Scholar
• Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ.Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Drucker P. F.Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices (1974) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Dubin R.Theory Building (1978) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10/11):1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G. Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. 13th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems. (1992) (Dallas, TX)195–206Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G., Zmud Robert W. The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. Framing the Domains of ITManagement Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past (2000) (Pin-naflex Educational Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G., Kemerer C. F. The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(3):255–275Link, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Forrester J. W.Industrial Dynamics (1961) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Giddens A.Central Problems in Social Theory (1979) (MacMillan Press, London, U.K.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grove A. S.Only the Paranoid Survive (1996) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(1):47–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalakota R., Oliva R. A., Donath B. Move over, e-commerce. Marketing Management (1999) 8(3):22–32Google Scholar
• Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P.The Balanced Scorecard (1996) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L. The value of Internet commerce to the customer. Management Sci. (1999) 45(1):533–542Link, Google Scholar
• King John L., Kraemer Kenneth L. Evolution and organizational information systems: An assessment of Nolan's stage model. Comm. ACM (1984) 27(5):466–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspective. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(4):319–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A. S. Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(4):342–364Link, Google Scholar
• Lengnick-Hall C. A., Wolf J. A. Similarities and contradictions in the core logic of three strategy research streams. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(12):1109–1132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(Summer Special Issue):111–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Lippman S. A., Rumelt R. P. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J.Econom. (1982) 13(2):418–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Robey D. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. (1988) 34(5):583–598Link, Google Scholar
• Mata F. J., Fuerst W. L., Barney J. B. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):487–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):159–78Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Configurations revisited. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(7):505–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr L. B.Explaining Organizational behavior (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Moore G. A.Living on the Fault Line (2000) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222Link, Google Scholar
• Moore J. F.The Death of Competition (1996) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Nonaka H. Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company. (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novak T. P., Hoffman D. L. New metrics for new media: Toward the development of web measurement standards. World Wide Web J. (1997) 2(1):213–246Google Scholar
• Special Issue on Organizational LearningOrgan. Sci. (1991) 2(1):1–148Link, Google Scholar
• Paré G., Elam J. J., Lee A. S., Liebunau J., DeGross J. L. Using case study research to build theories of IT implementation. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.) 70–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Advantage (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(6):61–78Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(3):79–91Google Scholar
• Priem R. L., Butler J. E. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(1):22–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayport J. F., Jaworski B. J.e-Commerce (2001) (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
• Rindova V. P., Fombrun C. J. Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(8):691–710Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1962) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Zmud Robert W. Business strategy in hypercompetitive environments: Re-thinking the role of IT differentiation. Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past (2000) (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. (2001) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Straub D. W., Watson R., Dickson G. W., DeSanctis G. Managing IT in the digital era. Information Technology and the Future Enterprise: New Models for Managers (2000) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Shaw T., Jarvenpaa S. L., Lee A. S., Liebunau J., DeGross J. L. Process models in information systems. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.) 70–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh K., Mitchell W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Summer Special Issue):99–115Google Scholar
• Smith H. Jeff, Milberg S. J., Burke S. J. Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart.20(2):167–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart T. A.Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations (1997) (Bantam, New York)Google Scholar
• Storey V. C., Straub D. W., Stewart K. A., Welke R. J. A conceptual investigation of the electronic commerce industry. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(7):117–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D. W., Klein R. e-Competitive transformations. Bus.Horizons (2001) 44(3):3–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D. W., Watson R. Transformational issues in researching IS and net-enabled organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):337–345Link, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities andstrategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuitiesand organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. Nothing quite so practical as a good theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):486–489Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N., Henderson J. C. Real strategies for virtualorganizing. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 40(1):33–48Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Weill P., King J. L., Nolan R. L. The Nolan stage model: A debate. (1991) Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. Inform. SystemsNew York:398Google Scholar
• Weill P., Vitale M. R.Place to Space: Migrating to eBusiness Models (2001) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(2):171–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(12):1087–1108Crossref, Google Scholar
• PushWired (1997) 5(3Google Scholar
• Woodruff R. B. Customer Value: The next source for compet-itive advantage. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1997) 25(2):139–153Crossref, Google Scholar