Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.151.88

References

  • Adams D., Nelson R., Todd P. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):227–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alba J., Lynch J., Weitz B., Janiszewski C., Lutz R., Sawyer A., Wood S. Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic markets. J. Marketing (1997) 61(3):38–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alpar P., Porembski M., Pickerodt S. Measuring the efficiency of Web site traffic generation. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce. (2001) 6(1):53–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alwin D.Sociological Methodology (1974) 79–1051973–1974Google Scholar
  • Anderson J., Gerbing D. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(3):411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong A., Hagel J. The real value of online communities. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(3):134–141Google Scholar
  • Babbie E.The Practice of Social Research (1992) 6th ed.(Belmont, CA)Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi R.Causal Methods in Marketing (1980) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. An examination of the validity of two models of attitude. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1981) July16:323–359CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. A holistic methodology for modeling consumer response to innovation. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(1):128–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barki H., Hardwick J. Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(1):59–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney D. e-Comm intelligence report. Network World (2000) 17(9):56–57Google Scholar
  • Berry J.Internetweek (1999) October 4):38Google Scholar
  • Berthon P., Pitt L., Watson R. Marketing communication and the World Wide Web. Bus. Horizons (1996) 39(5):24–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boling E. Usability testing for Web sites. Learning for the global community. (1995) Seventh Annual Hypermedia Conf.Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  • Bort J. Web tracking tools chart Internet ROI. Software Magazine (1997) 17(8):65–67Google Scholar
  • Boudreau M., Gefen D., Straub D. Validation in IS research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buschke L. The basics of building a great Web site. Training & Development (1997) 51(7):46–48Google Scholar
  • Campbell D. Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct trait, discriminant validity. Amer. Psychologist (1960) August15:546–553CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D., Fiske D. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. (1959) 56(2):81–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlson J., Zmud R. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chain Store Age Web-based retailers tell disparate tales at NRF. Chain Store Age (1997) February):45–52Google Scholar
  • Churchill G. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16:64–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psych. Measurement (1960) 20:37–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J. B. Too many hands in the cookie jar? Amer. Advertising (1997) 13(2)–22Google Scholar
  • Cook T., Campbell D.Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (1979) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika (1951) 16(3):297–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R., Lengel R. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–571LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R., Lengel R., Trevino L. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quart. (1987) 17:355–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D'Ambra J., Rice R. Multimethod approaches for the study of computer-mediated communication, equivocality, and media selection. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (1994) 37(4):231–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W., McLean E. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A., Kinney S. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):256–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dickson P. Understanding the trade winds: The global evolution of production consumption, and the Internet. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27:115–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donabedian B., McKinnon S., Bruns W. Task characteristics, managerial socialization, and media selection. Management Comm. Quart. (1998) 11(3):372–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellsworth J., Ellsworth M.The Internet Business Book (1994) (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY) Google Scholar
  • El-Shinnawy M., Markus M. Acceptance of communication media in organizations: Richness or features? IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (1998) 41(4):242–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans P., Wurster T.Blown to Bits. (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fenton N. Software measurement—A necessary scientific basis. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1994) 20(3):199–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D., Boudreau M. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. AIS (2000) 7(7):1–78Google Scholar
  • Gordon M., Slade L., Schmitt N. The “Science of the Sophomore” revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(1):191–207Google Scholar
  • Griffith D., Palmer J. Leveraging the Web for corporate success. Bus. Horizons (1999) January-February):3–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith D., Krampf R., Palmer J. The role of interface in electronic commerce: Consumer involvement with print versus online catalogs. Internat. J. Electronic Comm. (2001) 5(4):135–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho J. Evaluating the World Wide Web: A global study of commercial sites. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1997) 3(1). 〈 www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/ho.htmlCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman D., Novak T. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. J. Marketing (1996) 60(3):50–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman D., Novak T., Chatterjee P. Commercial scenarios for the Web: Opportunities and challenges. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1995) 1(3). 〈 www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue3/hoffman.htmlCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang W., Watson R., Wei K. K. Can a lean e-mail medium be used for rich communication? A psychological perspective. Euro. J. Inform. Systems (1998) 7(4):269–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S., Todd P. Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (1997) 1(2):59–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson R., Wichern D.Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (1998) (Prentice Hall, New York) Google Scholar
  • Landis J., Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics (1977) 22:79–94Google Scholar
  • Lederer A., Maupin D., Sena M., Zhuang Y. The role of ease of use, usefulness and attitude in the predication of World Wide Web usage. (1998) Proc. 1998 ACM SIGCPR conf.March 26–28Boston, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levi M., Conrad F. A heuristic evaluation of a World Wide Web prototype. Interactions (1996) 3(4):1–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine R. Guide to Web style. (1996) . 〈 http://Web.sun.com/style-guide/tables/welcome.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Machlis S. Quick study: Cookies are a marketer's dream but do they watch too closely? Computerworld (1998a) 32(28)–25Google Scholar
  • Machlis S. Site redesigns keepit simple. Computerworld (1998b) 32(43):43–44Google Scholar
  • Markus M. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:502–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McQuarrie E., Munson J., Sherry John F., Sternthal Brian. A revised product involvement inventory: Improved usability and validity. Advances in Consumer Research (1991) 19(The Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT) Google Scholar
  • Messmer E. Internet holiday shopping stresses online toy stores. Network World (1999) 16(49)–6Google Scholar
  • Munch J., Boller G., Swasy J. The effects of argument structure and affective tagging on product attitude formation. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(2):294–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neely A.Measuring Business Performance (1998) (Profile Books Ltd., London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Niccolai J. Web-analysis tools can measure more than a site's success. Info World (1997) 19(14):62Google Scholar
  • Nielsen J.Usability Engineering (1993) (Morgan Kaufmann, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen J.Designing Web Usability (2000) (New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN) Google Scholar
  • Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Palmer J. Retailing on the WWW: The use of electronic product catalogs. Internat. J. Electronic Markets (1997) 7(3):6–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer J., Griffith D. An emerging Web site design model for marketing. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(3):44–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearrow M.Web Site Usability (2000) (Charles River Media, Rockland, MA) Google Scholar
  • Petty R., Cacioppo J. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1979) 37(9):1915–1926CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Picarille L. PointCast proposes Web-hit yardstick. Comput. Reseller News (1997) 757:85Google Scholar
  • Pitkow J., Kehoe C. Emerging trends in the WWW user population. Comm. ACM (1996) 39(6):106–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Price M. What makes users revisit a Web site? Marketing News (1997) March 17):12Google Scholar
  • Przystupa F., Glanville R., de Zeeuw G. Interactive interfaces between collective support systems and their users. Interactive Interfaces and Human Networks (1993) (Amsterdam, North Holland)85–96Google Scholar
  • Radosevich L. Fixing Web-site usability. Info World (1997) 19(50):81–82Google Scholar
  • Randall D. Consumer strategies for the Internet: Four scenarios. Long Range Planning (1997) 30(2):157–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rasmussen J. Design with the user in mind and you can't go awry. Comput. Canada (1996) 22(25):47–48Google Scholar
  • Rice R. Task analyzability use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(4):475–500LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Comm. Res. (1993) 19:451–484CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R., D'Ambra J. Cross-cultural comparison of organizational media evaluation and choice. J. Comm. (1998) 48(3):3–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R., Shook D. Relationships of job categories and organizational levels to use of communication channels, including electronic mail: A meta-analysis and extension. The J. Management Stud. (1990) 27(2):195–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice D., Hughes R., Love G. Usage and outcomes of electronic messaging at an R&D organization: Situational constraints, job level, and media awareness. Inform. Tech. & People (1989) 5(2):141–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose G., Straub D. The effect of download time on consumer attitude toward the e-Service retailer. e-Service J. (2001) 1(1):55–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose G., Khoo H., Straub D. Current technological impediments to business-to-consumer electronic commerce. Comm. AIS (1999) 1(16):1–74Google Scholar
  • Ross D. Electronic communications: Do cultural dimensions matter? Amer. Bus. Rev. (2001) 19(2):75–81Google Scholar
  • Schmitz J., Fulk J. Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail—A test of the social influence model of technology use. Comm. Res. (1991) 18:487–523CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schonberg T., Hoch R., Podlaseck M., Spraragen S. Measuring success. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(8):53–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schubert P., Selz D. Web assessment: A model for the evaluation and the assessment of successful electronic commerce applications. (1998) Proc. 31st Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci.HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  • Selz D., Schubert P. Web assessment: Some evidence from successful interactive WWW applications. Internat. J. Electronic Markets (1997) 7(3):1–4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Shneiderman B.Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (1998) (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley) Google Scholar
  • Smith H., Milberg S., Burke S. Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):167–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spool J.Web Site Usability: A Designers Guide (1997) (User Interface Engineering (UIE), San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Stone M.L. Server logs helpshape Web strategies. Advertising Age's Bus. Marketing (1999) 84(1):19–20Google Scholar
  • Straub D. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(2):147–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Karahanna E. Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. (1997) 9(2):160–175LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Watson R. Research commentary: Transformational issues in researching IS and net-enabled organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):337–345LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8)–1342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Suh K. Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory. Inform. & Management (1999) 35(8):295–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Took R., Harrison M., Thimbleby H. Putting design into practice: Formal specification and the user interface. Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) 82–96Google Scholar
  • Trevino L., Lengel R., Daft R. Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interac-tionist perspective. Comm. Res.14(5):553–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trevino L., Lengel R., Bodensteiner W., Gerloff E., Muir N. The richness imperative and cognitive style. Management Comm. Quart. (1990) 4:176–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Umesh I., Peterson R., Sauber M. Interrespondent agreement and the maximum value of Kappa. Educational and Psych. Measurement (1989) 49:835–850CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson T. Service keeps tabs on partner sites. Internet week(September 13):780Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.