Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.168.84

References

  • Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24:665–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(3):557–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., De P., Sinha A. Comprehending objectand process models: An empirical study. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1999) 25:541–556CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V., Stair R. The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy: An empirical assessment. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11:418–430LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blatt L. A., Knutson J. F., Nielsen J., Mack R. L. Interface design guidance systems. Usability Inspection Methods (1994) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 351–384Google Scholar
  • Bollen K.Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K., Lennox K. R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110:305–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breitenbach C. S., Van Doren D. C. Value-added marketing in the digital domain: Enhancing the utility of the Internet. J. Consumer Marketing (1998) 15:558–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T. Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, discriminant validity. Amer. Psychologist (1960) 15:546–553CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T., Fiske D. W. Convergentand discriminantvalidation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. (1959) 56:81–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card S. K., Moran T. P., Newell A.The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction (1983) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Chau P. Y. K., Au G., Tam K. Y. Impact of information presentation modes on online shopping: An empirical evaluation of a broadband interactive shopping service. J. Organ. Comput. lectronic Commerce (2000) 10:1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole M., O'Keefe R. M., Siala H. From the user interface to the consumer interface. Inform. Systems Frontiers (2000) 1:349–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook T. D., Campbell D. T.Quasi Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (1979) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Day G. S. Managing marketrelationships. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2000) 28:45–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H. M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:269–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dwyer D. J., Fox M. L. The moderating role of hostility in the relationship between enriched jobs and health. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eighmey J., McCord L. Adding value in the information age: Uses and gratifications of sites on the World-Wide Web. J. Bus. Res. (1998) 41:187–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gehrke D., Turban E. Determinants of successful Web site design: Relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness. (1999) Proc. 31st Hawaii Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems(Maui, HI)Google Scholar
  • Gray W. D., Salzman M. C. Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Human-Computer Interaction (1998) 13:203–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hawkins D. I., Best R. J., Coney K. A.Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy (1995) (Richard D. Irwin, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. J. Marketing (1996) 60:50–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P. How to acquire customers on the Web. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78:179–184Google Scholar
  • Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P., Chatterjee P. Commercial scenarios for the Web: Opportunities and challenges. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1995) 1Google Scholar
  • Jeffries R. J., Miller J. R., Wharton C., Uyeda K. M. User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. (1991) Proc. CHI on Human Factors in Comput. Systems.(New Orleans, LA, ACM, New York) 119–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kantner L., Rosenbaum S. Usability studies of WWW sites: Heuristic evaluation vs. laboratory testing. (1997) Proc. SIGDOC(Snowbird, UT)153–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karat J. Evolving the scope of user-centered design. Comm.ACM (1997) 40:33–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katerattanakul P., Siau K., De P., DeGross J. Measuring information quality of Web sites: Development of an instrument. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1999) (Charlotte, NC)279–285Google Scholar
  • Keeker K. Improving Web-site usability and appeal: Guidelines compiled by MSN usability research. (1997) . 〈 〈http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnsiteplan/html/improvingsiteusa.asp〉Google Scholar
  • Keevil B. Measuring the usability index of your Web site. (1998) Sixteenth Annual ACM Internat. Conf. Comput. DocumentationSeptember, 24-26Quebec, Canada:271–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein L. R. Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: Search versus experience goods. J. Bus. Res. (1998) 41:195–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam J. C. Y., Lee M. K. O. A model of Internet consumer satisfaction: Focusing on the Web-site design. (1999) Proc. 5th Amer. Conf. Inform. Systems(Milwaukee, WI)526–528Google Scholar
  • Lecerof A., Paterno F. Automatic support for usability evaluation. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1998) 24:863–887CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lohse G., Spiller P. Internet retail store design: How the user interface influences traffic and sales. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1999) 5Google Scholar
  • Mack R. L., Nielsen J., Nielsen J., Mack R. L. Executive summary. Usability Inspection Methods (1994) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 1–24Google Scholar
  • Modahl M.Now or Never: How Companies Must Change Today to Win the Battle for Internet Customers (2000) (Harper Collins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Moore G., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2:192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1985) (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Nielsen J., Nielsen J., Mack R. L. Heuristic evaluation. Usability Inspection Methods (1994) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 25–62Google Scholar
  • Nielsen J.Designing Web Usability (2000) (New Riders, Indianapolis IN) Google Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Olsson C. The usability concept reconsidered: A need for new ways of measuring real Web use. Proc. IRIS 23 (2000) (Laboratorium for Interaction Technology, University of Trollhättan Uddevalla)Google Scholar
  • Payne S. J., Squibb H., Howes A. The nature of device models: The yoked state hypothesis and some experiments with text editors. Human-Comput. Interaction (1990) 5:415–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peppers D., Rogers M.Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age (1999) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Polson P. G., Lewis C., Ripman J., Wharton C. Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evaluation of use interfaces. Internat. J. Man-Machine, Stud. (1992) 36:741–773CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shneiderman B.Software Psychology: Human Factors in Computer and Information Systems (1980) (Winthrop, Cambridge MA) Google Scholar
  • Shneiderman B.Designing the User Interface (1998) 3rd ed.(Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sime M. E., Green T. G., Guest D. J. Psychological evaluation of two conditional constructions used in programming languages. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1973) 5:105–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D. Validating Instruments in MIS Research. MIS Quart. (1989) 13:147–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Watson R. Transformational issues in researching IS and net-enabled organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12:337–345LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Subramaniam C., Shaw M. J., Gardner D. M. Productmarketing and channel management in electronic commerce. Inform. Systems Frontiers (2000) 1:363–379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11:342–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sci. (1996) 27:451–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46:186–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Speier C. Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2000) 52:991–1005CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N., Grant J. H. Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11:71–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Ho H. Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. Data Base for the Adv. Inform. Systems (1997) 28:63–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wharton C., Rieman J., Lewis C., Polson P., Nielsen J., Mack R. L. The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. Usability Inspection Methods (1994) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 105–140Google Scholar
  • Wixon D., Jones S., Tse L., Casady G., Nielsen J., Mack R. L. Inspections and design reviews: Framework, history, and reflection. Usability Inspection Methods (1994) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 77–104Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.