Price Salience and Product Choice

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2020.1261

References

  • Backus M , Blake T , Tadelis S (2019) On the empirical content of cheap-talk signaling: An application to bargaining. J. Political Econom. 127(4):1599–1628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blake T , Coey D (2014) Why marketplace experimentation is harder than it seems: The role of test-control interference. Proc. 2014 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (ACM, New York), 567–582.Google Scholar
  • Blake T , Nosko C , Tadelis S (2016) Returns to consumer search: Evidence from eBay. Proc. 2016 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. EC17:531–545.Google Scholar
  • Bordalo P , Gennaioli N , Shleifer A (2013) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J , Hossain T , Morgan J (2010) Shrouded attributes and information suppression: Evidence from the field. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):859–876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E , Smith MD (2001) Consumer decision-making at an Internet shopbot: Brand still matters. J. Indust. Econom. 49(4):541–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chetty R , Looney A , Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Lit. 47(2):315–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dertwinkel-Kalt M , Köster M , Sutter M (2019) To buy or not to buy? Shrouding and partitioning of prices in an online shopping field experiment. Working paper 7475, CESifo, Munich.Google Scholar
  • Ellison G (2005) A model of add-on pricing. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):585–637.Google Scholar
  • Ellison G , Ellison SF (2009) Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the Internet. Econometrica 77(2):427–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman NE , Ruffle BJ (2015) The impact of including, adding, and subtracting a tax on demand. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 7(1):95–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein A (2009) E-z tax: Tax salience and tax rates. Quart. J. Econom. 124(3):969–1010.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X , Laibson D (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information supression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree MS (2008) Limited information and advertising in the U.S. personal computer industry. Econometrica 76(5):1017–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenleaf EA , Johnson EJ , Morowitz VG , Shalev E (2016) The price does not include additional taxes, fees, and surcharges: A review of the research on partitioned pricing. J. Consumer Psych. 26(1):105–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heidhues P , Kőszegi B (2018) Behavioral industrial organization. Bernheim B , DellaVigna S , Laibson D , eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations , vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 517–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hossain T , Morgan J (2006) … Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non) equivalence in field experiments on eBay. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy 6(2):1–30.Google Scholar
  • Lynch JGJ , Ariely D (2000) Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, distribution. Marketing Sci. 19(1):83–103.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monroe KB (1973) Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. J. Marketing Res. 10(1):70–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morowitz VG , Greenleaf EA , Johnson ET (1998) Divide and prosper: Consumers’ reactions to partitioned prices. J. Marketing Res. 35(4):453–463.Google Scholar
  • Osborn K (2015) Why StubHub is tacking on ticket fees again. Money (September 1), https://money.com/stubhub-fees-all-in-ticket-prices/.Google Scholar
  • Seim K , Vitorino MA , Muir DM (2017) Drip pricing when consumers have limited foresight: Evidence from driving school fees. Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • Smith E (2015) StubHub gets out of all-in pricing. Wall Street Journal (August 31), https://www.wsj.com/articles/stubhub-gets-out-of-all-in-pricing-1441065436.Google Scholar
  • Taubinsky D , Rees-Jones A (2018) Attention variation and welfare: Theory and evidence from a tax salience experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(4):2462–2496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.