Digitization and Flexibility: Evidence from the South Korean Movie Market

References

• Abraham S, Sun L (2018) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Preprint, submitted May 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3158747.Google Scholar
• Aguiar L, Waldfogel J (2018) Quality predictability and the welfare benefits from new products: Evidence from the digitization of recorded music. J. Political Econom. 126(2):492–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C (2004) The long tail. Wired 12(10):170–177.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens G (2018) Design-based analysis in difference-in-differences settings with staggered adoption. Preprint, submitted August 5, https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05293.Google Scholar
• Bar-Isaac H, Caruana G, Cuñat V (2012) Search, design, and market structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):1140–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belton J (2012) Introduction: Digital cinema. Film History: Internat. J. 24(2):131–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Goolsbee A (2002) Does the Internet make markets more competitive? Evidence from the life insurance industry. J. Political Econom. 110(3):481–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Smith MD (2000) Frictionless commerce? a comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. 46(4):563–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D (2011) Goodbye Pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.Link, Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2019) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Preprint, submitted March 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3148250.Google Scholar
• Caoui EH (2021) Estimating the costs of standardization: Evidence from the movie industry. Accepted, Rev. Econom. Stud., https://elhadicaoui.github.io/files/standardization.pdf.Google Scholar
• Cinedigm (2005) New Sony Pictures agreement with Christie/AIX supports digital cinema transition. Accessed January 11, 2019, http://investor.cinedigm.com/news-releases/news-release-details/new-sony-pictures-agreement-christieaix-supports-digital-cinema.Google Scholar
• de Chaisemartin C, d’Haultfoeuille X (2019) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. NBER Working Paper No. 25904, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filson D, Switzer D, Besocke P (2005) At the movies: The economics of exhibition contracts. Econom. Inquiry 43(2):354–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleder D, Hosanagar K (2009) Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Sci. 55(5):697–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2017) Digital economics. NBER Working paper No. 23684, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2018) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. NBER Working Paper No. 25018, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Lerner J, Stern S (2013) Digitization, innovation, and copyright: What is the agenda? Strategic Organ. 11(1):110–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han S (2018) Identification in nonparametric models for dynamic treatment effects. Preprint, submitted May 23, https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09397.Google Scholar
• Hanssen FA (2002) Revenue-sharing in movie exhibition and the arrival of sound. Econom. Inquiry 40(3):380–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hull P (2018) Estimating treatment effects in mover designs. Preprint, submitted April 18, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06721.Google Scholar
• Husak W (2004) Economic and other considerations for digital cinema. Signal Processing Image Comm. 19(9):921–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• KOFIC (2016) Annual report of the Korean movie market. Technical report, Korean Film Council, Busan, South Korea.Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Times (1999) In a first, “Phantom Menace” to be screened in digital. (June 4), http://articles.latimes.com/1999/jun/04/business/fi-44024.Google Scholar
• Lowe K (2012) Cinema's digital takeover: The decline and fall of film as we have known it. Deadline (February 4), www.deadline.com/2012/02/cinemas-digital-takeover-the-decline-and-fall-of-film-as-we-have-known-it-208772/.Google Scholar
• Mondello B (2017) Step inside a movie projection booth to see what’s changed since film. National Public Radio (July 18), http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/The-Digital-Economy-2012.pdf.Google Scholar
• Orhun AY, Venkataraman S, Chintagunta PK (2015) Impact of competition on product decisions: Movie choices of exhibitors. Marketing Sci. 35(1):73–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Rao A, Hartmann WR (2015) Quality vs. variety: Trading larger screens for more shows in the era of digital cinema. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(2):117–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Revkin AC (1999) Showing in theaters: The digital revolution; Cinemas test a projector prototype that makes spools of film obsolete. New York Times (July 3), https://www.nytimes.com/1999/07/03/nyregion/showing-theaters-digital-revolution-cinemas-test-projector-prototype-that-makes.html.Google Scholar
• Rossi PE (2014) Even the rich can make themselves poor: A critical examination of iv methods in marketing applications. Marketing Sci. 33(5):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Roy AD (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Econom. Papers 3(2):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Ed. Psych. 66(5):688–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders P (2008) Digital cinema gains support. Wall Street Journal (October 2), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122283741314593631.Google Scholar
• Silver J, Alpert F (2003) Digital dawn: A revolution in movie distribution? Bus. Horizons 46(5):57–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spulber DF (1996) Market microstructure and intermediation. J. Econom. Perspect. 10(3):135–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strezhnev A (2018) Semiparametric weighting estimators for multi-period difference-in-differences designs. Presentation, American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, September 1, American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Vivarelli N (2015) Report: Almost 90 percent of the planet’s movie screens are now digital. Variety (February 6), http://variety.com/2015/film/global/report-almost-90-percent-of-the-planets-movie-screens-are-now-digital-exclusive-1201426239.Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2016) Cinematic explosion: New products, unpredictability and realized quality in the digital era. J. Indust. Econom. 64(4):755–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J, Reimers I (2015) Storming the gatekeepers: Digital disintermediation in the market for books. Inform. Econom. Policy 31(June):47–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinstein M (1998) Profit-sharing contracts in Hollywood: Evolution and analysis. J. Legal Stud. 27(1):67–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zettelmeyer F, Morton FS, Silva-Risso J (2006) How the Internet lowers prices: Evidence from matched survey and automobile transaction data. J. Marketing Res. 43(2):168–181.Crossref, Google Scholar