Estimation of Preference Heterogeneity in Markets with Costly Search

References

• Ackerberg DA (2009) A new use of importance sampling to reduce computational burden in simulation estimation. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(4):343–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby GM, Rossi PE (1999) Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econometrics 89(1):57–78.Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Renault R (1999) Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond model. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):719–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2017) Ordered consumer search. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(5):989–1024.Google Scholar
• Chade H, Smith L (2006) Simultaneous search. Econometrica 74(5):1293–1307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yao S (2017) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 635(12):4345–4365.Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Jain DC, Vilcassim NJ (1991) Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):417–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi M, Dai AY, Kim K (2018) Consumer search and price competition. Econometrica 86(4):1257–1281.Google Scholar
• De Los Santos BI, Hortacsu A, Wildenbeest M (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2009) Do switching costs make markets less competitive? J. Marketing Res. 46(4):435–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE, Vitorino MA (2008) Category pricing with state-dependent utility. Marketing Sci. 27(3):417–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Elberg A, Gardete PM, Macera R, Noton C (2019) Dynamic effects of price promotions: Field evidence, consumer search, and supply-side implications. Quant. Marketing Econom. 17(1):1–58.Google Scholar
• Giulietti M, Waterson M, Wildenbeest M (2014) Estimation of search frictions in the British electricity market. J. Indust. Econom. 62(4):555–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honka E, Chintagunta PK (2017) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the US auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.Link, Google Scholar
• Hotz VJ, Miller RA (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.Link, Google Scholar
• Koulayev S (2014) Search for differentiated products: Identification and estimation. RAND J. Econom. 45(3):553–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM (1993) A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters. J. Marketing Res. 30(2):171–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM (1996) The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. 15(4):321–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Seiler S (2013) The impact of search costs on consumer behavior: A dynamic approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. 11(2):155–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.Link, Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yavorsky D, Honka E, Chen K (2021) Consumer search in the US auto industry: The role of dealership visits. Quant. Marketing Econom. 19(1):1–52.Google Scholar
• Zhou J (2017) Competitive bundling. Econometrica 85(1):145–172.Crossref, Google Scholar