Internalization of Advertising Services: Testing a Theory of the Firm

References

• Afshartous D, Preston RA (2011) Key results of interaction models with centering. J. Statist. Ed. 19(3):1–24.Google Scholar
• Algesheirmer R, Bagozzi RP, Dholakia UM (2018) Key informant models for measuring group-level variables in small groups: Application to plural subject theory. Sociol. Methods Res. 47(2):277–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T, Kramer S (2011) The Progress Principle: Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Anderson E (1985) The salesperson as outside agent or employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Sci. 4(3):234–254.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Schmittlein DC (1984) Integration of the sales force: An empirical examination. RAND J. Econom. 15(3):385–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Weitz BA (1986) Make-or-buy decisions: Vertical integration and marketing productivity. Sloan Management Rev. 27(3):3–19.Google Scholar
• Antras P (2003) Firms, contracts, and trade structure. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1375–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Araghi M, Berndt ER, Davis JC, Silk AJ (2012) the unbundling of advertising agency services. Rev. Marketing Sci. 10(1):4.Google Scholar
• Association of National Advertisers (2012) Industry Groups Urge Marketers to Take Affirmative Steps to Address Online Piracy and Counterfeiting (The Association of National Advertisers, New York).Google Scholar
• Association of National Advertisers (2018) The Continued Rise of the In-House Agency (The Association of National Advertisers, New York).Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Phillips L (1982) Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Admin. Sci. Quart. 32(3):459–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Philips LW (1991) Assessing construct validity in organization research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):421–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Tadelis S (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker GP, Hubbard TN (2004) Contractibility and asset ownership: On-board computers and governance in US trucking. Quart. J. Econom. 119(4):1443–1479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beals D (2007) Trends in Agency Compensation, 14th ed. (Association of National Advertisers, New York).Google Scholar
• Burton J (2009) A Marketer’s Guide to Understanding the Economics of Digital Compared with Traditional Advertising and Media Services (American Association of Advertising Agencies, New York).Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DK (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation via the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. 56(2):81–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica (N.S.) 4(16):386–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costinot A, Oldenski L, Rauch J (2011) Adaptation and the boundary of multinational firms. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(1):298–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Couch A, Keniston K (1960) Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreement response set as a personality variable. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 60(2):151–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dessein W, Galeotti A, Santos T (2016) Rational inattention and organizational focus. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(6):1522–1536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Bergen M, Heide J, John G (1995) Understanding dual distribution: The case of reps and house accounts. J. Law Econom. Organ. 11(1):189–204.Google Scholar
• Evans DS (2008) The economics of the online advertising industry. Rev. Network Econom. 7(3):351–391.Google Scholar
• Evans DS (2009) The online advertising industry: Economics, evolution, and privacy. J. Econom. Perspective 23(3):37–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forbes SJ, Lederman M (2009) Adaptation and vertical integration in the airline industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1831–1849.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geyskens I, Steenkamp J, Noorderhaven N (2006) Make, buy, or ally: A transactions cost theory meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 49(3):519–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2019) Digital economics. J. Econom. Literature 57(1):3–43.Google Scholar
• Goodman LA, Kruskal WH (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 49(December):732–764.Google Scholar
• Grams C (2018) In-house vs. agency branding: 5 benefits of each approach. Accessed June 7, 2021, https://newkind.com/in-house-vs-agency-branding-benefits/.Google Scholar
• Grossman S, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart OD, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1119–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart OD, Moore J (2008) Contracts as reference points. Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland DR (1981) The great tradeoff. Advertising Age 52(1):41–42.Google Scholar
• Horsky S (2006) The changing architecture of advertising agencies. Marketing Sci. 25(4):367–383.Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky S, Michael SC, Silk AJ (2012) The internalization of advertising services: An inter-industry analysis. Rev. Marketing Sci. 10(1):1–37.Google Scholar
• Interactive Advertising Bureau (2019a) Accessed June 7, 2021, www.iab.com/2019-European-programmatic-in-housing.Google Scholar
• Interactive Advertising Bureau (2019b) IAB internet advertising revenue report, 2018 Full year results.Google Scholar
• John G, Weitz BA (1988) Forward integration into distribution: An empirical test of transaction cost analysis. J. Law Econom. Organ. 4(2):337–355.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kivijarvi L (2018) Time spent on advertising daily. Digital News Daily. April 2, Accessed June 7, 2021, http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/316932/time-spent-with-advertising-daily.Google Scholar
• Klaw S (1956) Advertising: The battle of fifteen percent. Fortune 54(October):142.Google Scholar
• Klein S (1989) A transaction cost explanation of vertical control in international markets. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 17(3):253–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolsario C, Vakratss V, Naik P (2020) The anatomy of the advertising budget decisions: How analytics and heuristics drive sales performance. J. Marketing 57(3):468–488.Google Scholar
• Lafontaine F, Slade M (2007) Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. J. Econom. Literature 45(3):629–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ (2003) An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. 24(9):839–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Letang V, Leszega M (2017) U.S. advertising forecast: Executive summary, Magna Global, New York, March.Google Scholar
• Liffreing I (2019) Anheuser-Busch InBev launches in-house agency draft line. AdAge, May 16. Accessed June 7, 2021, https://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/anheuser-busch-inbev-launches-house-agency-draftline/2172236.Google Scholar
• Magna Global (2015) US media forecasts: Methodology and definitions. Accessed June 7, 2021, http://www.magnaglobal.com.Google Scholar
• Maciejovsky B, Wernerfelt B (2011) Costs of implementation: Bargaining costs versus allocative efficiency. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 77(3):318–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Tirole J (1999) Unforeseen contingencies and incomplete contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):83–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matouschek N (2004) Ex post inefficiencies in a property rights theory of the firm. J. Law Econom. Organ. 20(1):125–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteverde K, Teece DJ (1982) Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry. Bell J. Econom. 13(1):206–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C, Day G (2016) Organizing or marketing excellence. J. Marketing 80(6):6–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novak S, Wernerfelt B (2012) On the grouping of tasks into firms: Make-or-buy with interdependent parts. J. Econom. Management Strategy 21(1):53–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiana A (2007) Why do firms both make and buy? An investigation of concurrent sourcing. Strategic Management J. 28(3):285–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips L, Bagozzi R (1986) On measuring organizational properties of distribution channels: Methodological issues in use of key informants. Res. Marketing 8(1):313–369.Google Scholar
• Phillips LW (1981) Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. J. Marketing Res. 18(4):395–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope D (1983) The Making of Modern Advertising (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch A, Heide JB (1997) Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. J. Marketing 61(4):30–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1985) Do markets differ much? Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):341–351.Google Scholar
• Siedler J (1974) On using informants for collecting quantitative data and controlling for measurement error in organization analysis. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 39(6):816–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silk AJ (1971) Response set and the measurement of self-designated opinion leadership. Public Opinion Quart. 35(3):383–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silk AJ, Kalwani M (1982) Measuring influence in organizational purchase decisions. J. Marketing Res. 19(2):165–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silk AJ, King C III (2013) How concentrated is the U.S. advertising and marketing services industry? Myth vs. reality. J. Current Issues Res. Advertising 34(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silk AJ, Stiglin MS (2016) Build it, buy it, or both? Rethinking the sourcing of advertising sources. Internat. J. Marketing Stud. 8(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (1955) United States of America, Plaintiff vs. American Association of Advertising Agencies, Inc.; The American Newspapers Publishers Association, Inc.; Publishers Association of New York City; Associated Business Publications, Inc.; Periodical Publishers Association of America; and Agricultural Publishers Association, Defendants, Civil Action No. 1003.309, May 12, p. 2.Google Scholar
• Wells WD (1961) The influence of yeasaying response style. J. Advertising Res. 1(1):1–12.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1997) On the nature and scope of the firm: An adjustment-cost theory. J. Bus. 70(4):489–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (2015) The comparative advantages of firms, markets, and contracts: A unified theory. Economica 82(326):350–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (2016) Adaptation, Specialization, and the Theory of the Firm: Foundations of the Resource-Based View (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B, Montgomery CA (1988) Tobin’s q and the importance of focus in firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):246–250.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1979) Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. 22(2):233–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wood JP (1958) The Story of Advertising (Ronald Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Woodruff C (2002) Non-contractible investments and vertical integration in the Mexican footwear industry. Internat. J. Industry Organ. 20(8):1197–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar