Modeling Dynamic User Interests: A Neural Matrix Factorization Approach
Published Online:16 Sep 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1293
References
- (2003) E-customization. J. Marketing Res. 40(2):131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014)Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. Preprint, submitted September 1, https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0473.Google Scholar
- (2013) Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 35(8):1798–1828.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) A neural probabilistic language model. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3(Feb):1137–1155.Google Scholar
- (2006) NLTK: The natural language toolkit. Proc. COLING/ACL Interactive Presentation Sessions (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 69–72.Google Scholar
- (2006) Dynamic topic models. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ACM, New York), 113–120.Google Scholar
- (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3(Jan):993–1022.Google Scholar
- (2008) Recommendation systems with purchase data. J. Marketing Res. 45(1):77–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Pooling and dynamic forgetting effects in multitheme advertising: Tracking the advertising sales relationship with particle filters. Marketing Sci. 27(4):659–673.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Sentence-based text analysis for customer reviews. Marketing Sci. 35(6):953–975.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty JD, eds. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 288–296.Google Scholar
- (2015) Dynamic Poisson factorization. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (ACM, New York), 155–162.Google Scholar
- (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 41(6):391.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Modeling dynamic heterogeneity using gaussian processes. J. Marketing Res. 57(1):55–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Multi-view learning of word embeddings via CCA. Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel RS, Bartlett PL, eds. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 199–207.Google Scholar
- (2015) Eigenwords: Spectral word embeddings. J. Machine Learn. Res. 16(1):3035–3078.Google Scholar
- (2012) Two step CCA: A new spectral method for estimating vector models of words. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (Omnipress, Madison, WI), 67–74.Google Scholar
- (2017) Scalable price targeting. NBER Working Paper No. 23775, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (1936) The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika 1(3):211–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Learning preferences with side information. Management Sci. 65(7):3131–3149.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. Gordon G, Dunson D, Dudik M, eds. Proc. Fourteenth Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence Statist. Proc. Machine Learn. Res. vol. 15 (Microtome Publishing, Brookline, MA), 315–323.Google Scholar
- (2011) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Deep Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2015) Scalable recommendation with hierarchical Poisson factorization. Meila M, Hesked T, eds. Proc. Thirty-First Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Arlington, VA), 326–335.Google Scholar
- (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Website morphing. Marketing Sci. 28(2):202–223.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Evaluation of neural architectures trained with square loss vs cross-entropy in classification tasks. Preprint, submitted June 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.07322.Google Scholar
- (2009) Testing behavioral hypotheses using an integrated model of grocery store shopping path and purchase behavior. J. Consumer Res. 36(3):478–493.Google Scholar
- (2014) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Preprint, submitted December 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.Google Scholar
- (2009) Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 447–456.Google Scholar
- (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Comput. 42(8):30–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) A semantic approach for estimating consumer content preferences from online search queries. Marketing Sci. 37(6):930–952.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Online learning for matrix factorization and sparse coding. J. Machine Learn. Res. 11(1):19–60.Google Scholar
- (2016) Mining massive fine-grained behavior data to improve predictive analytics. MIS Quart. 40(4):868–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Why marketing analytics hasn’t lived up to its promise. Harvard Bus. Rev., 1–8.Google Scholar
- (2013a) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Preprint, submitted January 16, https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.Google Scholar
- (2013b) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Burges CJC, Bottou L, Welling M, eds. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 2 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 3111–3119.Google Scholar
- (2008) Probabilistic matrix factorization. Platt JC, Koller D, Singer Y, Rowels ST, eds. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 1257–1264.Google Scholar
- (2003) Buying, searching, or browsing: Differentiating between online shoppers using in-store navigational clickstream. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1-2):29–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Dynamic conversion behavior at e-commerce sites. Management Sci. 50(3):326–335.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Sci. 23(4):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Machine learning: A probabilistic perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2012) Mine your own business: Market-structure surveillance through text mining. Marketing Sci. 31(3):521–543.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Wallach H, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, d'Alché-Buc F, Fox E, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, La Jolla, CA), 8024–8035.Google Scholar
- (2014) Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proc. 2014 Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 1532–1543.Google Scholar
- (2014) Machine learning for targeted display advertising: Transfer learning in action. Machine Learn. 95(1):103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Recommender systems for large-scale e-commerce: Scalable neighborhood formation using clustering. Proc. Fifth Internat. Conf. Comput. Inform. Tech. vol. 1 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 291–324.Google Scholar
- (2013) Characterizing geographic variation in well-being using tweets. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Social Media 7(1):584–591.Google Scholar
- (2001) Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. Leen TK, Dietterich TG, Tresp V, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 556–562.Google Scholar
- (2017) Twitter as a tool for health research: A systematic review. Amer. J. Public Health 107(1):e1–e8.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Identifying customer needs from user-generated content. Marketing Sci. 38(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Crumbs of the cookie: User profiling in customer-base analysis and behavioral targeting. Marketing Sci. 35(3):405–426.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Morphing banner advertising. Marketing Sci. 33(1):27–46.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Temporal collaborative filtering with Bayesian probabilistic tensor factorization. Proc. 2010 SIAM Internat. Conf. Data Mining (SIAM, Philadelphia), 211–222.Google Scholar
- (2019) Search personalization using machine learning. Management Sci. 66(3):1045–1070.Link, Google Scholar

