What Happens When a Retailer Drops a Product Category? Investigating the Consequences of Ending Tobacco Sales

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1299

References

  • Ailawadi KL, Zhang J, Krishna A, Kruger MW (2010) When Wal-Mart enters: How incumbent retailers react and how this affects their sales outcomes. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):577–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DR, Lattin JM (1998) Shopping behavior and consumer preference for store price format: Why “large basket” shoppers prefer EDLP. Marketing Sci. 17(1):66–88.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DR, Ho T-H, Tang CS (1998) Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):352–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blecher E (2008) The impact of tobacco advertising bans on consumption in developing countries. J. Health Econom. 27(4):930–942.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boatwright P, Nunes JC (2001) Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. J. Marketing 65(3):50–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonfrer A, Chintagunta PK, Roberts JH, Corkindale D (2020) Assessing the sales impact of plain packaging regulation for cigarettes: Evidence from australia. Marketing Sci. 39(1):234–252.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borle S, Boatwright P, Kadane JB, Nunes JC, Galit S (2005) The effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Sci. 24(4):616–622.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Briesch RA, Chintagunta PK, Fox EJ (2009) How does assortment affect grocery store choice? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):176–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briesch RA, Dillon WR, Fox EJ (2013) Category positioning and store choice: The role of destination categories. Marketing Sci. 32(3):488–509.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Broniarczyk SM, Hoyer WD, McAlister L (1998) Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. 35(2):166–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Gordon B (2020) Measuring the effectiveness of tobacco bans. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  • Chiang J, Wilcox R (1997) A cross-category analysis of shelf-space allocation, product variety, and retail margins. Marketing Lett. 8(2):183–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CVS Caremark (2014) CVS Caremark to stop selling tobacco at all CVS/pharmacy locations. Press release, CVS Caremark, Woonsocket, RI.Google Scholar
  • Davis P (2006) Spatial competition in retail markets: Movie theaters. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):964–982.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2019) Uniform pricing in U.S. retail chains. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2011–2084.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DePillis L (2013) Why did Whole Foods drop Chobani? Washington Post (December 19), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/12/19/why-did-whole-foods-drop-chobani/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9e70373befb7.Google Scholar
  • Dhar SK, Hoch SJ, Kumar N (2001) Effective category management depends on the role of the category. J. Retailing 77(2):165–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drèze X, Hoch SJ (1998) Exploiting the installed base using cross-merchandising and category destination programs. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 15(5):459–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2010) Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. Internat. J. Management Rev. 12(1):8–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2018) Income and wealth effects on private-label demand: Evidence from the great recession. Marketing Sci. 37(1):22–53.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ellen PS, Mohr LA, Webb DJ (2000) Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? J. Retailing 76(3):393–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman B, Chapman S, Rimmer M (2008) The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction 103(4):580–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2014) Conducting research with quasi-experiments: A guide for marketers. Rotman School of Management Working Paper 2420920, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  • Halonen JI, Kivimäki M, Kouvonen A, Pentti J, Kawachi I, Subramanian S, Vahtera J (2014) Proximity to a tobacco store and smoking cessation: A cohort study. Tobacco Control 23(2):146–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henriksen L, Feighery EC, Schleicher NC, Cowling DW, Kline RS, Fortmann SP (2008) Is adolescent smoking related to the density and proximity of tobacco outlets and retail cigarette advertising near schools? Preventive Medicine 47(2):210–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitsch GJ, Hortacsu A, Lin X (2019) Prices and promotions in US retail markets: Evidence from big data. NBER Working Paper 26306, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2011) Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J. Statist. Software 42(8):1–28. Google Scholar
  • Hu T-W, Sung H-Y, Keeler TE (1995) Reducing cigarette consumption in California: Tobacco taxes vs an anti-smoking media campaign. Amer. J. Public Health 85(9):1218–1222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Illanes G, Moshary S (2017) What is the marginal effect of entry? Evidence from a natural experiment in liquor licensure. Technical report, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  • Khan R, Misra K, Singh V (2015) Will a fat tax work? Marketing Sci. 35(1):10–26.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Ansari A, Gupta S (1999) The “shopping basket”: A model for multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. 18(2):95–114.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N (2007) Investigating consumers’ purchase incidence and brand choice decisions across multiple product categories: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. 26(2):196–217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nagelhout GE, Levy DT, Blackman K, Currie L, Clancy L, Willemsen MC (2012) The effect of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. Findings from the Netherlands SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Simulation Model. Addiction 107(2):407–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nassauer S (2015) Wal-Mart shrinks the big box, vexing vendors. Wall Street J. (October 25), https://www.wsj.com/articles/wal-mart-shrinks-the-big-box-vexing-vendors-1445820469.Google Scholar
  • Newman GE, Gorlin M, Dhar R (2014) When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. J. Consumer Res. 41(3):823–839.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak SP, Reardon SF, Raudenbush SW, Buka SL (2006) Retail tobacco outlet density and youth cigarette smoking: A propensity-modeling approach. Amer. J. Public Health 96(4):670–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osterhus TL (1997) Pro-social consumer influence strategies: When and how do they work? J. Marketing 61(4):16–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozturk OC, Venkataraman S, Chintagunta PK (2016) Price reactions to rivals’ local channel exits. Marketing Sci. 35(4):588–604.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Polinski JM, Howell B, Gagnon MA, Kymes SM, Brennan TA, Shrank WH (2017) Impact of CVS Pharmacy’s discontinuance of tobacco sales on cigarette purchasing (2012–2014). Amer. J. Public Health 107(4):556–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saffer H, Chaloupka F (2000) The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J. Health Econom. 19(6):1117–1137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seetharaman P, Chib S, Ainslie A, Boatwright P, Chan T, Gupta S, Mehta N, Rao V, Strijnev A (2005) Models of multi-category choice behavior. Marketing Lett. 16(3-4):239–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seiler S, Tuchman A, Yao S (2021) The impact of soda taxes: Pass-through, tax avoidance, and nutritional effects. J. Marketing Res. 58(1):22–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):225–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh VP, Hansen KT, Blattberg RC (2010) Market entry and consumer behavior: An investigation of a Wal-Mart supercenter. Allenby GM, ed. Perspectives on Promotion and Database Marketing: The Collected Works of Robert C Blattberg (World Scientific, Singapore), 297–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song I, Chintagunta PK (2006) Measuring cross-category price effects with aggregate store data. Management Sci. 52(10):1594–1609.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stahl K (1982) Differentiated products, consumer search, and locational oligopoly. J. Indust. Econom. 31(1/2):97–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20(4):518–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang K, Goldfarb A (2017) Can offline stores drive online sales? J. Marketing Res. 54(5):706–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y, Lewis M, Singh V (2015) The unintended consequences of countermarketing strategies: How particular antismoking measures may shift consumers to more dangerous cigarettes. Marketing Sci. 35(1):55–72.Google Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B (1994) Selling formats for search goods. Marketing Sci. 13(3):298–309.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Q, Gangwar M, Seetharaman P (2017) Polygamous store loyalties: An empirical investigation. J. Retailing 93(4):477–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ziobro P (2016) Target Corp. culling products in its stores to help resolve out-of-stock issues. Wall Street J. (March 2), https://www.wsj.com/articles/target-corp-culling-products-in-its-stores-to-help-resolve-out-of-stock-issues-1456954473.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.