Measuring Competition for Attention in Social Media: National Women’s Soccer League Players on Twitter

References

• Akpinar E , Berger J (2017) Valuable virality. J. Marketing Res. 54(2):318–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP , de Palma A (2012) Competition for attention in the information (overload) age. RAND J. Econom. 43(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avnit A (2009) The Million Followers Fallacy (Internet Draft - Pravda Media).Google Scholar
• Bakshy E , Hofman JM , Mason WA , Watts DJ (2011) Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on Twitter. Proc. Fourth ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (ACM, New York), 65–74.Google Scholar
• Berger J , Milkman KL (2012) What makes online content viral. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry ST , Levinsohn J , Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry ST , Levinsohn J , Pakes A (2004) Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market. J. Political Econom. 112(1):68–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF (1987) Competition and collusion in the American automobile market: The 1955 price war. J. Indust. Econom. 35(4):457–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF , Reiss PC (1991) Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J. Political Econom. 99(5):977–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha M , Haddadi H , Benevenuto F , Gummadi KP (2010) Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. Proc. Fourth Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Social Media (AAAI, Palo Alto, CA), 10–17.Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK , Dubé JP , Goh KY (2005) Beyond the endogeneity bias: The effect of unmeasured brand characteristics on household level brand choice models. Management Sci. 51(5):832–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Ciliberto F , Tamer E (2009) Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Econometrica 77(6):1791–1828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeVries L , Gensler S , Leeflang PS (2012) Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. J. Interactive Market ing 26(2):83–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrara E , Varol O , Davis C , Menczer F , Flammini A (2016) The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59(7):96–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegerman S (2017) Twitter stock surges on surprise user growth. Accessed May 1, 2021, https://money.cnn.com/2017/04/26/technology/twitter-earnings/index.html.Google Scholar
• Fiegerman S (2018) Facebook users are spending less time on the site. Accessed May 1, 2021, https://money.cnn.com/2018/01/31/technology/facebook-earnings/index.html.Google Scholar
• Fossen BL , Schweidel DA (2017) Television advertising and online word-of-mouth: An empirical investigation of social tv activity. Marketing Sci. 36(1):105–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Goel A , Gupta P , Sirois J , Wang D , Sharma A , Gurumurthy S (2015) The who-to-follow system at twitter: Strategy, algorithms, and revenue impact. J. Appl. Anal. 45(1):98–107.Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A , Petrin A (2004) The consumer gains from direct broadcast satellites and the competition with cable tv. Econometrica 72(2):351–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J (1997) Valuation of New Goods Under Perfect and Imperfect Competition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T , Wiertz C , Feldhaus F (2015) Does Twitter matter? The impact of microblogging word of mouth on consumers’ adoption of new movies. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 43(3):375–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewett K , Rand W , Rust RT , van Heerde HJ (2016) Brand buzz in the echoverse. J. Marketing 80(3):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huberman BA , Romero DM , Wu F (2008) Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday 14(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v14i1.2317.Google Scholar
• Iyer G , Katona Z (2016) Competing for attention in social communication markets. Management Sci. 62(8):2304–2320.Link, Google Scholar
• Joshi JV , Ma L , Rand WM , Raschid L (2013) Building the b[r]and: Understanding how social media drives consumer engagement and sales. MSI Working Paper Series No. 13–113, MSI, New York.Google Scholar
• Kumar A , Bezawada R , Rishika R , Janakiraman R , Kannan P (2016) From social to sale: The effects of firm-generated content in social media on customer behavior. J. Marketing 80(1):7–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A , Tucker C , Wiertz C (2018) Advertising to early trend propagators: Evidence from Twitter. Marketing Sci. 37(2):177–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Le Q , Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. PMLR 32(2):1188–1196.Google Scholar
• Ma L , Sun B , Kekre S (2015) The squeaky wheel gets the grease – An empirical analysis of customer voice and firm intervention on Twitter. Marketing Sci. 34(5):627–645.Link, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P , Packard G , Pattabhiramaiah A (2015) Social dollars: The economic impact of customer participation in a firm-sponsored online customer community. Marketing Sci. 34(3):367–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2001) Measuring market power in ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica 69(2):307–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A , Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandomir R (2015) Women’s World Cup final was most-watched soccer game in United States history. New York Times (July 6), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/07/sports/soccer/womens-world-cup-final-was-most-watched-soccer-game-in-united-states-history.html.Google Scholar
• Toubia O , Stephen A (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Trusov M , Bucklin RE , Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth vs. traditional marketing: Findings from an internet social networking site. J. Marketing. 73(3):90–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood NT , Burkhalter JN (2013) Tweet this, not that: A comparison between brand promotions in microblogging environments using celebrity and company-generated tweets. J. Marketing. Commun. 20(1-2):129–146.Crossref, Google Scholar