Does Gender Matter? The Effect of Management Responses on Reviewing Behavior

References

• Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, Robinson JA (2019) Democracy does cause growth. J. Political Econom. 127(1):47–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayeh JK, Au N, Law R (2013) “Do we believe in TripAdvisor?” Examining credibility perceptions and online travelers’ attitude toward using user-generated content. J. Travel Res. 52(4):437–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3(Jan):993–1022.Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer N, Mitchell P, Weber N (2002) Gender role, organizational status, and conflict management styles. Internat. J. Conflict Management 13(1):78–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown R, Gilman A (1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. Sebeok PA, ed. Style in Language. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 253–276.Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Dover Y, Mayzlin D (2018) Channels of impact: User reviews when quality is dynamic and managers respond. Marketing Sci. 37(5):688–709.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallus J, Bhatia S (2020) Gender, power and emotions in the collaborative production of knowledge: A large-scale analysis of Wikipedia editor conversations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 160:115–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomila R (2019) Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150:700–709.Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2018) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Håkansson J (2012) The use of personal pronouns in political speeches: A comparative study of the pronominal choices of two American presidents. Linnaeus University, Småland, Sweden. Retrieved from https://semanticscholar.org/paper/The-useof-personal-pronouns-in-political-speeches-Håkansson/044a71156a339cdf818817e0b9634ebcf389077.Google Scholar
• Herbert RK (1990) Sex-based differences in compliment behavior 1. Language Soc. 19(2):201–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes J (1988) Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy. J. Pragmatics 12(4):445–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Kim IS, Wang E (2018) Matching methods for causal inference with time-series cross-section data. Working paper, Princeton University.Google Scholar
• Johnson DM, Roen DH (1992) Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: Gender variation. Language Soc. 21(1):27–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kashima Y, Wilson S, Lusher D, Pearson LJ, Pearson C (2013) The acquisition of perceived descriptive norms as social category learning in social networks. Soc. Networks 35(4):711–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Francis ME, Booth RJ (2001) Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Polo FJF (2018) Functions of “you” in conference presentations. English Specific Purposes 49:14–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proserpio D, Zervas G (2017) Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Sci. 36(5):645–665.Link, Google Scholar
• Rambachan A, Roth J (2019) An honest approach to parallel trends. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.Google Scholar
• Scheve K, Stasavage D (2012) Democracy, war, and wealth: Lessons from two centuries of inheritance taxation. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 106(1):81–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seamans R, Zhu F (2014) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of Craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Gelfand M, Babcock L, Gettman H (2007) Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(4):600–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson PS, Hawkins K, Sorenson RL (1995) Gender, psychological type and conflict style preference. Management Comm. Quart. 9(1):115–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tannen D (1991) You Just Don’t Understand. Disch E, ed. (University of Massachusetts, Boston).Google Scholar
• Thomson R, Murachver T (2001) Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British J. Soc. Psych. 40(2):193–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasilescu B, Capiluppi A, Serebrenik A (2012) Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study of StackOverflow. 2012 Internat. Conf. Soc. Informatics (IEEE), 332–338.Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chaudhry A (2018) When and how managers’ responses to online reviews affect subsequent reviews. J. Marketing Res. 55(2):163–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Walther JB, Pingree S, Hawkins RP (2008) Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the internet: Web sites vs. discussion groups. Health Comm. 23(4):358–368.Crossref, Google Scholar