Multiobjective Personalization of Marketing Interventions

References

• Abdolmaleki A, Huang S, Hasenclever L, Neunert M, Song F, Zambelli M, Martins M, Heess N, Hadsell R, Riedmiller M (2020) A distributional view on multi-objective policy optimization. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 11–22.Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Coate S (2005) Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(4):947–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ascarza E (2018) Retention futility: Targeting high-risk customers might be ineffective. J. Marketing Res. 55(1):80–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Wager S (2021) Policy learning with observational data. Econometrica 89(1):133–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S (2019) Generalized random forests. Ann. Statist. 47(2):1148–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Lovett MJ, Boulding W, Staelin R (2012) Optimal admission and scholarship decisions: Choosing customized marketing offers to attract a desirable mix of customers. Marketing Sci. 31(4):621–636.Link, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Dubé J-P, Mela CF (2010) Do digital video recorders influence sales? J. Marketing Res. 47(6):998–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ (1995) What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? J. Advertising Res. 35(1):37–47.Google Scholar
• Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput. 6(2):182–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Mela CF (2018) TV viewing and advertising targeting. J. Marketing Res. 55(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drugan MM, Nowe A (2013) Designing multi-objective multi-armed bandits algorithms: A study. 2013 Internat. Joint Conf. Neural Networks (IJCNN) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–8.Google Scholar
• Dukes A, Liu Q, Shuai J (2022) Skippable ads: Interactive advertising on digital media platforms. Marketing Sci. 41(3):528–547.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferguson S (2023) 8 Ways to increase brand awareness with video in 2023. Accessed February 10, 2023, https://www.wyzowl.com/brand-awareness/.Google Scholar
• Goli A, Reiley DG, Zhang H (2024) Personalized versioning: Product strategies constructed from experiments on pandora. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 6, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0357.Google Scholar
• Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ (1952) A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 47(260):663–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2019) Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of stem career ads. Management Sci. 65(7):2966–2981.Link, Google Scholar
• Marler RT, Arora JS (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 26:369–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGranaghan M, Liaukonyte J, Wilbur KC (2022) How viewer tuning, presence, and attention respond to ad content and predict brand search lift. Marketing Sci. 41(5):873–895.Link, Google Scholar
• Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (2002) On scalarizing functions in multiobjective optimization. OR Spectrum 24:193–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munro E (2024) Treatment allocation with strategic agents. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print March 27, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01629.Link, Google Scholar
• Neyman J (1923) Sur les applications de la théorie des probabilités aux experiences agricoles: Essai des principes. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 10:1–51.Google Scholar
• Nie X, Wager S (2021) Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects. Biometrika 108(2):299–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafieian O (2020) Revenue-optimal dynamic auctions for adaptive ad sequencing. Working paper, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar
• Rafieian O (2023) Optimizing user engagement through adaptive ad sequencing. Marketing Sci. 42(5):910–933.Link, Google Scholar
• Rafieian O, Yoganarasimhan H (2021) Targeting and privacy in mobile advertising. Marketing Sci. 40(2):193–218.Link, Google Scholar
• Rafieian O, Yoganarasimhan H (2023) AI and personalization. Sudhir K, Toubia O, eds. Artificial Intelligence in Marketing, Review of Marketing Research, vol. 20 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 77–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajaram P, Manchanda P, Schwartz EM (2023) Finding the sweet spot: Ad delivery on streaming media. Preprint, submitted April 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3496039.Google Scholar
• Roijers DM, Vamplew P, Whiteson S, Dazeley R (2013) A survey of multi-objective sequential decision-making. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 48:67–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Moe WW (2016) Binge watching and advertising. J. Marketing 80(5):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalit U, Johansson FD, Sontag D (2017) Estimating individual treatment effect: Generalization bounds and algorithms. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 3076–3085.Google Scholar
• Siddarth S, Chattopadhyay A (1998) To zap or not to zap: A study of the determinants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Sci. 17(2):124–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Simester D, Timoshenko A, Zoumpoulis SI (2020a) Efficiently evaluating targeting policies: Improving on champion vs. challenger experiments. Management Sci. 66(8):3412–3424.Link, Google Scholar
• Simester D, Timoshenko A, Zoumpoulis SI (2020b) Targeting prospective customers: Robustness of machine-learning methods to typical data challenges. Management Sci. 66(6):2495–2522.Link, Google Scholar
• Súkeník P, Lampert CH (2022) Generalization in multi-objective machine learning. Preprint, submitted August 29, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13499.Google Scholar
• Sun M, Zhu F (2013) Ad revenue and content commercialization: Evidence from blogs. Management Sci. 59(10):2314–2331.Link, Google Scholar
• Swaminathan A, Joachims T (2015) Counterfactual risk minimization: Learning from logged bandit feedback. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, New York), 814–823.Google Scholar
• Tekin C, Turğay E (2018) Multi-objective contextual multi-armed bandit with a dominant objective. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 66(14):3799–3813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuchman AE, Nair HS, Gardete PM (2018) Television ad-skipping, consumption complementarities and the consumer demand for advertising. Quant. Marketing Econom. 16(2):111–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turgay E, Oner D, Tekin C (2018) Multi-objective contextual bandit problem with similarity information. Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence Statist. (PMLR, New York), 1673–1681.Google Scholar
• Van Moffaert K, Nowé A (2014) Multi-objective reinforcement learning using sets of pareto dominating policies. J. Machine Learn. Res. 15(1):3483–3512.Google Scholar
• Wager S, Athey S (2018) Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 113(523):1228–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Tao L, Zhang XX (2024) Recommending for a multi-sided marketplace: A multi-objective hierarchical approach. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 14, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0238.Google Scholar
• Wang N, Wang H, Karimzadehgan M, Kveton B, Boutilier C (2022) Imo ∧3: Interactive multi-objective off-policy optimization. Raedt LD, ed. Proc. 31st Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI.org), 3523–3529.Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3):356–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2016) Advertising content and television advertising avoidance. J. Media Econom. 29(2):51–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC, Xu L, Kempe D (2013) Correcting audience externalities in television advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(6):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H, Barzegary E, Pani A (2023) Design and evaluation of optimal free trials. Management Sci. 69(6):3220–3240.Link, Google Scholar
• Zufryden FS, Pedrick JH, Sankaralingam A (1993) Zapping and its impact on brand purchase behavior. J. Advertising Res. 33(1):58–67.Google Scholar