Price Competition Under Mixed Multinomial Logit Demand Functions

References

• Aguirregabiria V, Mira P. Swapping the nested fixed point algorithm: A class of estimators for discrete Markov decision models. Econometrica (2002) 70(4):1519–1543Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirregabiria V, Mira P. Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica (2007) 75(1):1–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aksoy-Pierson M, Allon G, Federgruen A. Price competition under mixed multinomial logit demand: The multi-product case. (2010) . Working paper, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
• Allon G, Federgruen A, Pierson M. How much is a reduction of your customers' wait worth? An empirical study of the fast-food drive-thru industry based on structural estimation methods. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2011) 13(4):489–507Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse JF. Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bell DE, Keeney RL, Little JDC. A market share theorem. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 12(2):136–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M. Structure of passenger demand models. (1973) . Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Federgruen A. A general equilibrium model for industries with price and service competition. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(6):868–886Link, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry ST. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(2):242–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand J. Review of “Théorie mathématique de la richesse sociale” and “Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses”. J. des Savants (1883) 68/67:499–508Google Scholar
• Boyd JH, Mellman RE. Effect of fuel economy standards on the U. S. automotive market: An hedonic demand analysis. Transportation Res. (1980) 14(5):367–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E, Bronnenberg B, Russell G, Arora N, Bell D, Devi Duvvuri S, ter Hofstede F, Sismeiro C, Thomadsen R, Yang S. Spatial models in marketing. Marketing Lett. (2005) 16(3–4):267–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Harker PT. Competition and outsourcing with scale economies. Management Sci. (2003) 48(10):1314–1333Link, Google Scholar
• Caplin A, Nalebuff B. Aggregation and imperfect competition: On the existence of equilibrium. Econometrica (1991) 59(1):25–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardell NS, Dunbar FC. Measuring the societal impacts of automobile downsizing. Transportation Res. (1980) 14(5):423–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Wan Y-W. Price competition of make-to order firms. IIE Trans. (2003) 35(9):817–832Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen LR, Jorgenson DW, Lau LJ. Transcendental logarithmic utility functions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1975) 65(3):367–383Google Scholar
• Ciliberto F, Tamer E. Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Econometrica (2009) 77(6):1791–1828Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis P. Spatial competition in retail markets: Movie theaters. (2001) . Working paper, MIT Sloan, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Davis P. Spatial competition in retail markets: Movie theaters. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(4):964–982Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debreu G. Review of RD Luce, Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1960) 50(1):186–88Google Scholar
• Dierker E, Barnett WA, Cornet B, D'Aspremont C, Gabszewicz J, Mas-Colell A. Competition for customers. Equilibrium Theory Appl.: Proc. Sixth Internat. Sympos. Econom. Theory and Econometrics (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 383–402Google Scholar
• Doraszelski U, Pakes A, Armstrong M, Porter RH. A framework for applied dynamic analysis in IO. Handbook of Industrial Organization (2007) Vol. 3(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 1887–1966Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Jindal P. Estimating durable goods adoption decisions from stated choice data. (2011) . Working paper, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE. Do switching costs make markets less competitive? J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(4):435–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Su C-L, Vitorino MA. Multiple equilibria in static empirical pricing games. (2008) . Working paper, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Dubé JP, Chintagunta P, Petrin A, Bronnenberg B, Goettler R, Seetharaman PB, Sudhir K, Thomadsen R, Zhao Y. Structural applications of the discrete choice model. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):207–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N. Symmetric equilibrium existence and optimality in differentiated product markets. J. Econom. Theory (1989) 47(1):178–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feenstra RC, Levinsohn JA. Estimating markups and market conduct with multidimensional product attributes. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1995) 62(1):19–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris M, Judd K, Schmedders K. Solving dynamic games with Newton's method. (2008) . Working paper, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
• Gallego G, Huh WT, Kang W, Phillips R. Price competition with the attraction demand model: Existence of unique equilibrium and its stability. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(4):359–375Link, Google Scholar
• Gonul F, Srinivasan K. Consumer purchase behavior in a frequently bought product category: Estimation issues and managerial insights from a hazard function model with heterogeneity. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1993) 88(424):1219–1227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanson W, Martin K. Optimizing multinomial logit profit functions. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):992–1003Link, Google Scholar
• Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(153):41–57Google Scholar
• Jain DC, Vilcassim NJ, Chintagunta PK. A random-coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1994) 12(3):317–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaskold GJ, Thisse JF. Price competition, quality and income disparities. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 20(3):340–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamakura WA, Russell GJ. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26:379–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg RB. Uniqueness in the Schauder fixed point theorem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. (1976) 60:207–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konovalov A, Sándor Z. On price equilibrium with multi-product firms. Econom. Theory (2009) 44(2):1–22Google Scholar
• Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J. Political Econom. (1966) 74(2):132–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levhari D, Luski I. Duoply pricing and waiting lines. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1978) 11(1):17–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu G. On Nash equilibrium in prices in an oligopolistic market with demand characterized by a nested multinomial logit model and multiproduct firm as nest. (2006) . Discussion paper, Research Department of Statistics, Norway, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
• Luce RD. Individual Choice Behavior (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Luce RD, Suppes P. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Chapter Preferences, Utility and Subject Probability (1965) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Luski I. On partial equilibrium in a queueuing system with two servers. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1976) 43(3):519–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manuszak MD. Firm conduct and product differentiation in the Hawaiian retail gasoline industry. (2000) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• McFadden D. The revealed preferences of a government bureaucracy: Empirical evidence. Bell J. Econom. (1976) 7(1):55–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econometrics (2000) 15(5):447–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meijer E, Rouwendal J. Measuring welfare effects in models with random coefficients. J. Appl. Econometrics (2006) 21(2):227–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica (1990) 58(6):1255–1277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mizuno T. On the existence of a unique price equilibrium for models of product differentiation. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2003) 21(6):761–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A. A practitioners guide to estimation of random coefficients logit models of demand. Econom. Management Strategy (2000) 9(9):513–548Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A. Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica (2001) 69(2):307–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A, Ostrovsky M, Berry ST. Simple estimators for the parameters of discrete dynamic games (with entry/exit samples). RAND J. Econom. (2007) 38(2):373–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peitz M. Aggregation in a model of price competition. J. Econom. Theory (2000) 90(1):1–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peitz M. Price equilibrium in address models of product differentiation: Unit-elastic demand. Econom. Theory (2002) 20(4):849–860Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perloff JM, Salop SC. Equilibrium with product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1985) 52(1):107–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J. Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica (1987) 55(5):999–1033Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM, Adams W. The breakfast cereal industry. The Structure of American Industry (1982) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R. Entry deterrence in the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal industry. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9(2):305–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmedders K, Judd K. A computational approach to proving uniqueness in dynamic games. Comput. Econom. Finance 2005 (2005) . 412, Society for Computational EconomicsGoogle Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnier G, Ainslie A, Otter T. Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(3):313–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steckel JH, Vanhonacker WR. A heterogeneous conditional logit model of choice. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1988) 6(3):391–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri KT, Van Ryzin GJ. The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (2005) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tamer E. Incomplete simultaneous discrete response model with multiple equilibria. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2003) 70(1):147–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomadsen R. Existence of pure strategy equilibria among geographically dispersed firms. Econom. Bull. (2005a) 12(12):1–4Google Scholar
• Thomadsen R. The effect of ownership structure on prices in geographically differentiated industries. RAND J. Econom. (2005b) 36(4):908–929Google Scholar
• Topkis DM. Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train KE, McFadden DL, Ben-Akiva M. The demand for local telephone service: A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18(1):109–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM. Private communication with Awi Federgruen. (2012) Google Scholar
• Vives X. Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Kamakura WA. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2000) Vol. 8(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westin RB. Predictions from binary choice models. J. Econometrics (1974) 2(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar