Implications of Hyperbolic Discounting for Optimal Pricing and Scheduling of Unpleasant Services That Generate Future Benefits

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1673

References

  • Ainslie G. Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Angeletos GM, Laibson D, Repetto A, Tobacman J, Weinberg S. The hyperbolic consumption model: Calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation. J. Econom. Perspect. (2001) 15(3):47–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ault T. (2010) . Interview by Erica L. Plambeck with proprietor of Fort Car Wash, Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin, November 11 and 29Google Scholar
  • Ausubel LM, Shui H. Time inconsistency in the credit card market. (2005) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  • Bendoly E, Donohue K, Schultz K. Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management (2006) 24(6):737–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim BD, Rangel A. Behavioral public economics: Welfare and public policy analysis with non-standard decision-makers. (2005) . NBER Working Paper 11518, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitran GR, Rocha e Oliveira P, Schilkrut A. Managing customer relationships through price and service quality. (2008) . Working paper, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, MadridCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G, Feldman P. Pricing services subject to congestion: Charge per-use fees or sell subscriptions? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2011) 13(2):244–260LinkGoogle Scholar
  • China Commodity Net Analysis of the critical path for developing the hair salon industry. (2009) . Accessed October 2009, http://ccn.mofcom.gov.cn/spbg/show.php?id=9820&ids=Google Scholar
  • Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. $100 bills on the sidewalk: Suboptimal saving in 401(k) plans. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2011) 93(3):748–763CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, Malmendier U. Paying not to go to the gym. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(3):694–718CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duflo E, Kremer M, Robinson J. Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. (2009) . NBER Working Paper 15131, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang H, Silverman D. Time-inconsistency and welfare program participation: Evidence from the NILSY. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2009) 50(4):1043–1077CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40(2):351–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelenbe E, Mitrani I. Analysis and Synthesis of Computer Systems (1980) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gino F, Pisano G. Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(4):676–691LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Giridharan PS, Mendelson H. Free-access policy for internal networks. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(1):1–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R, Haviv M. To Queue or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurn CG. (2011) . Interview by Erica L. Plambeck with proprietor of Kennedy's All-American Barber Club, Orlando, Florida, January 7Google Scholar
  • Johari R, Kumar S. Congestible services and network effects. Proc. 11th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (2010) (ACM, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinrock L. A conservation law for a wide class of queueing disciplines. Naval Res. Logist. (1965) 12(2):181–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):443–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D, Repetto A, Tobacman J. Estimating discount functions with consumption choices over the lifecycle. (2007) . NBER Working Paper 13314, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C, Wu Y. Behavioral operations management. Foundations and Trends Tech., Inform. Oper. Management (2007) 1(3):122–232Google Scholar
  • Madrian BC, Shea DF. The power of suggestion: Intertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(4):297–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science (2004) 306(5695):503–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H, Whang S. Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue. Oper. Res. (1990) 38(5):870–883LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naor P. The regulation of queue size by leaving tolls. Econometrica (1969) 37(1):15–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T, Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89:103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T, Rabin M. Choice and procrastination. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(1):121–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paserman MD. Job search and hyperbolic discounting: Structural estimation and policy evaluation. Econom. J. (2008) 118(531):1418–1452Google Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Wang Q. Hyperbolic discounting and queue-length information management for unpleasant services that generate future benefits. (2012) . Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Prelec D, Loewenstein G. The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):4–28LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Randhawa R, Kumar S. Usage restriction and subscription services: Operational benefits with rational users. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) 10(3):429–447LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Skiba P, Tobacman J. Payday loans, uncertainty and discounting: Explaining patterns of borrowing, repayment, and default. (2008) . Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper 08-33, Vanderbilt Law School, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  • Su X. A model of consumer inertia with applications to dynamic pricing. Production Oper. Management (2009) 18(4):365–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulku S, Dimofte CV, Schmidt GM. Customer valuation of product modularity. (2009) . Working paper, Georgetown University, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Westland S. Congestion and network externalities in the short run pricing of information system services. Management Sci. (1992) 38(7):992–1009LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wu Y, Ramachandran K, Krishnan V. Managing projects with present-biased agents. (2009) . Working paper, National University of Singapore, SingaporeCrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.