Customer-Driven Misconduct: How Competition Corrupts Business Practices

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1680

References

  • Abrams D, Yoon A. The luck of the draw: Using random case assignment to investigate attorney ability. Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. (2007) 74(4):1145–1178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ades A, Di Tella R. Rents, competition, and corruption. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(4):982–993CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P. Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. (2005) 120(2):701–728Google Scholar
  • Amihud Y, Mendelson H. Inventory behavior and market power. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1989) 7(2):269–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Beckman S, Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth BE, Anand V, Staw BM, Kramer RM. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (2003) Vol. 25(Elsevier, Kidlington, UK) 1–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker B, Milbourn T. How did increased competition affect credit ratings? J. Financial Econom. (2011) 101(3):493–514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S. Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry. Econometrica (1992) 60(4):889–917CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Waldfogel J. Product quality and market size. J. Indust. Econom. (2010) 58(1):1–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J. Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(3):529–554CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton P, Freixas X, Shapiro J. The credit ratings game. J. Finance (2012) 67(1):85–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branco F, Villas-Boas M. Competitive vices. (2012) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF, Reiss PC. Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(5):997–1009CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buell R, Campbell D, Frei F. How do incumbents fare in the face of increased service competition? (2011) . HBS Working Paper 11-084, Harvard Business School, BostonCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cai H, Liu Q. Competition and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms. Econom. J. (2009) 119(537):764–795Google Scholar
  • California Bureau of Automotive Repair (2011) . Final statement of reasons for Article 5.5 of Chapter 1 of Division 33 of Title 16 of the California Code of Regulations, June 10 and 13. Accessed January 2012, http://www.bar.ca.gov/80_BARResources/05_Legislative/RegulatoryActions/STAR%20Program%20FSOR_10_28_2011%20Final.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Crosby P. Emissions inspectors plead guilty to violating Clean Air Act. (2011) May 4). Press release, United States Attorney's Office, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta. http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan/press/2011/05-04-11.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Currie J, Walker R. Traffic congestion and infant health: Evidence from E-ZPass. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. (2011) 3(1):65–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Currie J, Neidell M, Schmieder JF. Air pollution and infant health: Lessons from New Jersey. J. Health Econom. (2009) 28(3):688–703CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dafny L, Duggan M, Ramanarayanan S. Paying a premium on your premium? Consolidation in the U.S. health insurance industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2012) 102(2):1161–1185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidson W, Jiraporn P, DaDalt P. Causes and consequences of audit shopping: An analysis of auditor opinion, earnings management, and auditor changes. Quart. J. Bus. Econom. (2006) 45(1):69–87Google Scholar
  • Davis L, Kahn M. International trade in used vehicles: The environmental consequences of NAFTA. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy (2010) 2(4):58–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devinney T. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Perspect. (2009) 23(2):44–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drugov M. Competition in bureaucracy and corruption. J. Development Econom. (2010) 92(2):107–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman BG, Larkin I. Demographics, career concerns or social comparison: Who games SSRN download counts? (2009) . HBS Working Paper 09-096, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • First ResearchAutomotive Repair Shops (2007) (First Research, Austin, TX) Google Scholar
  • Fowlie M, Knittel C, Wolfram C. Sacred cars? Cost-effective regulation of stationary and nonstationary pollution. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy (2012) 4(1):98–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gans N. Customer loyalty and supplier quality competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):207–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garnick DW, Luft HS, Robinson JC, Tetreault J. Appropriate measures of hospital market areas. Health Services Res. (1987) 22(1):69–89Google Scholar
  • Garvin D. What does “product quality” really mean? Sloan Management Rev. (1984) 26(1):25–43Google Scholar
  • Gauderman WJ, Gilliland GF, Vora H, Avol E, Stram D, McConnell R, Thomas D, et al. Association between air pollution and lung function growth in southern California children: Results from a second cohort. Amer. J. Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (2002) 166(1):76–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaynor M. Competition and quality in health care markets. Foundations and Trends in Microeconom. (2006) 2(6). http://www.nowpublishers.com/product.aspx?product=MIC&doi=0700000024CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pierce L. Robin Hood under the hood: Wealth-based discrimination in illicit customer help. Organ. Sci. (2010) 21(6):1176–1194LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gowrisankaran G, Krainer J. Entry and pricing in a differentiated products industry: Evidence from the ATM market. RAND J. Econom. (2011) 42(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg D, Wilson J. USC WebGIS Services. (2012) . Accessed January 2012, https://webgis.usc.eduGoogle Scholar
  • Griliches Z. Price Indexes and Quality Change (1971) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groark V. An overhaul for emissions testing. New York Times (2002) 14CN(June 9):1Google Scholar
  • Guar V, Fisher ML, Raman A. An econometric analysis of inventory turnover performance in retail services. Management Sci. (2005) 51(2):181–194LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hall RE. Reconciling cyclical movements in the marginal value of time and the marginal product of labor. J. Political Econom. (2009) 117(2):281–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrington W, McConnell V. Coase and car repair: Who should be responsible for emissions of vehicles in use? (1999) . Discussion Paper 99-22, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. Accessed January 2012, http://www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-99-22.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Hegarty WH, Sims HP. Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. J. Appl. Psych. (1978) 63(4):451–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosmer LT. Strategic planning as if ethics mattered. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(S2):17–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard TN. An empirical examination of moral hazard in the vehicle inspection market. RAND J. Econom. (1998) 29(2):406–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard TN. How do consumers motivate experts? Reputational incentives in an auto repair market. J. Law Econom. (2002) 45(2):437–468CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Pisano GP. The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2006) 52(4):473–488LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katz E. Bias in conditional and unconditional fixed effects logit estimation. Political Anal. (2001) 9(4):379–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khalil F, Lawaree J. Incentives for corruptible auditors in the absence of commitment. J. Indust. Econom. (2006) 54(2):269–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff G, Galinsky A, Gallo E, Reade J. Whatever it takes: Rivalry and unethical behavior. (2012) . Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P. Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1995) 62(4):515–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knittel C. The implied cost of carbon dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers program. (2009) . Working paper, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  • Kulik B, O'Fallon M, Salimath M. Do competitive environments lead to the rise and spread of unethical behavior? Parallels from Enron. J. Bus. Ethics (2008) 83(4):703–723CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazare D. Jersey weighs its shift to private inspections. New York Times (1980) October 26):S21Google Scholar
  • Leffler K. Ambiguous changes in product quality. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(5):956–967Google Scholar
  • Lieberman MB. The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND J. Econom. (1984) 15(2):213–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyons A, McCarthy M. Transitioning away from smog check tailpipe emission testing in California for OBD II equipped vehicles. (2009) . Mobile Source Control Division, California Air Resources Board. Accessed January 2012, http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/smogcheck/march09/transitioning_to_obd_only_im.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A, Moretti E. Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(1):112–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matsa DA. Competition and product quality in the supermarket industry. Quart. J. Econom. (2011) 126(3):1539–1591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazzeo MI. Competition and service quality in the U.S. airline industry. Rev. Indust. Organ. (2003) 22(4):275–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGahan AM. Cooperation in prices and capacities: Trade associations in brewing after repeal. J. Law Econom. (1995) 38(2):521–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Research CouncilEvaluating Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Programs (2001) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • New York Department of Environmental Conservation 2010 enhanced I/M program annual report. (2011) . Accessed January 2012, http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/76285.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • New York Department of Environmental Conservation NYS motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) programs. (2012) . Accessed January 2012, http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8391.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Obloj T, Sengul M. Incentive life-cycles: Learning and the division of value in firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2012) 57(2):305–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliva P. Environmental regulations and corruption: Automobile emissions in Mexico City. (2012) . Working paper, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  • Olivares M, Cachon GP. Competing retailers and inventory: An empirical investigation of General Motors' dealerships in isolated U.S. markets. Management Sci. (2009) 55(9):1586–1604LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrom E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(3):137–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parasuraman Q, Zeithaml V, Berry L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing (1985) 49(4):41–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L, Snyder J. Ethical spillovers in firms: Evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Management Sci. (2008) 54(11):1891–1903LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce L, Snyder J. Discretion and manipulation by experts: Evidence from a vehicle emissions policy change. B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy (2012) 13(3):1–30Google Scholar
  • Pierce L, Toffel MW. The role of organizational scope and governance in strengthening private monitoring. Organ. Sci. (2013) . ePub ahead of print February 28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0801LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ren CR, Hu Y, Hu Y, Hausman J. Managing product variety and collocation in a competitive environment: An empirical investigation of consumer electronics retailing. Management Sci. (2011) 57(6):1009–1024LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. J. Political Econom. (1974) 82(1):34–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rule S. Carey proposes an auto-exhaust inspection plan. New York Times (1978) June 18):52Google Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Market structure, durability, and quality: A selective survey. Econom. Inquiry (1979) 17(2):177–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider H. Agency problems and reputation in expert services: Evidence from auto repair. J. Indust. Econom. (2012) 60(3):406–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwab B. A note on ethics and strategy: Do good ethics always make for good business? Strategic Management J. (1998) 17(6):499–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwieren C, Weichselbaumer D. Does competition enhance performance or cheating? A laboratory experiment. J. Econom. Psych. (2010) 31(3):241–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked A, Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shleifer A. Does competition destroy ethical behavior? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(2):414–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder JA. Gaming the liver transplant market. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2010) 26(3):546–568CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sosnowski D, Gardetto E. Performing onboard diagnostic system checks as part of a vehicle inspection and maintenance program. (2001) . EPA420-R-01-015, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Accessed January 2012, http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/r01015.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Spence AM. Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell J. Econom. (1975) 6(2):417–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • States News Service Attorney General Martha Coakley reaches settlement with Dorchester auto inspection station and auto inspector. (2009) April 27). http://www.targetednews.com/pr_disp.php?pr_id=2278174Google Scholar
  • States News Service Attorney General Martha Coakley's office files against Haverhill motor vehicle emissions inspector. (2010a) January 27). http://www.mass.gov/ago/news-and-updates/press-releases/2010/ago-files-against-haverhill-motor-vehicle.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • States News Service Somerville auto inspection station and auto inspector will pay $75,000 civil penalty. (2010b) April 22). http://www.mass.gov/ago/news-and-updates/press-releases/2010/somerville-auto-inspection-station-and-auto.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM, Szwajkowski E. The scarcity-munificence component of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20(3):345–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stedman D. Remote sensing: A new tool for automobile inspection and maintenance. (2002) . Accessed January 2012, http://www.feat.biochem.du.edu/assets/reports/Ind_Inst_IM_position_1_2002.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Stedman D, Bishop G, Peddle A. On-road motor vehicle emissions including NH3, SO2 and NO2. (2009) . Final report to the California Air Resources Board. Accessed January 2012, http://www.feat.biochem.du.edu/assets/databases/Cal/Tricity_NH3_SO2_NO2_2008_Report_ARB.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Stevens JM, Steensma HK, Harrison DA, Cochran PL. Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives' decisions. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(2):181–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Syverson C. Market structure and productivity: A concrete example. J. Political Econom. (2004) 112(6):1181–1222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tirole J. Hierarchies and bureaucracies: On the role of collusion in organizations. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1986) 2(2):181–214Google Scholar
  • Utell MJ, Warren J, Sawyer RF. Public health risks from motor vehicle emissions. Annual Rev. Public Health (1994) 15(1):157–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voas S, Shelly P. Ridge kills new emissions tests. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (1995) October 19):A1Google Scholar
  • Weigelt K, Camerer C. Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(5):443–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White LJ. Quality variation when prices are regulated. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. (1972) 3(2):425–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Zitzewitz E. Forensic economics. J. Econom. Literature (2012) 50(3):731–769CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.