The Emergence of Opinion Leaders in a Networked Online Community: A Dyadic Model with Time Dynamics and a Heuristic for Fast Estimation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1685

References

  • Alias-I LingPipe home page. (2008) . Accessed January 23, 2013, http://alias-i.com/lingpipe/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P, Long S, Krauze T. Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1982) 47(5):615–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari A, Koenigsberg O, Stahl F. Modeling multiple relationships in social networks. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(4):713–728CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atchade Y. An adaptive version for the metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm with a truncated drift. Methodology Comput. Appl. Probab. (2006) 8(2):235–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabasi A, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286(5439):509–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonacich P. Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(5):1170–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braun M, Bonfrer A. Scalable inference of customer similarities from interactions data using Dirichlet processes. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(3):513–531LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. The social capital of opinion leaders. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. (1999) 566(1):37–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan K, Misra S. Characteristics of the opinion leader: A new dimension. J. Advertising (1990) 19(3):53–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorogovtsev S, Mendes J. Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DuBay W. The principles of readability. (2004) . Accessed January 23, 2013, http://www.impact-information.com/Google Scholar
  • Fader P, Hardie B, Lee K. RFM and CLV: Using iso-value curves for customer base analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):415–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Gachter S. Fairness and retaliation the economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(3):159–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfel B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. System Res. (2008) 19(3):291–313LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A, Carlin J, Stern H, Rubin D. Bayesian Data Analysis (2003) (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL) Google Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis P. Estimating helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2011) 23(10):1498–1512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis P, Sundarajan A. The dimensions of reputation in electronic markets. (2009) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gladwell M. The Tipping Point (2000) (Little, Brown and Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gould S. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (2002) (Harvard University Press, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. Econometric Analysis (2003) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Handcock M, Raftery A, Tantrum J. Model-based clustering for social networks. J. Royal Statist. Soc. A (2007) 170(2):301–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky C. Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. (2006) 22(2):256–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoff P. Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2005) 100(469):286–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoff P, Raftery A, Handcock M. Latent space approaches to social network analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2002) 97(460):1090–1098CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland P, Leinhardt S. Reply: Some evidence on the transitivity of positive interpersonal sentiment. Amer. J. Sociol. (1972) 77(6):1205–1209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter D, Goodreau S, Handcock M. Goodness of fit of social network models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2008) 103(481):248–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacobucci D, Hopkins N. Modeling dyadic interactions and networks in marketing. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(1):5–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente T. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones J, Handcock M. An assessment of preferential attachment as a mechanism for human sexual network formation. Proc. Royal Soc. (2003) 270(1520):1123–1128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz E, Lazarsfeld P. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (1955) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
  • Katz L, Powell J. Measurement of the tendency towards reciprocation of choice. Sociometry (1955) 18(4):403–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S, Hovy E. Automatic identification of pro and con reasons in online reviews. Annual Meeting of the ACL, Proc. COLING/ACL on Main Conf. Poster Sessions (2006) Sydney, AustraliaCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King C, Summers J. Overlap of opinion leadership across consumer product categories. J. Marketing Res. (1970) 7(1):43–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossinets G, Watts D. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science (2006) 311(5757):88–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu J, Cao Y, Lin C, Huang Y, Zhou M. Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization. Joint Conf. Empirical Methods in NLP and Comput. NLP (2007) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA) 334–342Google Scholar
  • Manski C, Lerman S. The estimation of choice probabilities form choice based samples. Econometrica (1977) 45(8):1977–1988CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D, Yoganarasimhan H. Link to success: How blogs build an audience by promoting rivals. Management Sci. (2012) 58(9):1651–1668LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27(August):415–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton R. The matthew effect in science. Science (1968) 159(3810):56–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mislove A, Marcon M, Gummadi K, Druschel P, Bhattacharjee B. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. Proc. 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conf. on Internet Measurement (2007) (ACM, New York) 29–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers J, Robertson T. Dimensions of opinion leadership. J. Marketing Res. (1972) 9(1):41–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narayan V, Yang S. Modeling the formation of dyadic relationships between consumers in online communities. (2007) . Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Otterbacher J. “Helpfulness” in online communities: A measure of message quality. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factor Comput. Systems (2009) (ACM, New York) 955–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pang B, Lee L. A sentimental education. Annual Meeting ACL. Proc. 42nd Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (2004) Barcelona, SpainCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins G, Snijders T, Wang P, Handcock M, Pattison P. Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Networks (2007) 29(2007):192–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovation (2003) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Snijders T, Pattison P, Robins G, Handcock M. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol. Methodology (2006) 36(1):99–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephen A, Toubia O. Explaining the power-law degree in a social commerce network. Soc. Networks (2009) 31(4):262–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephen A, Dover Y, Muchnik L, Goldenberg J. The effects of transmitter activity and connectivity on information dissemination over online social networks. (2012) . Working paper, University of Pittsburgh, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker C, Zhang J. Growing two-sided networks by advertising the user base: A field experiment. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(5):805–814LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Valente T, Hoffman B, Ritt-Olson A, Lichtman K, Johnson A. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Amer. J. Public Health (2003) 93(11):1837–1843CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Alstyne M, Brynjolfsson E. Global village or cyber-balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):851–868LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C, Joshi Y. New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):400–421LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vernette E. Targeting women's clothing fashion opinion leaders in media planning: An application for magazine. J. Advertising Res. (2004) 44(1):90–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D, Dodds P. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. (2007) 34(4):441–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Z, Varadarajan B. Utility scoring of product reviews. Proc. 15th ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (2006) Arlington, VACrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.