What Are Investors Willing to Pay to Customize Their Investment Product?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1695

References

  • Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Sci. (1964) 9(3):226–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Wise DA. How does simplified disclosure affect individuals' mutual fund choices? Explorations in the Economics of Aging (2011) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 75–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brennan MJ, Solanki R. Optimal portfolio insurance. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1981) 16(3):279–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brünner T, Levínský R, Qiu J. A note on skewness seeking: An experimental analysis. (2007) . Jena Economic Research Paper 2007-079, University of Jena, Jena, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2011) 9(3):522–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein DG, Johnson EJ, Sharpe WF. Choosing outcomes versus choosing products: Consumer-focused retirement investment advice. J. Consumer Res. (2008) 35(3):440–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufmann C, Weber M, Haisley E. The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one's investment risk appetite. Management Sci. (2013) 59(2):323–340LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klos A, Erner C, Steiner M. Presenting distributions: How to mitigate the misperceptions of cost components in long-term saving plans. (2010) . Working paper, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Lopes LL. Risk and distributional inequality. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1984) 10(4):465–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lopes LL. Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1987) 20:255–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitton T, Vorkink K. Equilibrium underdiversification and the preference for skewness. Rev. Financial Stud. (2007) 20(4):1255–1288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morwitz V, Greenleaf EA, Johnson EJ. Divide and prosper: Consumers' reactions to partitioned prices. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(4):453–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nosić A, Weber M. How riskily do I invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence. Decision Anal. (2010) 7(3):282–301LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Johnson EJ. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):643–660LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Unser M. Lower partial moments as measures of perceived risk: An experimental study. J. Econom. Psych. (2000) 21(3):253–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vrecko D, Langer T. Do long-term investors care about inflation? (2010) . Working paper, University of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vrecko D, Klos A, Langer T. Impact of presentation format and self-reported risk aversion on revealed skewness preferences. Decision Anal. (2009) 6(2):57–74LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker PP. Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (2010) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeisberger S, Vrecko D, Langer T. Measuring the time stability of prospect theory preferences. Theory Decision (2012) 72(3):359–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.