Optimal Strategies for Flood Prevention

References

• Aalbers R (2009) Discounting investments in mitigation and adaptation: A dynamic stochastic general equilibrium approach of climate change. CPB Discussion Paper 126, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Ackerman F (2009) Can We Afford the Future? The Economics of a Warming World (Zed Books, London).Google Scholar
• Brekelmans R, den Hertog D, Roos C (2009) Computing safe dike heights: A prototype optimization algorithm. CentER discussion paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Brekelmans RCM, den Hertog D, Roos C, Eijgenraam CJJ (2012) Safe dike heights at minimal costs: The nonhomogeneous case. Oper. Res. 60(6):1342–1355.Link, Google Scholar
• Brunkard J, Namulanda G, Ratard R (2008) Hurricane Katrina deaths, Louisiana, 2005. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness 2008:1–9. DOI: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818aaf55.Google Scholar
• Chahim M, Brekelmans RCM, den Hertog D, Kort PM (2013) An impulse control approach to dike height optimization. Optim. Methods Software 28(3):458–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delta Commissioner (2014) Delta Programme 2015. Accessed March 31, 2016, http://english.deltacommissaris.nl/delta-programme/documents/publications/2014/09/16/delta-programme-2015.Google Scholar
• Delta Committee (2008) Report of the Delta Committee (in Dutch). Accessed March 31, 2016, http://www.deltacommissie.com/doc/2008-09-03%20Advies%20Deltacommissie.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dillingh D, de Haan L, Helmers R, Können GP, van Malde J (1993) De basispeilen langs de Nederlandse kust; statistisch onderzoek (in Dutch). Report DGW–93.023, Dienst Getijdewateren/RIKZ, Rijkswaterstaat, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Eijgenraam CJJ (2005) Veiligheid tegen overstromen: Kosten-baten analyse voor Ruimte voor de Rivier, deel I (in Dutch). CPB Document 82, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Eijgenraam CJJ (2006) Optimal safety standards for dike ring areas. CPB Discussion Paper 62, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Eijgenraam CJJ (2012) Efficient safety standards for dike-ring areas. Technical Report 072, Ministry of Water Resources and Ministry of Environmental Protection, EU-China River Basin Management Programme, Beijing.Google Scholar
• Eijgenraam CJJ, Kind J, Bak C, Brekelmans RCM, den Hertog D, Duits M, Roos C, Vermeer P, Kuijken W (2014) Economically efficient standards to protect the Netherlands against flooding. Interfaces 44(1):7–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Feichtinger G, Hartl RF (1986) Optimale Kontrolle ökonomischer Prozesse. Anwendungen des Maximumprinzips in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften (de Gruyter, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galloway GE, Baecher GB, Plasencia D, Coulton KG, Louthain J, Bagha M, Levy AR (2006) Assessing the adequacy of the national flood insurance program’s 1 percent flood standard. Report, American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Gauderis J, Kind J, Van Duinen R (2013) Robustness of economically efficient flood protection standards: Monte Carlo analysis on top of cost–benefit analysis. Klijn F, Schweckendiek T, eds. Comprehensive Flood Risk Management (Taylor & Francis Group, London), 851–858.Google Scholar
• Katsman CA, Hazeleger W, Drijfhout SS, van Oldenborgh GJ, Burgers G (2008) Climate scenarios of sea level rise for the northeast Atlantic ocean: A study including the effects of ocean dynamics and gravity changes induced by ice melt. Climatic Change 91(3):351–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kind J (2011) Cost–benefit analysis for flood protection in the 21st century (in Dutch). Report 1204144-006-ZWS-0012, Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Kind J (2014) Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. J. Flood Risk Management 7(2):103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manne AS (1961) Capacity expansion and probabilistic growth. Econometrica 29(4):632–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Opperman JJ, Galloway GE, Fargione J, Mount JF, Richter BD, Secchi S (2009) Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers. Science 326(5969):1487–1488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprong T (2008) Attention for safety: Cost estimations. Technical report, Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Stern N (2006) The Stern review: The economics of climate change. Report, HM Treasury, London.Google Scholar
• Syvitski JPM, Kettner AJ, Overeem I, Hutton EWH, Hannon MT, Brakenridge GR, Day Jet al. (2009) Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nature Geoscience 2(10):681–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dantzig D (1956) Economic decision problems for flood prevention. Econometrica 24(3):276–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Noortwijk JM, Kalk HJ, Duits MT, Chbab EH (2002) Bayesian statistics for flood prevention. Technical Report, HKV Consultants and RIZA, Lelystad, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Voortman HG (2002) Risk-based design of large-scale flood defence systems. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Vrijling JK, van Beurden IJCA (1990) Sea level risk: A probabilistic design problem. Edge BL, ed. Proc. 22nd Conf. Coastal Engrg. (American Society of Civil Engineers, New York), 1160–1171.Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (2007) A review of “The Stern review on the economics of climate change”. J. Econom. Literature 45(3):703–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wikipedia (2016) s.v. “Hurricane Sandy,” last modified April 4, 2016, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Sandy#United_States_2.Google Scholar