Optimal Sales Force Compensation in Dynamic Settings: Commissions vs. Bonuses

References

• Ackerberg D, Botticini M (2002) Endogenous matching and the empirical determinants of contract form. J. Political Econom. 110(3):564–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albers S, Mantrala M (2008) Models for sales management decisions. Wierenga B, ed. Handbook of Marketing Decision Models (Springer, Berlin), 163–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu A, Lal VSR, Srinivasan V, Staelin R (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Bellemare C, Shearer B (2010) Sorting, incentives and risk preferences: Evidence from a field experiment. Econom. Lett. 108(3):345–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bierbaum J (2002) Repeated moral hazard under limited liability. Working paper, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2005) Contract Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Che Y-K, Yoo S-W (2001) Optimal incentives for teams. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):525–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Steenburgh T, Sudhir K (2014) Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Marketing Sci. 33(2):165–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Coughlan AT (1993) Salesforce compensation: A review of MS/OR advances. Eliashberg J, Lilien GL, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Marketing, Vol. 5 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 611–651.Google Scholar
• Dai T, Jerath K (2013) Salesforce compensation with inventory considerations. Management Sci. 59(11):2490–2501.Link, Google Scholar
• Dearden JA, Lilien GL (1990) On optimal salesforce compensation in the presence of production learning effects. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 7(2–3):179–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demougin D, Fluet C (1998) Mechanism sufficient statistic in the risk-neutral agency problem. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. 154(4):622–639.Google Scholar
• Hilt E (2008) The negative trade-off between risk and incentives: Evidence from the American whaling industry. Explorations Econom. History 45(4):424–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Innes R (1990) Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices. J. Econom. Theory 52(1):45–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S (2012) Self-control and incentives: An analysis of multiperiod quota plans. Marketing Sci. 31(5):855–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Joseph K, Kalwani M (1998) The role of bonus pay in salesforce compensation plans. Indust. Marketing Management 27(2):147–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaya A, Vereshchagina G (2014) Partnerships versus corporations: Moral hazard, sorting, and ownership structure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):291–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kishore S, Rao R, Narasimhan O, John G (2013) Bonuses versus commissions: A field study. J. Marketing Res. 50(3):317–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kräkel M, Schöttner A (2016) Optimal sales force compensation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 126(Part A):179–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Srinivasan V (1993) Compensation plans for single- and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmstrom–Milgrom model. Management Sci. 39(7):777–793.Link, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (2000) A theory of sales quotas with limited liability and rent sharing. J. Labor Econom. 18(3):405–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poblete J, Spulber D (2012) The form of incentive contracts: Agency with moral hazard, risk neutrality, and limited liability. RAND J. Econom. 43(2):215–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sappington D (1983) Limited liability contracts between principal and agent. J. Econom. Theory 29(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitz P (2005) Allocating control in agency problems with limited liability and sequential hidden actions. RAND J. Econom. 36(2):318–336.Google Scholar
• Schmitz PW (2013) Job design with conflicting tasks reconsidered. Eur. Econom. Rev. 57:108–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simester D, Zhang J (2010) Why are bad products so hard to kill? Management Sci. 56(7):1161–1179.Link, Google Scholar
• Simester D, Zhang J (2014) Why do sales people spend so much time lobbying for low prices? Marketing Sci. 33(6):796–808.Link, Google Scholar
• Steenburgh TJ (2008) Effort or timing: The effect of lump-sum bonuses. Quant. Marketing Econom. 6(3):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zoltners AA, Sinha P, Lorimer SE (2008) Sales force effectiveness: A framework for researchers and practitioners. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 28(2):115–131.Crossref, Google Scholar