Mental Equilibrium and Strategic Emotions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2398

References

  • Aumann RJ (1959) Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. Tucker AW, Luce RD, eds. Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, Annals of Mathematics Study 40 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 287–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann RJ (2008) Rule rationality vs. act rationality. Discussion Paper 497, Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  • Bachi B, Ghosh S, Neeman Z (2013) Communication and deception in two-person games. Working paper, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.Google Scholar
  • Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1):122–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergman N, Bergman YZ (2003) Ecologies of Preferences with envy as an antidote to risk-aversion in bargaining. Discussion Paper 322, Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  • Bester H, Sakovics J (2001) Delegated bargaining and renegotiation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 45(4):459–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cason T, Lau S, Mui V (2013) Learning, teaching, and turn taking in the repeated assignment game. Econom. Theory 54(2):335–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error and the future of human life. Scientific Amer. 271(4):144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damasio AR, Grabowski TJ, Bechara A, Damasio H, Ponto LL, Parvizi J, Hichwa RD (2000) Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nature Neuroscience 3(10):1049–1056.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekel E, Ely JC, Yilankaya O (2007) Evolution of preferences. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(3):685–704.Google Scholar
  • Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fershtman C, Heifetz A (2006) Read my lips, watch for leaps: Preference equilibrium and political instability. Econom. J. 116(508):246–265.Google Scholar
  • Fershtman C, Kalai E (1997) Unobserved delegation. Internat. Econom. Rev. 38(4):763–774.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fershtman C, Judd KL, Kalai E (1991) Observable contracts: Strategic delegation and cooperation. Internat. Econom. Rev. 32(3):551–559.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Imas A (2013) Materazzi effect and the strategic use of anger in competitive interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(4):1334–1337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gueth W, Kliemt H (1998) The indirect evolutionary approach: Bridging between rationality and adaptation. Rationality Soc. 10(3):377–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gueth W, Ockenfels A (2001) The coevolution of morality and legal institutions: An indirect evolutionary approach. Working paper, Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Gueth W, Yaari M (1992) An evolutionary approach to explaining reciprocal behavior in a simple strategic game. Witt U, ed. Explaining Process and Change (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor), 23–34.Google Scholar
  • Gueth W, Schmittbereger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):367–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isaac RM, Walker JM, Williams AW (1994) Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: Experimental evidence utilizing very large groups. J. Public Econom. 54(1):1–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalay A (2003) Friends or foes? Empirical test of a simple one-period Nash equilibrium. Mimeo, Lecture at the Center for the Study of Rationality of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, April 6.Google Scholar
  • Kaplan T, Ruffle B (2012) Which way to cooperate. Econom. J. 122(563):1042–1068.Google Scholar
  • Mailath G, Samuelson L (2006) Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meshulam M, Winter E, Shahar GB, Aharon Y (2012) Rational emotions in the lab. Soc. Neuroscience 7(1):11–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ochsner KN, Gross JJ (2005) The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cognitive Sci. 9(5):242–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olschewski G, Swiatczak L (2009) Existence of mental equilibria in 2 × 2 games. Mimeo, Handelshochschule Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
  • Rustichini A, Villeval MC (2014) Moral hypocrisy, power and social preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 107:10–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sibly H, Tisdell J, Evans S (2014) Turn-taking in finitely repeated symmetric games: Experimental evidence. Working paper, University of Tasmania, Hobart.Google Scholar
  • Tice DM, Bratslavsky E (2000) Giving in to feel good: The place of emotion regulation in the context of general self-control. Psych. Inquiry 11(3):149–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter E (2009) Incentive reversal. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 1(2):133–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.