Do People Anticipate Loss Aversion?

References

• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, L’Haridon O (2008) A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 36(3):245–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutstrom EE (2008) Eliciting time and risk preferences. Econometrica 76(3):583–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson LR, DiTraglia FJ, Gerlach JR (2011) Measuring altruism in a public goods experiment: A comparison of U.S. and Czech subjects. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):426–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Sprenger C (2012) Risk preferences are not time preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3357–3376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arlen J, Tontrup S (2015) Does the endowment effect justify legal intervention? The debiasing effect of institutions. J. Legal Stud. 44(1):143–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashraf N, Karlan D, Yin W (2006) Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. Quart. J. Econom. 121(1):635–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augenblick N, Niederle M, Sprenger C (2015) Working over time: Dynamic inconsistency in real effort tasks. Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1067–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G, Jensen M, Murphy K (1988) Compensation and incentives: Practice vs. theory. J. Finance 43(3):593–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis NC (2013) Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. J. Econom. Perspect. 27(1):173–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks RRW, Stremitzer A, Tontrup S (2012) Framing contracts: Why loss framing increases effort. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. 168(1):62–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Chua ZE, Camerer CF (2009) Learning and visceral temptation in dynamic saving experiments. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):197–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadena X, Cristea SA, Delgado-Medrano HM (2011) Fighting procrastination in the workplace: An experiment. NBER Working Paper 16944, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Loewenstein G, Rabin M, eds. (2004) Advances in Behavioral Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U, Imas A (2013) Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 87(March):43–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Araujo FA, Carbone E, Conell-Price L, Dunietz MW, Jaroszewicz A, Landsman R, Lamé D, Vesterlund L, Wang S, Wilson AJ (2015) The effect of incentives on real effort: Evidence from the slider task. CESifo Working Paper 5372, CESifo Group Munich, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Quidt J (2014) Your loss is my gain: A recruitment experiment with framed incentives. Working paper, Stockholm University, Stockholm. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418218.Google Scholar
• DiTraglia FJ (2006) Experimental public goods in Prague and Williamsburg: An international comparison. Working paper, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.Google Scholar
• Ericson KMM, Fuster A (2014) The endowment effect. Ann. Rev. Econom. 6(1):555–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryer RG Jr, Levitt SD, List JA, Sadoff S (2012) Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment. NBER Working Paper 18237, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giné X, Goldberg J, Silverman D, Yang D (2012) Revising commitments: Field evidence on the adjustment of prior choices. NBER Working Paper 18065, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, List JA (2012) The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Management Sci. 58(12):2151–2167.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsiaw A (2013) Goal-setting and self-control. J. Econom. Theory 148(2):601–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiaw A (2015) Goal-bracketing and self-control. Working paper, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
• Imas A (2014) Working for the “warm glow”: On the benefits and limits of prosocial incentives. J. Public Econom. 114(June):14–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John LK, Loewenstein G, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender JE, Volpp KG (2011) Financial incentives for extended weight loss: A randomized, controlled trial. J. General Internal Medicine 26(6):621–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1325–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Kremer M, Mullainathan S (2010) Self-control and the development of work arrangements. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 100(2):624–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Kremer M, Mullainathan S (2015) Self-control at work. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1227–1277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (1991) Labor economics and the psychology of organizations. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(2):89–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA, Neckermann S, Sadoff S (2016) The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 8(4):183–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Samek AS (2014) The behavioralist as nutritionist: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve child food choice and consumption. J. Health Econom. 39(January):133–146.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Adler D (1995) A bias in the prediction of tastes. Econom. J. 105(431):929–937.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (2003) Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1209–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luft J (1994) Bonus and penalty incentives contract choice by employees. J. Accounting Econom. 18(2):181–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madrian BC (2014) Applying insights from behavioral economics to policy design. Ann. Rev. Econom. 6(1):663–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306(5695):503–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Royer H, Stehr MF, Sydnor JR (2015) Incentives, commitments and habit formation in exercise: Evidence from a field experiment with workers at a Fortune-500 company. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 7(3):51–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sadoff S, Samek AS, Sprenger C (2015) Dynamic inconsistency in food choice: Experimental evidence from a food desert. Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics Working Paper 2572821, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmid F, Trede M (1995) A distribution free test for the two sample problem for general alternatives. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 20(4):409–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz J, Mochon D, Wyper L, Maroba J, Patel D, Ariely D (2014) Healthier by precommitment. Psych. Sci. 25(2):538–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solnick JV, Kannenberg CH, Eckerman DE, Waller MB (1980) An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. Learn. Motivation 11(1):61–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sprenger C (2015) An endowment effect for risk: Experimental tests of stochastic reference points. J. Political Econom. 123(6):1456–1499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, Dunning D, Loewenstein G (2000) Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(1):66–76.Crossref, Google Scholar