Market Information and Bidder Heterogeneity in Secondary Market Online B2B Auctions

References

• Adaval R, Monroe KB (2002) Automatic construction and use of contextual information for product and price evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 28(4):572–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Curley SP, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2012) Effect of information feedback on bidder behavior in continuous combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. 58(4):811–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Amemiya T (1985) Advanced Econometrics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Anwar S, McMillan R, Zheng M (2006) Bidding behavior in competing auctions: Evidence from eBay. Eur. Econom. Rev. 50(2):307–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Simonsohn I (2003) Buying, bidding, playing or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1/2):113–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Hortacsu A (2003) The winner’s curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):329–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Jank W, Shmueli G (2008) Price formation and its dynamics in online auctions. Decision Support Systems 44(3):641–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Chang SA, Goes P, Gupta A (2009) Overlapping online auctions: Empirical characterization of bidder strategies and auction prices. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 22(4):763–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Goes P, Gupta A, Jin Y (2004) User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: An empirical exploration. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 28(1):21–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow ET, Park YH (2007) Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in internet auctions using a generalized record breaking model. Marketing Sci. 26(2):218–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Bruno HA, Che S, Dutta S (2012) Role of reference price on price and quantity: Insights from business-to-business markets. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):640–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Kadiyali V, Park Y (2007) Willingness to pay and competition in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. 44(2):324–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2006) How often should reputation mechanisms update a trader’s reputation profile? Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):271–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Dholakia UM, Simonson I (2005) The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. 24(2):206–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Dholakia UM, Soltysinski K (2001) Coveted or overlooked? The psychology of bidding for comparable listings in digital auctions. Marking Lett. 12(3):225–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dholakia UM, Basuroy S, Soltysinski K (2002) Auction or agent (or both)? A study of moderators of the herding bias in digital auctions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 19(2):115–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fraley C, Raftery AE (1999) MCLUST: Software for model-based cluster analysis. J. Classification 16(2):297–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilkeson JH, Reynolds K (2003) Determinants of internet auction success and closing price: An exploratory study. Psych. Marketing 20(6):537–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häubl G, Popkowski Leszczyc P (2003) Minimum prices and product valuations in auctions. Marketing Science Institute Report 03-117, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyman J, Orhun Y, Ariely D (2004) Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi-endowment in product valuations? J. Interactive Marketing 18(4):7–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Internet Retailer (2009) Recognizing its limits, eBay refocuses on selling excess merchandise. (April 1), http://www.internetretailer.com/2009/04/01/recognizing-its-limits-ebay-refocuses-on-selling-excess-merchan.Google Scholar
• Kamins MA, Dreze X, Folkes VS (2004) Effects of seller-supplied prices on buyers’ product evaluations: Reference prices in an Internet auction context. J. Consumer Res. 30(4):622–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ku G, Galinsky AD, Murnighan JK (2006) Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(6):975–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer N, Forman C, Kekre S, Sun B (2012) Ushering buyers into electronic channels: An empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1212–1231.Link, Google Scholar
• Levin J (2004) Auction theory. Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, http://web.stanford.edu/∼jdlevin/Econ%20286/Auctions.pdf.Google Scholar
• Li T, Zheng X (2009) Entry and competition effects in first-price auctions: Theory and evidence from procurement auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(4):1397–1429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley D, Bryan D, Prasad N, Reeves D (2000) Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. J. Indust. Econom. 55(2):223–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddala GS (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazumdar T, Raj SP, Sinha I (2005) Reference price research: Review and propositions. J. Marketing 69(4):84–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Weber R (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50(5):1089–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunes JC, Boatwright P (2004) Incidental prices and their effect on consumer willingness to pay. J. Marketing Res. 41(4):457–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park YH, Bradlow ET (2005) An integrated model for bidding behavior in Internet auctions: Whether, who, when, and how much. J. Marketing Res. 42(4):470–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters M, Severinov S (2006) Internet auctions with many traders. J. Econom. Theory 130(1):220–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajendran KN, Tellis G (1994) Contextual and temporals of reference price. J. Marketing Res. 58(1):22–34.Google Scholar
• Ray S, Turi RH (1999) Determination of number of clusters in K-means clustering and application in color image segmentation. Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Adv. Pattern Recognition and Digital Techniques, ICAPRDT99, Calcutta, India.Google Scholar
• Shmueli G, Jank W (2005) Visualizing online auctions. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. 14(2):299–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shum M (2004) Does advertising overcome brand loyalty? Evidence from breakfast cereals. J. Econom. Management Strategy 13(2):241–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Ariely D (2008) When rational sellers face nonrational buyers: Evidence from herding on eBay. Management Sci. 54(9):1624–1637.Link, Google Scholar
• Spann M, Häubl G, Skiera B, Bernhardt M (2012) Bid-elicitation interfaces and bidding behavior in retail interactive pricing. J. Retailing 88(1):131–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urbany JE, Dickson PR (1991) Consumer normal price estimation: Market versus personal standards. J. Consumer Res. 18(1):45–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Hu Y (2009) The effect of experience on internet auction bidding dynamics. Marketing Lett. 20(3):245–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward JH Jr (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58(301):236–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcox RT (2000) Experts and amateurs: The role of experience in internet auctions. Marketing Lett. 11(4):363–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolk A, Spann M (2008) The effects of reference prices on bidding behavior in interactive pricing mechanisms. J. Interactive Marketing 22(4):2–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yadav MS, Seiders K (1998) Is the price right? Understanding contingent processing in reference price formation. J. Retailing 74(3):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar