The Trouble with Instruments: The Need for Pretreatment Balance in Shock-Based Instrumental Variable Designs

References

• Abadie A (2003) Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models. J. Econometrics 113:231–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91:1369–1401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern K, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127:137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrade SC, Bernile G, Hood FM III (2014) SOX, corporate transparence and the cost of debt. J. Banking Finance 38:145–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2015) Mastering Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91:444–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong CS, Core JE, Guay WR (2014) Do independent directors cause improvements in firm transparency? J. Financial Econom. 113:383–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atanasov V, Black B (2016) Shock-based causal inference in corporate finance and accounting research. Critical Finance Rev. 5:207–304.Google Scholar
• Bach L (2014) Are small businesses worthy of financial aid? Evidence from a French targeted credit program. Rev. Finance 18:877–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakke T-E, Whited T (2012) Threshold events and identification: A study of cash shortfalls. J. Finance 67:1083–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan K, Billings MB, Kelly B, Ljundqvist A (2014) shaping liquidity: On the causal effects of voluntary disclosure. J. Finance 69:2237–2278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargeron LL, Lehn KM, Zutter CJ (2010) Sarbanes-Oxley and corporate risk-taking. J. Accounting. Econom. 49:34–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Nielssen KM, Perez-Gonzalez F, Wolfenzon D (2007) Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quart. J. Econom. 122:647–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertomeu J, Beyer A, Taylor D (2016) From casual to causal inference in accounting research: The need for theoretical foundations. Foundations Trends Accounting 10:262–313.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. Quart. J. Econom. 119:249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Black SE, Jensen S, Lleras-Muney A (2019) Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quota on female labor market outcomes in Norway. Rev. of Econom. Stud. 86:191–239.Google Scholar
• Black B, Hollingsworth A, Nunes L, Simon K (2019) The effect of health insurance on mortality: Statistical power what we can learn from the Affordable Care Act coverage expansions. NBER Working Paper No. 25568, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bohren O, Staubo S (2014) Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. J. Corporate Finance 28:152–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen D, Fresard L, Taillard JP (2017) What’s your identification strategy? Innovation in corporate finance research. Management Sci. 63:2529–2548.Link, Google Scholar
• Bradley M, Chen D (2015) Does board independence reduce the cost of debt? Financial Management (Spring):15–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busso M, DiNardo J, McCrary J (2014) New evidence on the finite sample properties of propensity score reweighting and matching estimators. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96:885–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catan E, Klausner M (2017) Board declassification and firm value: Have shareholders and boards really destroyed billions in value? Preprint, submitted September 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2994559. Google Scholar
• Chalfin A, McCrary J (2018) Are U.S. cities underpoliced? Theory and evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 100:167–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang AC, Li P (2017) Is economics research replicable? Sixty published papers from thirteen journals say “usually not.” Working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Chhaochharia V, Grinstein Y (2007) Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of the 2002 governance rules. J. Finance 62:1789–1825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chhaochharia V, Otto CA, Vig V (2011) The unintended effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. J. Institutional Theoretical Econom. 167:149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D (2014) The Non-monotonic effect of board independence on credit ratings. J. Financial Services Res. 45:145–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Cheng Q, Wang X (2015) Does increased board independence reduce earnings management? Evidence from recent regulatory reforms. Rev. Accounting Stud. 20:899–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy CJ (2012) Hiring cheerleaders: Board appointments of “independent” directors. Management Sci. 58:1039–1058.Link, Google Scholar
• Cole S, Paulson A, Shastri G (2014) Smart money? The effect of education on financial outcomes. Rev. Financial Stud. 27:2022–2051.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelli F, Kominek Z, Ljungqvist A (2013) Monitoring managers: Does it matter? J. Finance 68:431–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crump RK, Hotz VJ, Imbens GW, Mitnik OA (2009) Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 96:187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cruz LM, Moreira MJ (2005) On the validity of econometric techniques with weak instruments: Inference on returns to education using compulsory school attendance laws. J. Human Resources 40:393–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dah MA, Frye MB, Hurst M (2014) Board changes and CEO turnover: The unanticipated effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. J. Banking Finance 41:97–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahya J, McConnell JJ (2007) Board composition, corporate performance and the cadbury committee recommendation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 42:535–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dale-Olsen H, Schone P, Verner M (2013) Diversity among norwegian boards of directors: Does a quota for women improve firm performance? Female Econom. 19:110–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dam L, Koetter M (2012) Bank bailouts and moral hazard: Evidence from Germany. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2343–2380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai M, Dharmapala D (2009) Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Rev. Econom. Statist. 91:537–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dharmapala D (2016) Estimating firms’ responses to securities regulation using a bunching approach. Preprint, submitted October 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2817151.Google Scholar
• Dharmapala D, Foley F, Forbes K (2011) Watch what I do, not what I say: The unintended consequences of the homeland investment act. J. Finance 66:753–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donelson D, McInnis J, Mergenthaler R (2016) The effect of governance reforms on financial reporting fraud. J. Law Finance Accounting 1(2):1–40.Google Scholar
• Duchin R, Matsusaka J, Ozbas O (2010) When are outside directors effective? J. Financial Econom. 95:195–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchin R, Matsusaka J, Ozbas O (2015) Comments on “The trouble with instruments: Re-examining shock-IV designs” by Atanasov and Black. Preprint, submitted November 22, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2697098.Google Scholar
• Eckbo BE, Nygaard K, Thorburn KS (2016) How costly is forced gender-balancing of corporate boards. Working paper, European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Elwert F, Winship C (2014) Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Rev. Sociol. 40:31–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fracassi C, Tate G (2012) External networking and internal firm governance. J. Finance 67(1):153–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frangakis CE, Rubin DB (2002) Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics 58:21–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French E, Song J (2014) The effect of disability insurance receipt on labor supply. Amer. Econom. J. Policy 6:291–337.Google Scholar
• French E, Taber C (2011) Identification of models of the labor market. Handbook Labor Econom. 4:537–617.Google Scholar
• Gao F, Wu JS, Zimmerman J (2009) Unintended consequences of granting small firms exemptions from securities regulation: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. J. Accounting Res. 47:459–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge W, Koester A, McVay S (2017) Benefits and costs of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b) exemption: Evidence from small firms’ internal control disclosures. J. Accounting Econom. 63:358–384.Google Scholar
• Goetz M, Laeven L, Levine R (2013) Identifying the valuation effects and agency costs of corporate diversification: Evidence from the geographic diversification of U.S. banks. Rev. Financial Stud. 26:1788–1823.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gow ID, Larcker DE, Reiss PC (2016) Causal inference in accounting research. J. Accounting Res. 54:477–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Leary M (2011) A review of empirical capital structure research and directions for the future. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 3:309–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grieser WD, Hadlock CJ (2019) Panel data estimation in finance: Testable assumptions and parameter (in)consistency. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 54(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gustafson MT, Iliev P (2017) The effects of removing barriers to equity issuance. J. Financial Econom. 124:580–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Vytlacil E (2005) Structural equations, treatment effects, and econometric policy evaluation. Econometrica 73:669–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Urzua S, Vytlacil E (2006) Understanding instrumental variables with essential heterogeneity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88:389–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Jones C, Menkveld A (2011) Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? J. of Finance 66: 1–33.Google Scholar
• Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Anal. 15:199–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iliev P (2010) The effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, earnings quality, and stock prices. J. Finance 65:1163–1196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rosenbaum PR (2005) Robust, accurate confidence intervals with a weak instrument: Quarter of birth and education. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. A 168:109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Literature 47:5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang W (2017) Have instrumental variables brought us closer to the truth. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 6:127–140.Google Scholar
• Kim S, Klein A (2017) Did the 1999 NYSE and NASDAQ listing standard changes on audit committee composition benefit investors. Accounting Rev. 92:187–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinney WR Jr, Shepardson ML (2011) Do control effectiveness disclosures require SOX 404(b) internal control audits? A natural experiment with small U.S. public companies. J. Accounting Res. 49:413–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaPorta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Law and finance. J. Political Econom. 106:1113–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Rusticus TO (2010) On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. J. Accounting Econom. 49:186–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E, Strong N, Zhu Z (2014) Did regulation fair disclosure, SOX, and other analyst regulations reduce security mispricing. J. Accounting Res. 52:733–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litvak K, Black B, Yoo W (2016) The SEC’s busted randomized experiment: What can and cannot be learned. Preprint, submitted August 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2820031.Google Scholar
• Matsa DA, Miller AR (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 5:136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMartin AS, Needles AM (2016) Does governance regulation curb financial misreporting? Evidence from accounting misstatements following board independence listing requirements. Working paper, Warrington School of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville. Google Scholar
• Morgan S, Winship C (2014) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearl J (2009) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen M (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, vol. 2A (North Holland, Amsterdam), 493–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (2009) Design of Observational Studies (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig M, Wolpin K (2000) Natural ‘natural experiments’ in economics. J. Econom. Literature 38:827–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (2008) For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. Ann. Appl. Statist. 2:808–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sovey AJ, Green DP (2011) Instrumental variables estimation in political science: A reader’s guide. Amer. J. Political Sci. 55:188–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20:518–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoutsoura M (2015) The effect of succession taxes on family firm investment: Evidence from a natural experiment. J. Finance 70:649–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber DP, Yang YS (2019) The debt-equity choice when regulatory thresholds are based on equity values: Evidence from SOX 404. Preprint, submitted May 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2675366.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Young A (2018) Consistency without inference: Instrumental variables in practical application. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar