Creating Social Contagion Through Firm-Mediated Message Design: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

References

• Aral S, Walker D (2011a) Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Sci. 57(9):1623–1639.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2011b) Identifying social influence in networks using randomized experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems 26(5):91–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2012) Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337(6092):337–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asch SE (1955) Opinions and social pressure. Sci. Amer. 193(5):31–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Eckles D, Yan R, Rosenn I (2012) Social influence in social advertising: Evidence from field experiments. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 146–161.Google Scholar
• Banerjee A (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment in an online music social network. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Link, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Qiu L, Rice SC (2017) Repeated interactions vs. social ties: Quantifying the economic value of trust, forgiveness, and reputation using a field experiment. MIS Quart. 41(3):841–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Milkman K (2012) What makes online content viral? J. Marketing Res. 49(2):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biyalogorsky E, Gerstner E, Libai B (2001) Customer referral management: Optimal reward programs. Marketing Sci. 20(1):82–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Bond R, Smith PB (1996) Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psych. Bull. 119(1):111–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2017) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.Link, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Chen Y, Fang H (2009) Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):864–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai J, De Janvry A, Sadoulet E (2015) Social networks and the decision to insure. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 7(2):81–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, De P, Hu YJ (2015) IT-enabled broadcasting in social media: An empirical study of artists’ activities and music sales. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):513–531.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang Q, Xie J (2011) Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth vs. observational learning. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):238–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dou Y, Niculescu MF, Wu DJ (2013) Engineering optimal network effects via social media features and seeding in markets for digital goods and services. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):164–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems 45(4):1007–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kremer M (2007) Using randomization in development economics research: A toolkit. Schultz T, Strauss J, eds. Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 4 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 3895–3962.Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Dupas P, Kremer M (2011) Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1739–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske AP (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psych. Rev. 99(4):689–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Han SP (2011) An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior on the mobile Internet. Management Sci. 57(9):1671–1691.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilchrist DS, Sands EG (2016) Something to talk about: Social spillovers in movie consumption. J. Polit. Econom. 124(5):1339–1382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D (2011) Commentary—Invited comment on “Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion”. Marketing Sci. 30(2):224–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D, Chen Y, Das S, Dellarocas C, Pfeiffer B, Libai B, Sen S, Shi M, Verlegh P (2005) The firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Lett. 16(3–4):415–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu B, Park J, Konana P (2012) The impact of external word-of-mouth sources on retailer sales of high-involvement products. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):182–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR (2010) Demand estimation with social interactions and the implications for targeted marketing. Marketing Sci. 29(4):585–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong W, Thong JY, Tam KY (2004) The effects of information format and shopping task on consumers’ online shopping behavior: A cognitive fit perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(3):149–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Pavlou PA, Wang K, Shi N (2016) On the role of fairness and social distance in designing effective social referral systems. MIS Quart. 41(3):787–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Sun T, Chen P, Golden JM (2019) Word-of-mouth system implementation and customer conversion: A randomized field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):805–818.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Gu B, Hong Y, Liang C, Wang K, Fu D, Yang B (2018) Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Sci. 65(1):327–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Horrace WC, Oaxaca RL (2006) Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model. Econom. Lett. 90(3):321–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irwin JR, McClelland GH (2003) Negative consequences of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables. J. Marketing Res. 40(3):366–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Lee JY (2015) Social contagion in new product trial and repeat. Marketing Sci. 34(3):408–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Benbasat I (2007) The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers’ brand understanding. MIS Quart. 31(3):475–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung J, Bapna R, Golden J, Sun T (2020) Words matter! Toward pro-social call-to-action for online referral: Evidence from two field experiments. Inform. Systems Res. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Zubcsek PP, Sarvary M (2011) Network effects and personal influences: Diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):425–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Li Q (2010) Optimal referral bonuses with asymmetric information: Firm-offered and interpersonal incentives. Marketing Sci. 29(1):108–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Benbasat I (2004) The effect of relationship encoding, task type, and complexity on information representation: An empirical evaluation of 2D and 3D line graphs. MIS Quart. 28(2):255–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YJ, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Lucas HC Jr, Shmueli G (2013) Research commentary—Too big to fail: Large samples and the p-value problem. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):906–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Ma L, Krishnan R, Montgomery AL (2015) Latent homophily or social influence? An empirical analysis of purchase within a social network. Management Sci. 61(2):454–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reeder GD, Kumar S, Hesson-McInnis MS, Trafimow D (2002) Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83:789–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryu G, Feick L (2007) A penny for your thoughts: Reward programs and referral likelihood. J. Marketing 71(1):84–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt P, Skiera B, Van den Bulte C (2011) Referral programs and customer value. J. Marketing 75(January):46–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze C, Schöler L, Skiera B (2014) Not all fun and games: Viral marketing for utilitarian products. J. Marketing 78(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L, Tang Q, Whinston AB (2015) Two formulas for success in social media: Learning and network effects. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(4):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun M, Zhang X, Zhu F (2019a) U-shaped conformity in online social networks. Marketing Sci. 38(3):461–480.Link, Google Scholar
• Sun T, Taylor SJ (2020) Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment. Quant. Marketing Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun T, Gao G, Jin GZ (2019b) Mobile messaging for offline group formation in prosocial activities: A large field experiment. Management Sci. 65(6):2717–2736.Link, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2007) Local network effects and complex network structure. B. E. J. Theoret. Econom. 7(1), https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1704.1319.Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Oh JH, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Syst. Res. 23(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Eckles D (2018) Randomized experiments to detect and estimate social influence in networks. Lehmann S, Ahn Y-Y, eds. Complex Spreading Phenomena in Social Systems (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 289–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuk MA, Verlegh PW, Smidts A, Wigboldus DH (2009) Sales and sincerity: The role of relational framing in word-of-mouth marketing. J. Consumer Psych. 19(1):38–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2008) Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. 54(12):2024–2038.Link, Google Scholar
• Verlegh PW, Ryu G, Tuk MA, Feick L (2013) Receiver responses to rewarded referrals: the motive inferences framework. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 41(6):669–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wirtz J, Orsingher C, Chew P, Tambyah SK (2012) The role of metaperception on the effectiveness of referral reward programs. J. Service Res. 16(1):82–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2012) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Walker D, Muchnik L (2014) Design of randomized experiments in networks. Proc. IEEE 102(12):1940–1951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang A, Zhang M, Hann IH (2018) Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):641–655.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang M, Ren Y, Adomavicius G (2019) Understanding user-generated content and customer engagement on Facebook business pages. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):839–855.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Mitra S, Zhang H (2016) When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):131–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar