Trust and Disintermediation: Evidence from an Online Freelance Marketplace
Published Online:1 Jul 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3583
References
- (2016) Does standardized information in online markets disproportionately benefit job applicants from less developed countries? J. Internat. Econom. 103(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The bright side of supplier encroachment. Marketing Sci. 26(5):651–659.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premium and buyer behavior. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 26(3):243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, vol. 1. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Repeated interactions versus social ties: Quantifying the economic value of trust, forgiveness, and reputation using a field experiment. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(3):841–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Small numbers bargaining in the age of big data: Evidence from a two-sided labor matching platform. Preprint, submitted December 10, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277455.Google Scholar
- (2014) Why marketplace experimentation is harder than it seems: The role of test-control interference. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), New York) 567–582.Google Scholar
- (2004) Repetition and reputation: Implications for trust and trustworthiness when institutions change. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):362–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) More trusting, less trust? An investigation of early e-commerce in China. NBER Working Paper No. w18961, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2010) The dynamics of seller reputation: Evidence from eBay. J. Indust. Econom. 58(1):54–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Intrinsic and instrumental reciprocity: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 87:100–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Trust and trustworthiness reputations in an investment game. Games Econom. Behav. 72:(2)361–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Aggregation of consumer ratings: An application to Yelp.com. Quant. Marketing Econom. 16(3):289–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Disintermediation in two-sided marketplaces. Technical Note 917-004, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2015) Price coherence and excessive intermediation. Quart. J. Econom. 130(3):1283–1328.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb. Diehl K, Yoon C, eds. Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 43 (Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN), 518–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Multi-sided platforms. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 43:162–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Reputation inflation: Evidence from an online labor market. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
- (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) From lemon markets to managed markets: The evolution of eBay’s reputation system. Working paper, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
- (2006) Price, quality, and reputation: Evidence from an online field experiment. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):983–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) How do platform participants respond to an unfair rating? An analysis of a ride-sharing platform using a quasi-experiment. Preprint, submitted May 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2970772.Google Scholar
- (2012) Which is more important in internet shopping, perceived price or trust? Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 11(3):241–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Information acquisition and reputation dynamics. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(4):1400–1425.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Designing online marketplaces: Trust and reputation mechanisms. Greenstein S, Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 17 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA), 77–93.Google Scholar
- (2015) Canary in the e-commerce coal mine: Detecting and predicting poor experiences using buyer-to-seller messages. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), New York)Google Scholar
- (2014) Doing business with strangers: Reputation in online service marketplaces. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):865–886.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):392–414.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(1):105–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Digital disintermediation and efficiency in the market for ideas. Working Paper 6880, CESifo, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2020) Trust and governance: Untangling a tangled web. Acad. Management Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2002) Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. Adv. Appl. Microeconomics 11:127–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Envisioning value: Certification, matchmaking, and returns to brokerage. Working paper, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J. Econom. Literature 43(2):392–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996a) Market making by price‐setting firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. 63(4):559–580. Google Scholar
- (1996b) Market microstructure and intermediation. J. Econom. Perspect. 10(3):135–152. Google Scholar
- (1999) Market Microstructure: Intermediaries and the Theory of the Firm (Cambridge University Press, New York). Google Scholar
- (2011) Should business method inventions be patentable? J. Legal Anal. 3(1):265–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Landing the first job: The value of intermediaries in online hiring. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):810–854.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) The value of seller trustworthiness in C2C online markets. Comm. ACM 45(12):45–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Antecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review. J. Consumer Behav. 16(6):485–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) On-line reputation systems: The effects of feedback comments and reactions on building and rebuilding trust in on-line auctions. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 13(3):95–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) And the bands played on: Digital disintermediation and the quality of new recorded music. Preprint, submitted July 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2117372.Google Scholar
- (2015) Storming the gatekeepers: Digital disintermediation in the market for books. Inform. Econom. Policy 31(1):47–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) ZBJ: Building a global outsourcing platform for knowledge workers (A). Case 618-044, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar

