How Transparency into Internal and External Responsibility Initiatives Influences Consumer Choice
Published Online:13 May 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3588
References
- (2011) Voluntary disclosure of negative information in corporate communication. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
- Alta Gracia (2019) Mission. Accessed February 23, 2020, https://altagraciaapparel.com/pages/mission.Google Scholar
- Amazon.com (2018) NIKE ColorDry men’s polo. Accessed March 3, 2017, https://www.amazon.com/NIKE-ColorDry-Mens-Polo/dp/B07CRJ3KWW.Google Scholar
- (2004) Determining consumer preferences for ecolabeled forest products: An experimental approach. J. Forestry 102(4):28–32.Google Scholar
- (2006) Do ethical consumers care about price? A revealed preference analysis of fair trade coffee purchases. Canadian J. Agricultural Econom. 54(4):555–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. J. Bus. Ethics 76(4):361–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of CSR domains. J. Bus. Res. 95:502–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J. Bus. Res. 59(1):46–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Measuring the short-term effect of in-store promotion and retail advertising on brand sales: A factorial experiment. J. Marketing Res. 28(2):202–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Operational response to climate change: Are carbon abatement projects becoming less profitable over time? Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57(9):1564–1579.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Sci. 63(6):1673–1695.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Relative performance transparency: Effects on sustainable choices. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (1995) When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. J. Consumer Psych. 4(3):225–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. J. Consumer Res. 27(1):69–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Improving supplier compliance through joint and shared audits with collective penalty. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(2):363–380.Google Scholar
- (2009) Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. J. Marketing 73(6):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Sourcing under supplier responsibility risk: The effects of certification, audit, and contingency payment. Management Sci. 63(9):2795–2812.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Stepping toward sustainable business: An evaluation of waste minimization practices in US manufacturing. Interfaces 30(3):107–124.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Strengthening state capabilities: The role of financial incentives in the call to public service. Quart. J. Econom. 128(3):1169–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Employee wellbeing, productivity and firm performance. Working paper, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
- (1994) The effects of advertising on brand switching and repeat purchasing. J. Marketing Res. 31(1):28–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Sci. 57(9):1528–1545.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) The economic effects of a citywide minimum wage. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 60(4):522–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Major media in the shopping aisle. Strategy Bus. (November 25), https://www.strategy-business.com/article/08406?gko=825cd.Google Scholar
- (2000) Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? J. Retailing 76(3):393–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 34(2):147–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The impact of climate information on milk demand: Evidence from a field experiment. Food Policy 58:14–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Are hazardous substance rankings effective? An empirical investigation of information dissemination about the relative hazards of chemicals and emissions reductions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 21(3):602–619.Link, Google Scholar
- (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Responsible sourcing in supply chains. Management Sci. 62(9):2722–2744.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Consumer demand for the fair trade label: Evidence from a multi-store field experiment. Rev. Econom Statist. 97(2):242–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Can household consumers save the wild fish? Lessons from a sustainable seafood advisory. J. Environ. Econom. Management 66(1):52–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Is there consumer demand for improved labor standards? Evidence from field experiments in social product labeling. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2020a) Managing supplier social and environmental impacts with voluntary versus mandatory disclosure to investors. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print February 5, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3382.Google Scholar
- (2020b) Reveal the supplier list? A trade-off in capacity vs. responsibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print January 15, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0795.Google Scholar
- (2016) Strategic disclosure of social and environmental impacts in a supply chain. Atasu A, ed. Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains (Springer, Berlin), 223–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48(2):289–299.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad. Management J. 42(6):599–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Market strategies for climate change. Eur. Management J. 22(3):304–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Nike’s waterless dye factory cuts energy use 60%. Environ. Leader (December 3), https://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/12/nikes-waterless-dye-factory-cuts-energy-use-60/.Google Scholar
- (2018) Supply chain visibility and social responsibility: Investigating consumers’ behaviors and motives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):617–636.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) The chief supply chain officer report 2012. SCM World. Accessed March 15, 2019, https://www.supplychainmovementcom/the-chief-supply-chain-oofficer-report-2012/.Google Scholar
- (2020) Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. Marketing Sci., ePub ahead of print April 22, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1200.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. J. Bus. Ethics 125(4):693–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Shaping the new rules of competition: UN global compact participant mirror. Report, McKinsey & Company, London.Google Scholar
- (2015) The impact of sustainability information on consumer decision making. J. Indust. Ecology 20(4):882–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 39(1):117–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Consumer social responsibility. Management Sci. 62(11):3123–3137.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: Implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(2):184–197.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Integration, incentives and innovation: Nike’s strategy to improve social and environmental conditions in its global supply chain. Working paper, Stanford University Global Management Supply Chain Forum, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Bus. Rev. (January-February).Google Scholar
- (2004) Consumers of the world unite: A market-based response to sweatshops. Labor Stud. J. 29(3):57–80.Google Scholar
- (2002) Achieving environmental and productivity improvements through model-based process redesign. Oper. Res. 50(5):751–763.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Why every company needs a CSR strategy and how to build it. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (2005) An assessment of strategic corporate philanthropy on perceptions of brand equity variables. J. Consumer Marketing 22(3):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Green manufacturing: An evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 54(3):445–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J. Management Psych. 21(7):600–619.Google Scholar
- (2006) The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 34(2):158–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. J. Marketing 70(4):154–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) A 21 word solution. Dialogue 26(2):4–7.Google Scholar
- (2014) The role of the beneficiary in willingness to pay for socially responsible products: A meta-analysis. J. Retailing 90(2):255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
- UN Global Compact, EY (2016) The state of sustainable supply chains: Building responsible and resilient supply chains. Report, Ernst & Young, London.Google Scholar
- (2011) Customer response to carbon labelling of groceries. J. Consumer Policy 34(1):153–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Consumer learning, brand loyalty and competition. Marketing Sci. 23(1):134–145.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Introduction. Visser W, ed. The Americas, World Guide to Sustainable Enterprise, vol. 4 (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), vii–ix.Google Scholar
- (2017) Smile big or not? Effects of smile intensity on perceptions of warmth and competence. J. Consumer Res. 43(5):787–805.Google Scholar
- (1998) A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. J. Public Policy Marketing 17(2):226–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
- . (2018) Stable scheduling increases productivity and sales: The stable scheduling study. Report, Worklife Law, University of California Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Worker Rights Consortium (2013) Global wage trends for apparel workers, 2001-2011. Accessed November 1, 2019, https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2013/07/11/69255/global-wage-trends-for-apparel-workers-2001-2011/.Google Scholar
- (1984) Efficiency wage models of unemployment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(2):200–205.Google Scholar
- (2006) The effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. J. Consumer Psych. 16(4):377–390.Crossref, Google Scholar

