Corporate Purpose in Public and Private Firms

References

• Abadie A, Imbens GW (2011) Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2005) Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(1):9–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert S, Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:263–295.Google Scholar
• Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Kamenica E, Prelec D (2008) Man’s search for meaning: The case of Legos. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 67(3-4):671–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asker J, Farre-Mensa J, Ljungqvist A (2014) Corporate investment and stock market listing: A puzzle? Rev. Financial Stud. 28(2):342–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Backus M, Conlon C, Sinkinson M (2021) Common ownership in America: 1980–2017. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 13(3):273–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard CI (1938) The Functions of the Executive, vol. 11 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1994) Changing the role of top management: Beyond strategy to purpose. Harvard Bus. Rev. 72(6):79–88.Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Riggio RE (2006) Transformational Leadership, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Cohen A, Hirst S (2017) The agency problems of institutional investors. J. Econom. Perspect. 31(3):89–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer HA, Micheli P, Besharov ML (2021) Meaning, mission, and measurement: How organizational performance measurement shapes perceptions of work as worthy. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print November 3, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2011) Identity, morals, and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quart. J. Econom. 126(2):805–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle A, Means G (1932) Private Property and the Modern Corporation (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Bernstein S (2015) Does going public affect innovation? J. Finance 70(4):1365–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML, Khurana R (2015) Leading Amidst Competing Technical and Institutional Demands: Revisiting Selznick’s Conception of Leadership (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
• Blair MM, Stout LA (1999) A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Rev. 85(2):247–328.Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Genakos C, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Management practices across firms and countries. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(1):12–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouchikhi H, Kimberley JR (2008) The Soul of the Corporation (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Brochet F, Loumioti M, Serafeim G (2015) Speaking of the short-term: Disclosure horizon and managerial myopia. Rev. Accounting Stud. 20(3):1122–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Rev. 73(3):305–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ (2001) Do institutional investors prefer near‐term earnings over long‐run value? Contemporary Accounting Res. 18(2):207–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L, Shen JC (2007) Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection, and acquirer returns. Strategic Management J. 28(9):891–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carney M, Van Essen M, Gedajlovic ER, Heugens PP (2015) What do we know about private family firms? A meta-analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 39(3):513–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM (2018) “I’m not mopping the floors, I’m putting a man on the moon”: How NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(2):323–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM, Lucas BJ (2018) How can leaders overcome the blurry vision bias? Identifying an antidote to the paradox of vision communication. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2106–2129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carton AM, Murphy C, Clark JR (2014) A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1544–1570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cascio WF (2003) Changes in workers, work, and organizations. Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski RJ, eds. Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 12 (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York), 401–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar L, Meier S (2018) Nonmonetary incentives and the implications of work as a source of meaning. J. Econom. Perspect. 32(3):215–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celikyurt U, Sevilir M, Shivdasani A (2010) Going public to acquire? The acquisition motive in IPOs. J. Financial Econom. 96(3):345–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD Jr (1977) The Visible Hand (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chapman C, Edmans A, Gosling T, Hutton W, Mayer C (2017) The Purposeful Company Executive Remuneration Report. Report, The Purposeful Company, London.Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, O’Reilly CA (2016) Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:199–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Feldman ER (2018) Activist‐impelled divestitures and shareholder value. Strategic Management J. 39(10):2726–2744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Tihanyi L, Certo ST, Hitt MA (2010) Marching to the beat of different drummers: The influence of institutional owners on competitive actions. Acad. Management J. 53(4):723–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corritore M, Goldberg A, Srivastava SB (2020) Duality in diversity: How intrapersonal and interpersonal cultural heterogeneity relate to firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P, Hitt M, Gimeno J (2001) The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Acad. Management J. 44(1):144–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Flaste R (1995) Why We Do What We Do: The Dynamics of Personal Autonomy (GP Putnam's Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• DesJardine MR, Marti E, Durand R (2021) Why activist hedge funds target socially responsible firms: The reaction costs of signaling corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management J. 64(3):851–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doidge C, Kahle KM, Karolyi GA, Stulz RM (2018) Eclipse of the public corporation or eclipse of the public markets? J. Appl. Corporate Finance 30(1):8–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles RG, Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2014) The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Sci. 60(11):2835–2857.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmans A (2020) Grow the Pie: How Great Companies Deliver Both Purpose and Profit (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmans A, Holderness CG (2017) Blockholders: A survey of theory and evidence. The Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Governance, vol. 1, 541–636.Google Scholar
• Feldman NE, Kawano L, Patel E, Rao N, Stevens M, Edgerton J (2018) The long and the short of it: Do public and private firms invest differently?” FEDS Working Paper No. 2018-068, Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE (2015) The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):575–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisch JE, Davidoff Solomon S (2020) Should corporations have a purpose? Research paper, University of Pennsylvania Institute for Law & Economics, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Fisch JE, Hamdani A, Davidoff Solomon S (2020) The new titans of Wall Street: A theoretical framework for passive investors. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 168:17.Google Scholar
• Fitza M, Tihanyi L (2017) How much does ownership form matter? Strategic Management J. 38(13):2726–2743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Follett MP (1940) Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett (Harper and Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Frankl VE (1946) Man’s Search for Meaning (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Freeman RE (2010) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrett J, Hoitash R, Prawitt DF (2014) Trust and financial reporting quality. J. Accounting Res. 52(5):1087–1125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg CM, Yiu S (2022) Acquisitions and organizational purpose. Preprint, submitted September 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3811690.Google Scholar
• Gartenberg CM, Zenger T (2022) The firm as a subsociety. Preprint, submitted January 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760643.Google Scholar
• Gartenberg CM, Prat A, Serafeim G (2019) Corporate purpose and financial performance. Organ. Sci. 30(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• George G, Haas MR, McGahan AM, Schillebeeckx SJ, Tracey P (2021) Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. J. Management, ePub ahead of print April 15, https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006450.Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Moran P (1996) Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):13–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Moran P, Almeida-Costa L (1995) The essence of the megacorporation: Shared context, not structural hierarchy. J. Institutional Theoretical Econom. 151(4):748–759.Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (2005) Four formal(izable) theories of the firm? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58(2):200–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012a) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012b) What do managers do? Exploring persistent performance differences among seemingly similar enterprises. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 680–731.Google Scholar
• Gilje EP, Taillard JP (2016) Do private firms invest differently than public firms? Taking cues from the natural gas industry. J. Finance 71(4):1733–1778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Srivastava SB, Manian VG, Monroe W, Potts C (2016) Fitting in or standing out? The tradeoffs of structural and cultural embeddedness. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(6):1190–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia LR, Cruz C, Berrone P, De Castro J (2011) The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):653–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2008) Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 93(1):48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal J, Serafeim G (2020) Research on Corporate Sustainability: Review and Directions for Future Research, Foundations and Trends in Accounting (Now Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. 94(4):691–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2015) The value of corporate culture. J. Financial Econom. 117(1):60–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison JR, Carroll GR (2006) Culture and Demography in Organizations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hart O, Zingales L (2017) Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value. J. Law Finance Accounting 2:247–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (2021) Innovation in the 21st century: Architectural change, purpose, and the challenges of our time. Management Sci. 67(9):5479–5488.Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Van den Steen E (2015) Why do firms have “purpose?” The firm’s role as a carrier of identity and reputation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):326–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R (2001) Cooperation, reciprocity and punishment in fifteen small-scale societies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):73–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollensbe E, Wookey C, Hickey L, George G, Nichols CV (2014) Organizations with purpose. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1227–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R, Hitt M, Johnson R, Grossman W (2002) Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Acad. Management J. 45(4):697–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahan M, Rock EB (2007) Hedge funds in corporate governance and corporate control. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 155:1021.Google Scholar
• Kahle KM, Stulz RM (2017) Is the US public corporation in trouble? J. Econom. Perspect. 31(3):67–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2019) Organizational governance adaptation: Who is in, who is out, and who gets what. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):6–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM (1996) Corporate culture and economic theory. Buckley P, Michie J, eds. Firms, Organizations and Contracts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 221–275.Google Scholar
• Li K, Mai F, Shen R, Yan X (2021) Measuring corporate culture using machine learning. Rev. Financial Stud. 34(7):3265–3315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo J, Kaul A (2019) Private action in public interest: The comparative governance of social issues. Strateg. Management J. 40(4):476–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mallow MJ, Sethi J (2015) Engagement: The missing middle approach in the Bebchuck-Strine debate. NYU J. Law Bus. 12:385.Google Scholar
• Marchetti A (2020) Firms of a feather merge together: The coordination benefits of compatible cultures. Preprint, submitted December 11, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3712838.Google Scholar
• Mayer C (2021) The future of the corporation and the economics of purpose. J. Management Stud. 58(3):887–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCahery JA, Sautner Z, Starks LT (2016) Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. J. Finance 71(6):2905–2932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michaelson C, Lepisto DA, Pratt MG (2020) Why corporate purpose statements often miss their mark. Strategy+Business (August 17).Google Scholar
• Nadella S (2017) Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft’s Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Caldwell DF, Chatman JA, Doerr B (2014) The promise and problems of organizational culture: CEO personality, culture, and firm performance. Group Organ. Management 39(6):595–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phalippou L (2020) An inconvenient fact: Private equity returns & the billionaire factory. Preprint, submitted June 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623820.Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Khurana R, Hill-Popper M (2004) Revisiting the meaning of leadership. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M, Serafeim G, Kramer M (2019) Where ESG fails. Institutional Investor (October 16), https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1hm5ghqtxj9s7/Where-ESG-Fails.Google Scholar
• Pratt MG (2016) Hybrid and multiple organizational identities. Pratt MG, Schultz M, Ashforth BE, Ravasi D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, New York), 106–120.Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Ashforth BE (2003) Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco), 309–327.Google Scholar
• Pratt MG, Foreman PO (2000) The beauty of and barriers to organizational theories of identity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):141–143.Google Scholar
• Renneboog L, Simons T, Wright M (2007) Why do public firms go private in the UK? The impact of private equity investors, incentive realignment and undervaluation. J. Corporate Finance 13(4):591–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G (2000) Visionaries, managers, and strategic direction. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):693–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein EH (1990) Organizational culture. Amer. Psychologist 45(2):109–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1948) Foundations of the theory of organization. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 13(1):25–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Goldberg A (2017) Language as a window into culture. Calif. Management Rev. 60(1):56–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thakor AV, Quinn RE (2013) The economics of higher purpose. ECGI-Finance Working Paper No. 395, European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Tracy JL, Robins RW (2007) Emerging insights into the nature and function of pride. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 16(3):147–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trostel AO, Nichols ML (1982) Privately-held and publicly-held companies: A comparison of strategic choices and management processes. Acad. Management J. 25(1):47–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyler TR (2001) Why do people rely on others? Social identity and social aspects of trust. Cook KS, ed. Trust in Society, vol. 2, Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 285–306.Google Scholar
• Villalonga B, Amit R (2020) Family ownership. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 36(2):241–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber Y, Tarba SY (2012) Mergers and acquisitions process: The use of corporate culture analysis. Cross Cultural Management 19(3):288–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wilson JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Wrzesniewski A (2003) Finding positive meaning in work. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco), 296–308.Google Scholar
• Younger R, Mayer C, Eccles RG (2020) Enacting purpose within the modern corporation. Report, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Zenger TR, Felin T, Bigelow L (2011) Theories of the firm–market boundary. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):89–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Gimeno J (2016) Earnings pressure and long-term corporate governance: Can long-term-oriented investors and managers reduce the quarterly earnings obsession? Organ. Sci. 27(2):354–372.Link, Google Scholar