The Impact of a Supreme Court Decision on the Preferences of Americans Regarding Abortion Policy
References
- (1998) Goal-directed emotions. Cognition Emotion 12(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) A learning-based model for imputing missing levels in partial conjoint profiles. J. Marketing Res. 41(4):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey. J. Marketing 46(3):44–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Preference formation. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 3(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The peculiar longevity of things not so bad. Psych. Sci. 15(1):14–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing 54(4):3–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Wind Y(J), Green PE, eds. Marketing Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects (Springer, Boston), 117–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) How Democrats want to put Republicans on the defensive on abortion. The New York Times Online (May 10), https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/10/us/politics/democrats-abortion-schumer-vote.html.Google Scholar
- (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 42(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, eds. (2006) The Construction of Preference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Losing hurts: The happiness impact of partisan electoral loss. J. Experiment. Political Sci. 3(1):44–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Comments on conjoint analysis with partial profiles. J. Marketing Res. 41(4):388–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psych. Sci. 9(5):340–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Will I like a “medium” pillow? Another look at constructed and inherent preferences. J. Consumer Psych. 18(3):155–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) The construction of preference. Amer. Psych. 50(5):364–371.Crossref, Google Scholar

