Meta-Organization Formation and Sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa

References

• Ahrne G, Brunsson N (2005) Organizations and meta-organizations. Scand. J. Management 21(4):429–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahrne G, Brunsson N (2008) Meta-Organizations (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin J, Stevenson H, Wei-Skillern J (2006) Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship, Theory Practice 30(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bang H (2003) Governance as Social and Political Communication (Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK).Google Scholar
• Berke P, Conroy M (2000) Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. J. Amer. Planning Assoc. 66(1):21–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkowitz H, Bor S (2017) Why meta-organizations matter: A response to Lawton et al., and Spillman. J. Management Inquiry 27(2):204–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkowitz H, Dumez H (2016) The concept of meta-organization: Issues for management studies. Eur. Management Rev. 13(2):149–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkowitz H, Bucheli M, Dumez H (2016) Collective CSR strategy and the role of meta-organizations: A case study of the oil and gas industry. J. Bus. Ethics 143(4):753–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berrone P, Cruz C, Gomez-Mejia L, Larraza-Kintana M (2010) Socioeconomic wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):82–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackler F (1993) Knowledge and theory of organizations: Organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management. J. Management Stud. 30(6):863–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Foster P (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management 29(6):991–1013.Google Scholar
• Borgatti S, Halgin D (2011) On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1168–1181.Link, Google Scholar
• Brint S, Karabel J (1991) Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American community colleges. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 337–360.Google Scholar
• Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM (2006) The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Admin. Rev. 66(s1):44–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bundy J, Shropshire C, Buchholtz A (2013) Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):352–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Ravallion M (2007) Absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981–2004. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(43):16757–16762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan R, Jonard N, Zimmerman J (2007) Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks. Management Sci. 53(7):1051–1067.Link, Google Scholar
• Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Ring P (2008) The field of inter-organizational relations: A jungle or an Italian garden? Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Ring P, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations (Oxford University Press, New York), 719–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin T, Ventresca M, Beal B (1999) The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue and directions. J. Management 25(3):317–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dagnino GB, Levanti G, Li Destri AM (2008) Evolutionary dynamics of inter-firm networks: A complex systems perspective. Baum JAC, Rowley T, eds. Network Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 25 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 67–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhanaraj C, Parkhe A (2006) Orchestrating innovation networks. Acad. Management J. 31(3):659–669.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro F, Etzion D, Gehman J (2015) Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organ. Stud. 36(3):363–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad ØD, Snow CC, Miles RE, Lettl C (2012) The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):734–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K, Locke K (2007) Composing Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Googins B, Rochlin S (2000) Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Bus. Soc. Rev. 105(1):127–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):619–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do organizational networks come from? Amer. J. Soc. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J (2006) Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):670–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Staudenmayer N (2000) Coordination neglect: How lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations. Staw BM, Sutton RI, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 153–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson G (1997) Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market. J. Management Stud. 34(6):921–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodgson G (2000) The concept of emergence in social sciences: Its history and importance. Emergence 2(4):65–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Illinitch A, D’Aveni R, Lewin A (1996) New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. 7(3):211–221.Link, Google Scholar
• Kates R, Dasgupta P (2007) African poverty: A grand challenge for sustainability practice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(43):16747–16750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koza M, Lewin A (1998) The coevolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3):255–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan R, Martin X, Noorderhaven (2006) When does trust matter to alliance performance? Acad. Management J. 49(5):894–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P, Lorsch J (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
• Le Ber MJ, Branzei O (2010) Value frame fusion in cross sector interactions. J. Bus. Ethics 94(Suppl 1):163–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Sablynski CJ, Burton JP, Holtom BC (2004) The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 47(5):711–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy D, Newell P (2000) Oceans apart? Business responses to global environmental issues in Europe and the United States. Environment 42(9):8–21.Google Scholar
• Maguire S, Allen P, McKelvey B (2011) Complexity and management: Introducing the SAGE Handbook. Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B, eds. The Sage Handbook of Complexity and Management (Sage, London), 1–26.Google Scholar
• Maguire S, McKelvey B, Mirabeau L, Öztas N (2006) Complexity science and organization studies. Clegg S, Hardy C, Lawrence P, Nord W, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd ed. (Sage, London), 165–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mair J, Marti I (2009) Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. J. Bus. Venturing 24(5):419–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mair J, Marti I, Ventresca M (2012) Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Acad. Management J. 55(4):819–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn M, Davis G (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason R (2007) The external environment’s effect on management and strategy: A complexity theory approach. Management Decision 45(1):10–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayhew BH (1980) Structuralism versus individualism: Part 1, shadowboxing in the dark. Soc. Forces 59(2):335–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell H, Agle B, Wood D (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):853–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 86(2):404–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paquin R, Howard-Grenville J (2013) Blind dates and arranged marriages: Longitudinal processes of network orchestration. Organ. Stud. 34(11):1623–1653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A, Wasserman S, Ralston D (2006) New frontiers in network theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):560–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Aleman P (2011) Collective learning in global diffusion: Spreading quality standards in a developing country cluster. Organ. Sci. 22(1):173–189.Link, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Staw B, Cummings L, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 295–336.Google Scholar
• Powell WW (1996) Inter-organizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. 152(1):197–215.Google Scholar
• Raab J, Kenis K (2009) Heading toward a society of networks: Empirical developments and theoretical challenges. J. Management Inquiry 18(3):198–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rangan S, Samii R, Wassenhove L (2006) Constructive partnerships: When alliances between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):738–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T, Golden-Biddle K, Germann K (2006) Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microporcesses of change. Acad. Management J. 49(5):977–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch A, Moorman C (2001) The acquisition and utilization of information in product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. J. Marketing 65(2):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rondinelli D, London T (2003) How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Acad. Management Executive 17(1):61–76.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optimal disc industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2007) Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1096–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W (2002) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, 5th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Selsky J, Parker B (2005) Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. J. Management 31(6):849–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Snow C, Miles R, Coleman H (1992) Managing 21st century network organizations. Organ. Dynam. 20(3):5–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spillman L (2018) Meta-organization matters. J. Management Inquiry 27(1):16–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2011) Integrating distributed work: Comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 32(8):849–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2014) The firm as a coordinating system: Evidence from software services offshore. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1253–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Starkey K, Barnatt C, Tempest S (2000) Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. television industry. Organ. Sci. 11(3):299–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Stephan U, Uhlaner L, Stride C (2015) Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(3):308–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(3):801–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracey P, Phillips N (2011) Entrepreneurship in emerging markets. Management Internat. Rev. 51(1):23–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H, Dooley K (2011) Introduction to the special issue: Towards the ecological style: Embracing complexity in organizational research. Organ. Stud. 32(6):729–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuertscher P, Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (2014) Justification and interlaced knowledge at ATLAS, CERN. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1579–1608.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Nadler D (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Google Scholar
• Valente M (2012) Theorizing firm adoption of sustaincentrism. Organ. Stud. 33(4):563–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valente M, Crane A (2010) Private enterprise and public responsibility in developing countries. Calif. Management Rev. 52(3):52–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Huber G (1990) Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organ. Sci. 1(3):213–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Vanneste P, Puranam P (2010) Repeated interactions and contractual detail: Identifying the learning effect. Organ. Sci. 21(1):186–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Vifell ÅC, Thedvall R (2012) Organizing for social sustainability: Governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations. Sustainability 8(1):50–58.Google Scholar
• Vurro C, Dacin T, Perrini F (2010) Institutional antecedents of partnering for social change: How institutional logics shape cross-sector social partnerships. J. Bus. Ethics 94:39–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Glynn M (2006) Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organ. Stud. 27(11):1639–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B (1988) Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. Wellman B, Berkowitz S, eds. Social Structures: A Network Approach (Cambridge University Press, New York), 19–61.Google Scholar
• Westley F, Vredenburg H (1997) Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organ. Sci. 8(4):381–403.Link, Google Scholar
• Wheeler J (2008) The impact of social environments on emotional, social, and cognitive competency development. J. Management Development 17(1):129–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wright G, Goodwin P (2002) Eliminating a framing bias by using simple instructions to “think harder” and respondents with management experience. Strategic Management J. 23:1059–1067.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Soda G (2009) Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar