Optimal Distinctiveness in the Console Video Game Industry: An Exemplar-Based Model of Proto-Category Evolution

References

• Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions—The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):586–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Nelson A, Tripsas M (2016) Who are you? … I really wanna know: Product identity and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry. Strategy Sci. 1(3):163–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Aoyama Y, Izushi H (2003) Hardware gimmick or cultural innovation? Technological, cultural, and social foundations of the Japanese video game industry. Res. Policy 32(3):423–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arsenault D (2009) Video game genres, evolution and innovation. J. Comput. Game Culture 3(2):149–176.Google Scholar
• Baetu I, Shultz TR (2010) Development of prototype abstraction and exemplar memorization. Ohlsson S, Catrambone R, eds. Proc. 32nd Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX), 814–819.Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsalou LW (1990) On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. Srull TK, Wyer RS, eds. Content and Process Specificity in the Effects of Prior Experiences. Advances in Social Cognition, Vol. 3 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 61–88.Google Scholar
• Benner M, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bod R (2009) From exemplar to grammar: A probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Sci. 33(4):752–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowker GC, Star SL (2000) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(5):475–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunner JS, Goodnow JJ, Austin GA (1956) A Study of Thinking (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Burns LR, Wholey DR (1993) Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(1):106–138.Google Scholar
• Carroll GR, Hannan MT (1989) Density dependence in the evolution of populations of newspaper organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 54(4):524–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Dunbar RLM, Shapira Z (2017a) How commitment to craftsmanship leads to unique value: Steinway and Son’s differentiation strategy. Strategy Sci. 2(1):13–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Porac J, Thomas H (2017b) Categories and competition. Strategic Management J. 38(1):64–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Negro G, Perretti F (2008) The structure of consensus: Network ties, legitimation and exit rates of feature U.S. film producer organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):145–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34:1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Durand R, Levine DI, Touboul S (2016) Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1597–1614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M-J, Hambrick DC (1995) Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Acad. Management J. 38(2):453–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen JB, Basu K (1987) Alternative models of categorization: Toward a contingent processing framework. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):455–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts KS, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the US home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Strang D (2006) When fashion is fleeting: Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting. Acad. Management J. 49:215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. 20(2):147–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmestri G, Greenwood R (2016) How Cinderella became a queen: Theorizing radical status change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):507–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Boulongne R (2017) Advancing research on categories for institutional approaches of organizations. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence T, Meyer RE, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. (Sage, Oxford, UK),647–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Rao H, Monin P (2007) Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations. Strategic Management J. 28(5):455–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J, Shugan SM (1997) Film critics: Influencers or predictors? J. Marketing 61(April):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epseland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Zhu DH (2008) Performance effects of imitative entry. Strategic Management J. 29(8):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleischer A (2009) Ambiguity and the equity of rating systems: United States brokerage firms, 1995–2000. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):555–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Rappa MA (1994) A sociocognitive model of technology evolution—The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5(3):344–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2013) Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Grodal S, Wooley JL (2013) Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organ. Sci. 24(2):395–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll G (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt S, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET, Bargh JA (1987) Social cognition and social perception. Annual Rev. Psych. 38:369–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homa D, Vosburgh R (1976) Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Learn. Memory 2(May):322–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homa D, Sterling S, Trepel L (1981) Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Learning Memory 7(6):418–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Grodal S (2015) Category taken-for-granted as a strategic opportunity: The case of light cigarettes, 1964–1993. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(1):28–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Roberts PW, Swaminathan A (2012) Evaluative schemas and the mediating role of critics. Organ. Sci. 23(1):83–97.Link, Google Scholar
• Izushi H, Aoyama Y (2006) Industry evolution and cross-sectoral skill transfers: A comparative analysis of the video game industry in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Environment Planning A 38(10):1843–1861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennings JE, Jennings PD, Greenwood R (2009) Novelty and new firm performance: The case of employment systems in knowledge-intensive service firms. J. Bus. Venturing 24:338–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT (2005) Behind the one-way mirror: Refraction in the construction of product market categories. Poetics 33:201–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT (2008) Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 73(2):270–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss P (2013) An ontological turn in categories research: From standards of legitimacy to evidence of actuality. J. Management Stud. 50:1138–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khaire M, Wadhwani DR (2010) Changing landscapes: The construction of meaning and value in a new market category—Modern Indian art. Acad. Managemet J. 53(6):1281–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence TB, Hardy C, Phillips N (2002) Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Acad. Management J. 45(1):281–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Leung MD, Sharkey AJ (2014) Out of sight, out of mind? The audience-side effect of multi-category membership in markets. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.Link, Google Scholar
• Lingle JH, Altom MW, Medin DL (1984) Of cabbages and kings: Assessing the extendibility of natural object concept models to social things. Wyer RS, Srull TK, eds. Handbook of Social Cognition (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 71–118.Google Scholar
• Loguidice B, Barton M (2009) Vintage Games: An Insider Look at the History of Grand Theft Auto, Super Mario, and the Most Influential Games of All Time (Focal Press, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Rao H (2004) Sources of durability and change in market classifications: A study of the reconstitution of product categories in the American mutual fund industry, 1944–1985. Soc. Forces 82(3):969–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medin DL, Schaffer MM (1978) Context theory of classification learning. Psych. Rev. 85(3):207–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mervis CB, Rosch E (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Annual Rev. Psych. 32:89–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy J, Tybout AM (1989) Schema incongruity as a basis for product evaluation. J. Consumer Res. 16(June):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2012) People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1001–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55:439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro G, Koçak Ö, Hsu G (2010) Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 31:3–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosofsky RM, Johansen MK (2000) Exemplar-based accounts of “multiple-system” phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psych. Bull. Rev. 7(3):375–402.Google Scholar
• Nosofsky RM, Palmeri TJ (1997) An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psych. Rev. 104(2):266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1997) Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. 18(9):697–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Palmeri TJ, Nosofsky RM (2001) Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. Section A: Human Experiment. Psych. 54(1):197–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classifications affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Keele SW (1968) On the genesis of abstract ideas. J. Experiment. Psych. 77(July):353–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Morrill C, Zald MN (2000) Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:237–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed SK (1972) Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psych. 3:382–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63:64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1975) Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psych. 7(4):532–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E, Lloyd BB (1978) Cognition and Categorization (L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Rosch E, Mervis CB (1975) Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psych. 7(October):573–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Patterson K (2009) Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in nineteenth-century America. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):486–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M, Scott WR (1998) A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):877–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M (2008) Interlopers and field change: The entry of U.S. news into the field of legal education. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):209–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR, Meyer JW (1991) The organization of societal sectors. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago),108–140.Google Scholar
• Shamsie J, Phelps C, Kuperman J (2004) Better late than never: A study of late entrants in household electrical equipment. Strategic Management J. 25(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2005) Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management 31(3):330–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrum WM (1991) Critics and publics: Cultural mediation in highbrow and popular performing arts. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(2):347–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrum WM (1996) Fringe and Fortune: The Role of Critics in High and Popular Art (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EB (2011) Identities as lenses: How organizational identity affects audiences’ evaluation of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(1):61–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EE, Medin DL (1981) Categories and Concepts (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith ER, Zarate MA (1992) Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psych. Rev. 99(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JD (2014) Prototypes, exemplars, and the natural history of categorization. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 21(2):312–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Kemler Nelson DG (1984) Overall similarity in adults’ classification: The child in all of us. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 113(1):137–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Minda JP (1998) Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 24(6):1411–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D (2010) Learning by Example: Imitation and Innovation at a Global Bank (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D, Macy MW (2001) In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):147–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strange S (1998) States and Markets (Continuum, New York).Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A (2015) Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strategic Management J. 36:437–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sujan M (1985) Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. J. Consumer Res. 12(June):31–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Prabhu JC, Chandy RK (2009) Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. J. Marketing 73:3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thagard P (1992) Conceptual Revolution (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tschang FT (2007) Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. 18(6):989–1005.Link, Google Scholar
• Verbeemen T, Vanpaemel W, Pattyn S, Storms G, Verguts T (2007) Beyond exemplars and prototypes as memory representations of natural concepts: A clustering approach. J. Memory Language 56(4):537–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne J-P (2012) Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed methods study of the global arms industry, 1996–2007. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1027–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS (1987) Thought and Language (Plenum Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Waguespack DM, Sorenson O (2011) The ratings game: Asymmetry in classification. Organ. Sci. 22(3):541–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• White HC (1992) Identity and Control: Structural Theory of Social Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wingfield N, Guth RA (2005) Why shortages of hot gifts endure as a Christmas ritual. Wall Street Journal (December 2):B1.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennings PD (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Lounsbury M (2013) Overcoming the illegitimacy discount: Cultural entrepreneurship in the US feature film industry. Organ. Stud. 34(12):1747–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D (2017) Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Zhou X (2011) Status inconsistency and product valuation in the California wine market. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1435–1448.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang XQ (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (2016) Optimal distinctiveness revisited: An integrative framework for understanding the balance between differentiation and conformity in individual and organizational identities. Pratt MG, Schultz M, Ashforth BE, Ravasi D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 183–199.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim T-Y, Ukanwa K, Von Rittmann J (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar