Social Media and the Development of Shared Cognition: The Roles of Network Expansion, Content Integration, and Triggered Recalling

References

• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):634–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker HS (1996) The epistemology of qualitative research. Jessor R, Colby A, Schweder R, eds. Essays on Ethnography and Human Development (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 53–71.Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1955) Dynamics of Bureaucracy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bonito JA (2004) Shared cognition and participation in small groups similarity of member prototypes. Comm. Res. 31(6):704–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The Social Life of Information (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Brzozowksi M (2009) WaterCooler: Exploring an organization through enterprise social media. Proc. 2009 Internat. Conf. Supporting Group Work, 219–228.Google Scholar
• Burke CS, Fiore SM, Salas E (2003) The role of shared cognition in enabling shared leadership and team adaptability. Pearce CL, Conger JA, eds. Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA), 103–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AF, Webster J (2005) Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace. Comput. Human Behav. 21(1):85–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (2001) Reflections on shared cognition. J. Organ. Behav. 22(2):195–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr CT, Walther JB (2014) Increasing attributional certainty via social media: Learning about others one bit at a time. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 19(4):922–937.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T (1998) Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Soc. Networks 20(4):331–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chui M, Manika J, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Roxburgh C, Sarrazin H, Sands Get al. (2012) The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. Report, McKinsey Global Institute, New York.Google Scholar
• Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. 7(2):119–135.Link, Google Scholar
• Contractor N, Monge PR (2002) Managing knowledge networks. Management Comm. Quart. 16(2):249–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison NB, Gibbs JL, Weber MS (2015) The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances. Amer. Behav. Scientist 59(1):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2011) Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media Soc. 13(6):873–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ensley MD, Pearce CL (2001) Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance. J. Organ. Behav. 22(2):145–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbs JL, Rozaidi NA, Eisenberg J (2013) Overcoming the “ideology of openness”: Probing the affordances of social media for organizational knowledge sharing. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 19(1):102–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Mehra A (1996) Sensemaking in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1226–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B (1965) The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc. Problems 12(4):436–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity (Sociological Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Hampton KN (2016) Persistent and pervasive community: New communication technologies and the future of community. Amer. Behav. Scientist 60(1):101–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampton KN, Lee CJ, Her EJ (2011) How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media Soc. 13(7):1031–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Cramton CD (2013) Situated coworker familiarity: How site visits transform relationships among distributed workers. Organ. Sci. 25(3):794–814.Link, Google Scholar
• Hubert LJ, Schultz J (1976) Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. 29(2):190–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson P, Klobas J (2008) Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories. Decision Support Systems 44(2):409–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarrahi MH, Sawyer S (2013) Social technologies, informal knowledge practices, and the enterprise. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce 23(1):110–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2008) Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting nation security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organ. Sci. 19(2):260–276.Link, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Alavi M, Labianca G, Borgatti SP (2014) What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS Quart. 38(1):274–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz N, Lazer D, Arrow H, Contractor N (2004) Network theory and small groups. Small Group Res. 35(3):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knoben J, Oerlemans LAG (2006) Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. Internat. J. Management Rev. 8(2):71–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1987) Cognitive social structures. Soc. Networks 9(2):109–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1990) Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2): 342–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut RE, Rice RE, Cool C, Fish RS (1998) Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organ. Sci. 9(4):437–453.Link, Google Scholar
• Lave J (1996) Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, Activity 3(3):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Meyer SR (2015) Social media as social lubricant: How ambient awareness eases knowledge transfer. Amer. Behav. Scientist 59(1):10–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Treem JW (2012) Knowledge management technology as a stage for strategic self-presentation: Implications for knowledge sharing in organizations. Inform. Organ. 22(1):37–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Vaast E (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):150–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Huysman M, Steinfield C (2013) Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 19(1): 1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Faraj S, Kane GC, Azad B (2013) The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 19(1):38–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge PR, Contractor NS (2003) Theories of Communication Networks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL (1999) Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups. Thompson LL, Levine JM, Messick DM, eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland RL, Argote L, Krishnan R (1996) Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. Nye JL, Brower AM, eds. What’s Social About Social Cognition (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA), 57–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nardi BA (2010) My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norman DA (1983) Some observations on mental models. Gentner D, Stevens A, eds. Mental Models (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 15–34.Google Scholar
• Oh O, Eom C, Rao HR (2015) Role of social media in social change: An analysis of collective sense making during the 2011 Egypt Revolution. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):210–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Palazzolo ET, Serb DA, She YC, Su CK, Contractor NS (2006) Coevolution of communication and knowledge networks in transactive memory systems: Using computational models for theoretical development. Comm. Theory 16(2):223–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park HS (2008) The effects of shared cognition on group satisfaction and performance politeness and efficiency in group interaction. Comm. Res. 35(1):88–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Perlow L, Weeks J (2002) Who’s helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 23(4):345–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto MB, Pinto JK, Prescott JE (1993) Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Sci. 39(10):1281–1297.Link, Google Scholar
• Razzouk R, Johnson T (2012) Shared cognition. Seel NM, ed. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (Springer, Boston), 3056–3058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Argote L (2011) Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):189–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Carley KM, Argote L (2006) The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Sci. 52(5):671–682.Link, Google Scholar
• Resnick LB (1991) Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. Resnick LB, Levine JM, Teasley SD, eds. Perspective on Socially Shared Cognition (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rice RE (1992) Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organ. Sci. 3(4):475–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Saunders CS, Ahuja MK (2006) Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and ongoing distributed teams. Small Group Res. 37(6):662–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Swaab R, Postmes T, van Beest I, Spears R (2007) Shared cognition as a product of, and precursor to, shared identity in negotiations. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(2):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson L, Fine GA (1999) Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 3(4):278–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson LL, Levine JM, Messick DM, eds. (1999) Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Toma C, Hancock J, Ellison N (2008) Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(8):1023–1036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tufecki Z (2008) Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace. Inform., Comm. Soc. 11(4):544–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yuan YC, Fulk J, Monge PR, Contractor N (2010) Expertise directory development, shared task interdependence, and strength of communication network ties as multilevel predictors of expertise exchange in transactive memory work groups. Comm. Res. 37(1):20–47.Crossref, Google Scholar