Learning by Contributing: Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Contribution to Crowdsourced Public Goods

References

• Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Novelli E (2013) The second face of appropriability: Generative appropriability and its determinants. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):248–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aksoy D, Fosfuri A, Giarratana M (2011) The impact of open source software on firm value. Proc. DRUID Soc. Conf., June 15–17, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
• Aksoy-Yurdagul D (2015) The impact of open source software commercialization on firm value. Indust. Innovation 22(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Alawi AI, Al-Marzooqi NY, Mohammed YF (2007) Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: Critical success factors. J. Knowledge Management 11(2):22–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy O, George G, Salter AJ (2013) Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity. Acad. Management Rev. 38(2):270–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman E, Nagle F, Tushman M (2015) Innovating without information constraints: Organizations, communities, and innovation when information costs approach zero. Hitt MA, Shalley C, Zhou J, eds. Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK),353–379.Google Scholar
• Anzai Y, Simon HA (1979) The theory of learning by doing. Psych. Rev. 86(2):124–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Ellison G (2014) Dynamics of open source movements. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):294–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attewell P (1992) Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. 3(1):1–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, von Hippel E (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1399–1417.Link, Google Scholar
• Belenzon S, Schankerman M (2015) Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(6):795–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and “the nature of the firm.” Yale Law J. 112(3):369–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergstrom T, Blume L, Varian H (1986) On the private provision of public goods. J. Public Econom. 29(1):25–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskarabhatla A, Hegde D (2014) An organizational perspective on patenting and open innovation. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1744–1763.Link, Google Scholar
• Biancani S, McFarland DA, Dahlander L (2014) The semiformal organization. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1306–1324.Link, Google Scholar
• Bianchi M, Lejarraga J (2016) Learning to license technology: The role of experience and workforce’s skills in Spanish manufacturing firms. R&D Management 46(S2):691–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4): 1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1996) Co-Opetition (Currency/Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 2002(1):137–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Llanes G (2011) Mixed source. Management Sci. 57(7):1212–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2006) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen R (1987) Plane Answers to Complex Questions: The Theory of Linear Models (Springer Texts in Statistics, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. 99(397):569–596.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1): 128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbet J (2008) How to participate in the Linux community. Accessed October 25, 2017, https://www.linux.com/publications/how-participate-linux-community.Google Scholar
• Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):522–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L (2007) Penguin in a new suit: A tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities. Indust. Corporate Change 16(5):913–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Magnusson MG (2005) Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy 34(4):481–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Wallin MW (2006) A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Res. Policy 35(8): 1243–1259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson JF (2014) Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. J. Bus. Psych. 29(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Min CK (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Sci. 43(12):1660–1675.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A, Moingeon B (1998) From organizational learning to the learning organization. Management Learn. 29(1):5–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman RG, Kemerer CF (1997) The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Sci. 43(10):1345–1363.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C (2005) The corporate digital divide: Determinants of Internet adoption. Management Sci. 51(4):641–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. J. Urban Econom. 58(3):389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2008) Understanding the inputs into innovation: Do cities substitute for internal firm resources? J. Econom. Management Strategy 17(2):295–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A, Giarratana MS, Luzzi A (2008) The penguin has entered the building: The commercialization of open source software products. Organ. Sci. 19(2):292–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1983) Learning-by-doing and market performance. Bell J. Econom. 14(2):522–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 12(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Nagle F (2014) Digital dark matter and the economic contribution of apache. Res. Policy 43(4):623–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith R, Redding S, Van Reenen J (2003) R&D and absorptive capacity: Theory and empirical evidence. Scandinavian J. Econom. 105(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Henkel J, von Hippel E (2003) Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy 32(10):1753–1769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Res. Policy 35(7):953–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel J, Schöberl S, Alexy O (2014) The emergence of openness: How and why firms adopt selective revealing in open innovation. Res. Policy 43(5):879–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herriott SR, Levinthal D, March JG (1985) Learning from experience in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):298–302.Google Scholar
• Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A (2002) The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Stud. Higher Ed. 27(1):53–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. 20(2):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Wu DJ (2013) IT knowledge spillovers and productivity: Evidence from enterprise software. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 2(1):88–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011a) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011b) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Clark KB (1994) Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change 3(3):557–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Taylor MS (1979) Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 64(4): 349–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2008) R&D/returns causality: Absorptive capacity or organizational IQ. Management Sci. 54(12):2054–2067.Link, Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2016) Outsourced R&D and GDP growth. Paper CES-WP-16-19, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.Google Scholar
• Knott AM, Bryce DJ, Posen HE (2003) On the strategic accumulation of intangible assets. Organ. Sci. 14(2):192–207.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (2000) The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management J. 21(3): 405–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Tushman M (2012) Open innovation and organizational boundaries: The impact of task decomposition and knowledge distribution on the locus of innovation. Grandori A, ed. Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organization Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 355–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Pathak PA, Tirole J (2006) The dynamics of open-source contributors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):114–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine SS, Prietula MJ (2013) Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1414–1433.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lifshitz-Assaf H (2017) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: From problem solvers to solution seekers. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print December 14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001839217747876.Google Scholar
• London M, Smither JW (2002) Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Rev. 12(1):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Rusnak J, Baldwin CY (2006) Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. 52(7):1015–1030.Link, Google Scholar
• Madison MJ, Frischmann BM, Strandburg KJ (2010) Constructing commons in the cultural environment. Cornell Law Rev. 95(4):657–709.Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2009) Perspective—the interdependence of private and public interests. Organ. Sci. 20(6): 1034–1052.Link, Google Scholar
• McElheran KS (2014) Delegation in multi-establishment firms: Adaptation vs. coordination in I.T. purchasing authority. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):225–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagle F (2018) Open source software and firm productivity. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 4, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2977.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Pacheco-de-Almeida G, Zemsky PB (2012) Some like it free: Innovators’ strategic use of disclosure to slow down competition. Strategic Management J. 33(7):773–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pashler H, Cepeda NJ, Wixted JT, Rohrer D (2005) When does feedback facilitate learning of words? J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 31(1):3–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge based, and measurement explanations for make or buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Chen JS (2013) An advantage of newness: Vicarious learning despite limited absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. 24(6): 1701–1716.Link, Google Scholar
• Raymond ES (1999) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary (O’Reilly Media, North Sebastopol, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5):S71–S102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson RC (2005) Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 26(11):1009–1031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T (2012) Standard setting committees: Consensus governance for shared technology platforms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1): 305–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonin BL (1997) The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization. Acad. Management J. 40(5):1150–1174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments? New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson P (2010) Learning by doing. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 429–476.Google Scholar
• Todorova G, Durisin B (2007) Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):774–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanneste BS, Puranam P (2010) Repeated interactions and contractual detail: Identifying the learning effect. Organ. Sci. 21(1): 186–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Volberda HW, Foss NJ, Lyles MA (2010) Perspective-absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. 21(4):931–951.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Walker G, Weber D (1984) A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(3):373–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open source software. R&D Management 36(3):319–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J, Lakhani KR (2008) Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Indust. Innovation 15(2):223–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar