The Influence of Multiple Knowledge Networks on Innovation in Foreign Operations

References

• Alcacer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Almeida P (1996) Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):155–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Phene A (2004) Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):847–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Grant R, Song J (1998) The role of international corporations in cross border knowledge transfer in the semiconductor industry. Hitt M, Ricart-Costa J, Nixon R, eds. Managing Strategically in an Interconnected World (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK), 119–148.Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman M (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson U, Forsgren M (2000) In search of centre of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management Internat. Rev. 40(4):329–350.Google Scholar
• Andersson U, Forsgren M, Holm U (2002) The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management J. 23(11):979–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asakawa K (1996) External-internal linkages and overseas autonomy-control tension: The management dilemma of the Japanese R&D in Europe. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 43(1):24–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry H (2006) Leaders, laggards and the pursuit of foreign knowledge. Strategic Management J. 27(2):151–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry H (2014) Global integration and innovation: Multi-country knowledge generation within MNCs. Strategic Management J. 35(6):869–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry H (2015) Knowledge inheritance in global industries: The impact of parent firm knowledge on the performance of foreign subsidiaries. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1438–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry H, Sakakibara M (2006) Resource accumulation and overseas expansion by Japanese multinationals. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 65(2):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanc H, Sierra C (1999) The internationalization of R&D by multinationals: A trade-off between external and internal proximity. Cambridge J. Econom. 23(2):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branstetter L, Fisman R, Foley CF (2006) Do stronger intellectual property rights increase technology transfer? Quart. J. Econom. 121(1):321–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckley P, Casson M (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise (MacMillan, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2): 349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantwell J (1989) Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Cantwell J, Janne O (1999) Technological globalization and innovation centers: The role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Res. Policy 28(2–3):119–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantwell J, Mudambi R (2005) MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management J. 26(12):1109–1128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christenson C, Rosenbloom R (1995) Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics and the value network. Res. Policy 24(2):233–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung W, Yeaple S (2008) International knowledge sourcing: Evidence from US firms expanding abroad. Strategic Management J. 29(11):1207–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contractor F, Kumar V, Kundu S, Pedersen T, eds. (2010) Global outsourcing and offshoring: In search of the optimal configuration for a company. Global Outsourcing and Offshoring (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 3–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Behrens DM (2005) When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Res. Policy 34(5):717–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doz Y, Santos J, Williamson P (2001) From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Knowledge Economy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enright M (2000) Regional clusters and multinational enterprises: Independence, dependence or interdependence? Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 30(2):114–138.Google Scholar
• Feenstra R, Hanson G (1997) Foreign direct investment and relative wages: Evidence from Mexico’s maquiladoras. J. Internat. Econom. 42(3–4):371–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss N (1997) Resources, Firms and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource Based Perspective (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Foss N, Pedersen T (2002) Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. J. Internat. Management 8(1):1–19.Google Scholar
• Frost T (2001) The geographical sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management J. 22(2):101–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frost TS, Birkinshaw JM, Ensign PC (2002) Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. 23(11):997–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J, Porter M, Stern S (2002) The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy 31(6):899–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ginarte J, Park W (1997) Determinants of patent rights: A cross national study. Res. Policy 26(3):283–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Govindarajan V (2000) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. 21(4):473–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton R (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Clark K (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz W (2000) The institutional environment for multinational investment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 16(2):334–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hines J (1995) Taxes, technology transfer and R&D by multinational firms. Feldstein M, Hines J, Hubbard R, eds. Taxing Multinational Corporations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 51–62.Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter T, Grone F (2009) Product and geographic scope changes of multinational enterprises in response to international competition. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(7):1149–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hymer S (1960) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Lasserre P (1996) Regional headquarters: The spearhead for Asia Pacific markets. Long Range Planning 29(1):30–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin X, Mitchell W (1998) The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Res. Policy 26(7–8):753–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro F (2015) Selective attention and the initiation of the global knowledge-sourcing process in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(5):505–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morck R, Yeung B (1991) Why investors value multinationality. J. Bus. 64(2):165–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nell P, Ambos B (2013) Parenting advantage in the MNC: An embeddedness perspective on the value added by headquarters. Strategic Management J. 34(9):1086–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance, and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. 6(3):239–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park W (2008) International patent protection: 1960–2005. Res. Policy 37(4):761–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phene A, Almeida P (2008) Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 39(5):901–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schleimer S, Pederson T (2014) The effects of MNC parent effort and social structure on subsidiary absorptive capacity. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(3):303–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schott PK (2004) Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):647–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Shane S (2001) Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Sci. 47(2):205–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J (2008) Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy 37(1):77–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song J, Asakawa K, Chu Y (2011) What determines knowledge sourcing from host locations of overseas R&D operations? A study of global R&D activities of Japanese multinationals. Res. Policy 40(3):380–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramaniam M, Youndt M (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad. Management J. 48(3):450–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G, Jensen R (2006) Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 27(10): 937–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A, Greve H (2006) Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. 49(4):723–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 5(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 7(1):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2005) Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. Report, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
• Yamin M, Andersson U (2011) Subsidiary importance in the MNC: What role does internal embeddedness play? Internat. Bus. Rev. 20(2):151–162.Crossref, Google Scholar