Fit for the Task: Complementarity, Asymmetry, and Partner Selection in Alliances

References

• Ahuja G (2000) The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. 21(3):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Giuseppe S, Zaheer A (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organ. Sci. 23(2):434–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Allison PD (2005) Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS. (SAS Publishing, Cary, NC).Google Scholar
• Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J. 14(1):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bae J, Gargiulo M (2004) Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 47(6):843–859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bjorkman I, Lu Y (2001) Institutionalization and bargaining power explanations of HRM practices in international joint ventures—The case of Chinese-Western joint ventures. Organ. Stud. 22(3):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Blodgett LL (1991) Partner contributions as predictors of equity share in international joint ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 22(1):63–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brouthers KD, Brouthers LE, Wilkinson TJ (1995) Strategic alliances: Choose your partners. Long Range Planning 28(3):2–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter JR, Kenward MG (2013) Multiple Imputation and Its Application. (Wiley, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T (2003) Determinants of governance structure in alliances: The role of strategic, task and partner uncertainties. Indust. Corporate Change 12(6):1223–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Piskorski MJ (2005) Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):167–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Park SH, Newburry W (2009) Parent contribution and organizational control in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1133–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi CB, Beamish PW (2004) Split management control and international joint venture performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 35(3):201–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung S, Singh H, Lee K (2000) Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 21(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contractor FJ, Lorange P (1988) Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economic basis for cooperative ventures. Contractor FJ, Lorange P, eds. Cooperative Strategies in International Business (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA), 3–30.Google Scholar
• Crowston K (1997) A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organ. Sci. 8(2):157–175.Link, Google Scholar
• Das TK, Teng BS (2000) A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. J. Management 26(1):31–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. 35(12):1504–1511.Link, Google Scholar
• Dill WR (1958) Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 2(4):409–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W (2004) Asymmetric performance: The market share impact of scale and link alliances in the global auto industry. Strategic Management J. 25(7):701–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eccles RG (1981) The quasifirm in the construction industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 2(4):335–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 7(2):136–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ennen E, Richter A (2010) The whole is more than the sum of its parts---or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. J. Management 36(1):207–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gail M, Williams R, Byar DP, Brown C (1976) How many controls? J. Chronic Diseases 29(11):723–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J (1985) Interorganizational relations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 11:281–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia-Canal EA, Valdés-Llaneza A, Ariño A (2003) Effectiveness of dyadic and multi-party joint ventures. Organ. Stud. 24(5):743–770.Google Scholar
• Geringer JM (1991) Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 22(1):41–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstman BB (2013) Epidemiology Kept Simple: An Introduction to Traditional and Modern Epidemiology, 3rd ed. (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex).Google Scholar
• Glaister KW, Buckley PJ (1996) Strategic motives for international alliance formation. J. Management Stud. 33(3):301–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandori A, Furlotti M (2010) Facio ut facias: Associational contracts and innovation. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 39(4):81–100.Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1439–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1969) Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research. Acta Psychologica 31:97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrigan KR (1985) Strategies for Joint Ventures. (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
• Harrison JS, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD (2001) Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. J. Management 27(6):679–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart JF (1988) A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management J. 9(4):361–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill RC, Hellriegel D (1994) Critical contingencies in joint venture management: Some lessons from managers. Organ. Sci. 5(4):594–607.Link, Google Scholar
• Hite JM (2008) The role of dyadic multi-dimensionality in the evolution of strategic network ties. Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, eds. Network Strategy. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 25 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 133–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied Logistic Regression. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Organ. Sci. 2(1):88–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalaignanam K, Shankar V, Varadarajan R (2007) Asymmetric new product development alliances: Win-win or win-lose partnerships? Management Sci. 53(3):357–374.Link, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. 21(3):217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz MH (2011) Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians and Public Health Researchers, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management J. 19(3):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1989) The stability of joint ventures: Reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J. Indust. Econom. 38(2):183–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor YY, Mahoney JT (2000) Penrose’s resource-based approach: The process and product of research creativity. J. Management Stud. 37(1):109–139.Google Scholar
• Lachmann L (1947) Complementarity and substitution in the theory of capital. Economica 14(54):108–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EJ, Yoon J (1996) Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(1):89–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Merges RP (1998) The control of technology alliances: An empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):125–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, Rumelt RP (2003) A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management J. 24(11):1069–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Logan JA (1996) Opportunity and choice in socially structured labor markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(1):114–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lundin RA, Soderholm A (1995) A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian J. Management 11(4):437–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mariti P, Smiley RH (1983) Co-operative agreements and the organization of industry. J. Indust. Econom. 31(4):437–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsuyama K (1995) Complementarities and cumulative processes in models of monopolistic competition. J. Econom. Literature 33(2):701–729.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2/3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitsuhashi H, Greve HR (2009) A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and compatibility. Acad. Management J. 52(5):975–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mjoen H, Tallman S (1997) Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organ. Sci. 8(3):257–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Nadler J, Thompson L, Boven LV (2003) Learning negotiation skills: Four models of knowledge creation and transfer. Management Sci. 49(4):529–540.Link, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE, Silverman BS (2008) Inter-firm alliances: A new institutional economics approach. Brousseau E, Glachant JM, eds. New Institutional Economics: A Textbook (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1991) Inter-firm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 22:579–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter MA, Fuller MB (1986) Coalitions and global strategy. Porter MA, ed. Competition in Global Industries (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 315–343.Google Scholar
• Powell, WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1132–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Boeker W (2008) Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 29(1):47–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley TJ, Greve HR, Rao H, Baum JAC, Shipilov AV (2005) Time to break up: Social and instrumental antecedents of firm exits from exchange cliques. Acad. Management J. 48(3):499–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarkar MB, Echambadi R, Cavusgil ST, Aulakh P (2001) The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 29(4):358–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah RH, Swaminathan V (2008) Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: The moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management J. 29(5):471–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soda G, Furlotti M (2017) Bringing tasks back in: An organizational theory of resource complementarity and partner selection. J. Management 43(2):348–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soda G, Usai A (1999) The dark side of dense networks: From embeddedness to indebtedness. Grandori A, ed. Interfirm Networks: Organization and Industrial Competitiveness (Routledge, London), 278–302.Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2008) Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):266–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stabell CB, Fjeldstad ØD (1998) Configuring value for competitive advantage: On chains, shops, and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(5):413–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action. (McGraw-Hill, New York)Google Scholar
• Wacholder S, McLaughlin JK, Silverman DT, Mandel JS (1992) Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. Principles. Amer. J. Epidemiology 135(9):1019–1028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Cobb JA, Aldrich HE (2013) More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):441–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan A, Gray B (2001) Antecedents and effects of parent control in international joint ventures. J. Management Stud. 38(3):393–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Castañer X, Souder D (2013) Synergy sources, target autonomy, and integration in acquisitions. J. Management 39(3):604–632.Crossref, Google Scholar