Signal Incongruence and Its Consequences: A Study of Media Disapproval and CEO Overcompensation

References

• Adut A (2005) A theory of scandal: Victorians, homosexuality, and the fall of Oscar Wilde. Amer. J. Sociol. 111:213–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Desender K, Bednar MK, Lee J (2015) Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):483–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):836–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 47(1):93–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bascle G (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. 6(3):285–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bednar MK (2012) Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Acad. Management J. 55(1):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bednar MK, Boivie S, Prince NR (2013) Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organ. Sci. 24(3):910–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Bishop M, Lemann N, Lublin J, Useem J (2005) The media and executive compensation: a panel discussion. Symposium on Bebchuk and Fried's Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation, Columbia University, New York, http://ssrn.com/abstract=869811.Google Scholar
• Bogle JC (2008) Reflections on CEO compensation. Acad. Management Perspect. 22:21–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brookman J, Jandik T, Rennie C (2006) A comparison of CEO compensation data sources. Financial Management Association Annual Meeting. Accessed February 4, 2018, http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Craig_Rennie.Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Busenbark J, Woo HS, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37:2639–2657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng IH, Hong H, Shue K (2015) Do managers do good with other peoples' money? Working Paper, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.Google Scholar
• Cohen T (2011) Debt crisis at crossroads for nonprofits. Philanthropy North Carolina, https://philnc.org/2011/08/01/debt-crisis-a-crossroads-for-nonprofits/.Google Scholar
• Core J, Guay W, Larcker D (2008) The power of the pen and executive compensation. J. Financial Econom. 88(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Hansen M, Zollo M (2016) The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Acad. Management J. 59(2):705–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Zollo M, Hansen M (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1429–1449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crystal G (1991) In Search of Excess. (Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Dahl MS, Dezső CL, Ross DG (2012) Fatherhood and managerial style: How a male CEO’s children affect the wages of his employees. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(4):669–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson JF, Richter AW (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. J. Appl. Psychol. 91(4):917–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D (2000) Media reputation as a strategic resource: an integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. J. Management. 26:1091–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D, Heugens P (2009) Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the infomediary process. J. Bus. Ethics. 86:541–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D, Suchman M. (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 49–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch CH (2008) Executive pay: A special report; a brighter spotlight, yet the pay rises. New York Times (April), https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/business/06comp.html.Google Scholar
• Di Giuli A, Kostovetsky L (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 111(1):158–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Vergne J-P (2015) Asset divestment as a response to media attacks in stigmatized industries. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1205–1223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Zingales L (2002) The corporate governance role of the media. Working paper, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Volchkova N, Zingales L (2008) The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. J. Finance. 63(3):1093–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman LB (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(6):1531–1576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach K, Kramer R (1996) Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Businessweek rankings. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41:442–476.Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Sci. 61(11):2549–2568.Link, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Neuberg SL, Beattie AE, Milberg SJ (1987) Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating process. J. Experiment. Social Psychol. 23:399–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gautier A, Pache A (2015) Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. J. Bus. Ethics. 126(3):343–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 30:777–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 30(4):425–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves SB, Waddock SA (1994) Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. 37:1034–1046.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurun UG (2016) Benefits of publicity. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.Google Scholar
• Hsieh YY, Vergne JP, Wang S (2018) The internal and external governance of blockchain-based organizations: Evidence from crypto-currencies. Campbell-Verduyn M, ed. Bitcoin and Beyond: Blockchains and Global Governance (Routledge, New York) 48–68.Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hansen MT, Kocak O (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Institute for Policy Research (2013) Following the public on inequality. Accessed June 10, 2015, http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/about/news/2013/mccall-undeserving-rich.html.Google Scholar
• Jensen M (2006) Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51:97–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joe JR, Louis H, Robinson D (2009) Managers’ and investors’ responses to media exposure of board ineffectiveness. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 44(3):579–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Greve H, Fujiwara-Greve T (2009) Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54:195–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Ocasio W, McDonnell M (2014) The structural elaboration of board independence: Executive power, institutional logics, and the adoption of CEO-only board structures in U.S. corporate governance. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1834–1858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk A (2009) With greater power comes greater responsibility? Takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management J. 30(3):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kay I, Van Putten S (2008) Executive pay: Regulation vs. market competition. Policy Anal. 619:1–14.Google Scholar
• King B, McDonnell M-H. (2015) Good firms, good targets: The relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World (Cambridge University Press, London), 430–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolev K, Wiseman RM, Gomez-Mejia LR (2017) Do CEOs ever lose? Fairness perspective on the allocation of residuals between CEOs and shareholders. J. Management 43(2):610–637.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhnen CM, Niessen-Rünzi A (2012) Public opinion and executive compensation. Management Sci. 58(7):1249–1272.Link, Google Scholar
• Lange D, Washburn N (2012) Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):300–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner M, Miller D (1978) Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychol. Bull. 85:1030–1051.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen P, Rodgers Z (2015) Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief. Strategic Management J. 36(5):776–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis J, Elfenbein H, Walsh JP (2007) Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working paper, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattingly JE, Berman SL (2006) Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenberg Domini ratings data. Bus. Soc. 45(1):20–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCall L (2013) The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution (Cambridge University Press, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1986) Price and advertising signals of product quality. J. Political Econom. 94:796–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishina Y, Block E, Mannor M (2012) The path dependence of organizational reputation: How social judgment influences assessments of capability and character. Strategic Management J. 33:459–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller A, Kräussl R (2011) Doing good deeds in times of need: A strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations. Strategic Management J. 32:911–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller A, Pfarrer M, Little L (2014) A theory of collective empathy in corporate philanthropy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 39(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nigam A, Ocasio W (2010) Event attention, environmental sense-making, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s healthcare reform initiative. Organ. Sci. 21(4):823–841.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M (2013) Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(3):238–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache A, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):455–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palia D (2001) The endogeneity of managerial compensation in firm valuation: A solution. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(3):735–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papke L, Wooldridge J (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. J. Appl. Econometrics 11:619–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park HD, Steensma HK (2012) When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Management J. 33:1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfarrer M, Decelles K, Smith K, Taylor M (2008) After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Acad. Management Rev. 33(3):730–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfarrer MD, Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2010) A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1131–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2003) Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. 46(5):631–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Yue L, Ingram P. (2010) Activists, categories, and markets: Racial diversity and protests against Walmart store openings in America. Hsu G, Negro G, Koçak O, eds. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution (Emerald Publishing, Jersey City), 235–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee M, Haunschild P (2006) The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the US automobile industry. Organ. Sci. 17(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Rutherford M, Buchholtz A, Brown JA (2007) Examining relationships between monitoring and incentives in corporate governance. J. Management Stud. 44(3):414–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short JC, McKenny AF, Ketchen DJ, Snow CC, Hult GTM (2016) An empirical examination of firm, industry, and temporal effects on corporate social performance. Bus. Soc. 55(8):1122–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine W, David R, Mitsuhashi H (2007) From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organ. Sci. 18(4):578–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Skowronski JJ, Carlston DE (1989) Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychol. Bull. 105(1):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (2002) Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):434–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Dukerich J, Zajac E (2014) Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 35(4):512–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su W, Sauerwald S (2018) Does corporate philanthropy increase firm value? The moderating role of corporate governance. Bus. Soc. 57(4):599–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan B, Haunschild P, Page K (2007) Organizations non gratae? The impact of unethical corporate acts on interorganizational networks. Organ. Sci. 18:55–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M. (2015) The institutional logics perspective. Scott R, Kosslyn S, eds. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource (Wiley, New York), 1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takacs Haynes K, Campbell JT, Hitt MA (2017) When more is not enough: Executive greed and its influence on shareholder wealth. J. Management 43(2):555–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP (2011) Toward a new measure of organizational legitimacy: Method, validation, and illustration. Organ. Res. Methods. 14(3):484–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP (2012) Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed-methods study of the global arms industry, 1996–2007. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1027–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vergne JP, Wry T (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. J. Management Stud. 51(1):56–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade JB, O’Reilly CA, Pollock TG (2006) Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organ. Sci. 17:527–544.Link, Google Scholar
• Waddock S (2003) Myths and realities of social investing. Organ. Environ. 16(3):369–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J, Seward J (1990) On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. 15(3):421–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Qian C (2011) Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Acad. Management J. 54(6):1159–1181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Rothschild D (2017) Rebuilding legitimacy in a post-truth age. Accessed January 20, 2017, https://medium.com/@duncanjwatts/rebuilding-legitimacy-in-a-post-truth-age-2f9af19855a5#.xjllnrfku.Google Scholar
• Weber K, Rao H, Thomas LG (2009) From streets to suites: How the anti-biotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):106–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal J, Deephouse D (2011) Avoiding bad press: Interpersonal influence in relations between CEOs and journalists and the consequences for press reporting about firms and their leadership. Organ. Sci. 22(4):1061–1086.Link, Google Scholar
• Westphal J, Park S, McDonald M, Hayward M (2012) Helping other CEOs avoid bad press social exchange and impression management support among CEOs in communications with journalists. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):217–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams RJ, Barrett JD (2000) Corporate philanthropy, criminal activity, and firm reputation: Is there a link? J. Bus. Ethics. 26:341–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Hambrick DC, Henderson AD (2011) Do CEOs encounter within-tenure settling up? A multiperiod perspective on executive pay and dismissal. Acad. Management J. 54(4):719–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younge KA, Tong TW, Fleming L (2015) How anticipated employee mobility affects acquisition likelihood: Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management J. 36(5):686–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1994) The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management J. 15(S1):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zavyalova A, Pfarrer M, Reger R, Hubbard T (2016) Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Acad. Management J. 59(1):253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zavyalova A, Pfarrer M, Reger R, Shapiro D (2012) Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1079–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar