# Results for Table 3 & 4

* **Result**: Table 3 reports the number of solved instances (out of 5 per configuration), the average running time of solved instances, and the average end optimality gap of unsolved instances for the four models. Table 4 reports the corresponding root gaps.   
* **Possible differences**: You may observe differences in running time compared to the paper. In particular, replication on personal computers may result in longer running times for the Conic model because solving MIECP models with MOSEK can be sensitive to hardware conditions. Despite these variations, the relative performance patterns across models remain consistent with the paper, with the **ENV model maintaining its dominant performance**.