INFORMS President-Elect Mark Daskin, who takes over the presidential reins on Jan. 1, 2006, came up through the publications ranks of the Institute. A former editor of Transportation Science and a former vice president of publications for INFORMS, Daskin also pioneered PubsOnline, the Institute’s initiative to make its journals available electronically.
Volume 32, Number 6, December 2005
DEPARTMENTS
Inside Story
Software Survey Saga
One of the more labor-intensive editorial exercises we conduct on a regular basis (besides gently arm-twisting the dozens of authors and columnists who graciously and without compensation contribute their time, expertise and writing skills to OR/MS Today) centers around software surveys. The survey process begins with the development of a suitable questionnaire authored by an experienced user with a deep understanding of the type of software to be surveyed. We also ask that same person to author a brief article that serves to both introduce the survey results and to bring our readers up to date on recent trends in the field.
President's Desk
Focus Best Minds on Most Important Problems
The tragedy of the great tsunami of December 2004 fills our minds and hearts as we begin 2005. As your new INFORMS president, I welcome the opportunity to speak with you in these columns. But it is hard to think narrowly of our profession when there is such sadness and suffering in South and Southeast Asia. We are all thinking about how we can help. We can offer cash donations, and many of us, I am sure, have done that.
Issues in Education
The Traveling Teaching Salesperson Problem
“OK, let me ask you a few questions,” I often say to undergraduate and master’s students who come to me for advice about what type of job they might enjoy. “First, what topics interested you the most in your courses?”
Cyberspace
The Washerman’s Dog: What is O.R.’s Domain?
I really enjoyed Pete Horner’s interview [1] with the new INFORMS president, Richard Larson, and Mike Rothkopf’s article [2] in the December 2004 issue of OR/MS Today, especially as my similarly motivated column, “The Science of Better What?” [3], appeared in the same issue. Larson talked about the success of O.R. being tied to the proportion of people at a random cocktail party recognizing the phrase “operations research” and that nine out of 10 people in his experience (at MIT parties?) were not able to do so. He also talked about O.R. giving birth to many fields – revenue management and [parts of] supply chain management, for instance – which never got connected with O.R. in the public eye. Rothkopf pointed out that “we are not well known.”Why don’t people recognize O.R.?
Was It Something I Said
Why Some Stop Banging the Drum
When I started at San Francisco State, my old friend and new colleague Robert Saltzman advised me to treat each course as a Continuous Improvement Project. This has proven to be good advice, for I’m always amazed, in retrospect, about how little I had actually known before teaching a class for the first time. Looking forward to the new semester, I’m inspired to get back to it, to strive for success, to go deeper into the mystery of how a teacher connects with and contributes to the students’ experience (what my friend Rich Murphy has dubbed “The Calculus of Intimacy”[1]). I feel lucky to have the chance to do it all over again.
Viewpoint
Caution: Bottoms-up Work Ahead
INFORMS President Richard Larson “looks to integrate his plan to bolster INFORMS membership through nonPh.D.s” (OR/MS Today, “The Science of Better Synergy,” December 2004). With a lead-in like that, my interest was aroused immediately. Not only do I not have a Ph.D., I work in industry, have no academic or government ties, and just attended my first INFORMS annual meeting.
ORacle
Napoleon’s Parable
The junior O.R. analyst was troubled and frustrated. “I just don’t see why this model isn’t tracking right,” he sputtered. “I’ve been over the code carefully, half a dozen times. I ran some test cases that came out right. But some of the data points we’re trying to forecast in the holdout sample are just way off. There don’t appear to be coding errors in the data, either – I’ve gone back and checked the bad points against source documents. Help, Carl! What more can I do?”

