February 5, 2020 in Resoundingly Human

Can doctor ego impact your diagnosis?

SHARE: PRINT ARTICLE:print this page https://doi.org/10.1287/orms.2020.01.24p

Operations research and analytics play a key role in advancing medical technology and methodology, with improvements to diagnostic testing, both conventional and AI-based tools, helping doctors more easily and accurately identify and treat medical conditions, providing better patient outcomes. 

But what happens if doctors aren’t using these tools, either out of concern over the costs incurred by the patient, or because they hold their own personal diagnostic abilities in higher regard, relying on that over diagnostic testing?

In this episode, I am joined by Tinglong Dai with the Johns Hopkins University Carey Business School and the Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, as well as his coauthor, Shubhranshu Singh also with the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, as well as the Krieger School of Arts & Sciences. Their research titled, “Conspicuous by its Absence: Diagnostic Expert Testing Under Uncertainty,” in the INFORMS journal Marketing Science, looks at barriers that stand in the way of more consistent adoption of diagnostic tools, including AI, that can aid in a physician’s diagnosis.

Want to learn more? Check out the additional resrouces and links listed below for more information about what was discussed in this episode.

Tinglong Dai website

Shubhranshu Singh website

"Conspicious by its Absence: Diagnostic expert testing under uncertainty," INFORMS journal Marketing Science

"Top doctors 'undertest' patients to demonstrate diagnostic prowess to peers, study finds," The Hub

Ashley Kilgore

SHARE:

INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.