Reply—Consider the Principal Finding: A Reply to William T. Ross

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.5.672

By focussing on issues concerning precise relative performance of the human and experimental teams, Ross obscures the major, and a priori surprising result of our study. This is that the experimental teams were not all dominated by the human teams. Replication is the appropriate way to illuminate the substantive issues raised by our study rather than arguments based on ex-post and possibly questionable statistical analyses.

INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.