Editorial: Special Issue on Corporate Purpose

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0199

Although occasionally assigned an alternate label, the concept of corporate purpose has deep roots in management and strategy (Barnard 1938, Follett 1940, Drucker 1954, Selznick 1957). Today its discussion in the corporate world has become widespread, with leaders devoting considerable time and attention to its development, expression, and deep diffusion. Corporate purpose has also become an important topic in academic strategy research.

As a concept, corporate purpose is of course distinct from strategy and by no means a synonym. Strategy is an expression that integrates and coordinates actions, marshals resources, and orchestrates choices into complementary patterns that solve a problem, achieve a goal, or deliver positions of value or advantage (Quinn 1980, Porter 1996, Van den Steen 2017, Leiblein et al. 2018). Yet, the concept of purpose is quite broad in its reach (Besharov and Mitzinneck 2023), and its breadth overlaps conceptually with strategy. Corporate purpose is often understood as a company’s reason for being (Durand 2023, Rindova and Martins 2023), as an expression of the meaning of work (Gartenberg 2023), as a mechanism that motivates and directs actions (Henderson 2021, Gartenberg and Zenger 2022), as a vehicle to build trust among various stakeholders (Gulati and Wohlgezogen 2023, Henisz 2023), as a catalyst for systemic change (Besharov and Mitzinneck 2023), as an institutionalized ideal that guides strategic decision making and practices (Ocasio et al. 2023), or as a broad stakeholder-oriented objective that transcends shareholder interests (Kaplan 2023). All these definitions connect in important ways to strategy.

In light of the functional proximity of strategy and corporate purpose, Strategy Science is pleased to publish a special issue on corporate purpose, edited by Matthew Kraatz, William Ocasio, and David Chandler. The issue features contributions from a distinguished set of scholars and an insightful introductory essay from the editors, entitled “Making Sense of Corporate Purpose” (Ocasio et al. 2023). Their title describes the issue’s contribution—a collection of papers that help readers make sense of corporate purpose. Their contributions address the topic from a wide range of theoretical and disciplinary perspectives and do so with varying forms of enthusiasm and occasional pessimism. You will enjoy the read and in doing so garner a deeper understanding of this concept so central to the field of strategy.

The papers in the Corporate Purpose Special Issue include the following:

Table

Table

Making Sense of Corporate Purpose
William Ocasio, Matthew Kraatz, and David Chandler
Inside-out and Outside-in Perspectives on Corporate Purpose
Juan (“John”) Almandoz
From the Boardroom: Making Purpose Research Relevant for Practice
Rodolphe Durand
The Value of Organizational Purpose
Witold J. Henisz
Moral Imagination, the Collective Desirable, and Strategic Purpose
Violina P. Rindova and Luis L. Martins
Accounts and Accountability: On Organizational Purpose, Organizational Identity, and Meaningful Work
Michael G. Pratt and Luke N. Hedden
Corporate Purpose in Comparative Perspective: The Role of Governance
Ruth V. Aguilera
Corporate Purpose: A Social Judgement Perspective
Roy Suddaby, Luca Manelli, and Ziyun Fan
Corporate Personhood and Fiduciary Duties as Critical Constructs in Developing Stakeholder Management Theory and Corporate Purpose
Joseph T. Mahoney
Systemic Symbolic Management, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Purpose: A Cautionary Tale
James D. Westphal
The Multiple Facets of Corporate Purpose: An Analytical Typology
Marya Besharov and Björn Mitzinneck
The New Stakeholder Theory on Organizational Purpose
Anita M. McGahan
The Contingent Relationship Between Purpose and Profits
Claudine Gartenberg
Can Purpose Foster Stakeholder Trust in Corporations?
Ranjay Gulati and Franz Wohlgezogen
The Promises and Perils of Corporate Purpose
Sarah Kaplan
Seeing Beyond the Here and Now: How Corporate Purpose Combats Corporate Myopia
Ju Young Lee, Pratima Bansal, and Alice Mascena Barbosa
Walking the Purpose-Talk Inside a Large Company: Sustainable Product Development as an Instance of Divergent Change
Marissa Kimsey, Thijs Geradts, and Julie Battilana

References

  • Barnard C (1938) The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Besharov M, Mitzinneck B (2023) The multiple facets of corporate purpose: An analytical typology. Strategy Sci. 8(2):233–244.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Drucker PF (1954) The Practice of Management (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Durand R (2023) From the boardroom: Making purpose research relevant for practice. Strategy Sci. 8(2):149–158.Google Scholar
  • Follett MP (1940) Dynamic Administration (Harper and Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gartenberg C (2023) The contingent relationship between purpose and profits. Strategy Sci. 8(2):256–269.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gartenberg C, Zenger T (2022) The firm as a subsociety: Purpose, justice, and the theory of the firm. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print December 19, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1650.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R, Wohlgezogen F (2023) Can purpose foster stakeholder trust in corporations? Strategy Sci. 8(2):270–287.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R (2021) Innovation in the 21st century: Architectural change, purpose, and the challenges of our time. Management Sci. 67(9):5479–5488.Google Scholar
  • Henisz WJ (2023) The value of organizational purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):159–169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2023) The promises and perils of corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):288–301.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein MJ, Reuer J, Zenger T (2018) What makes a decision strategic? Strategy Sci. 3(4):558–573.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W, Kraatz M, Chandler D (2023) Making sense of corporate purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):123–138.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74:61–78.Google Scholar
  • Quinn JB (1980) Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism (R.D. Irwin).Google Scholar
  • Rindova VP, Martins LL (2023) Moral imagination, the collective desirable, and strategic purpose. Strategy Sci. 8(2):170–181.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Van den Steen E (2017) Strategy and Strategic Decisions (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar