Assessing the Value of Flexibility in Large Projects

References

• Allaverdi D, Browning TR (2020) A methodology for identifying flexible design opportunities in large-scale systems. Systems Engrg. 23(5):534–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amram M, Kulatilaka N (1999) Uncertainty: The new rules for strategy. J. Bus. Strategy 20(3):25–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S (2006) Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Internat. J. Project Management 24(8):687–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atli K, Krystallis I (2025) Design flexibility in managing infrastructure projects: Contributing factors and research avenues. Internat. J. Project Management 43(1):102675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Rata C (2006) A survey study of factors influencing risk-taking behavior in real-world decisions under uncertainty. Decision Anal. 3(3):163–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandão LE, Dyer JS, Hahn WJ (2005) Using binomial trees to solve real-option valuation problems. Decision Anal. 2(2):69–88.Link, Google Scholar
• Brookes N, Sage D, Dainty A, Locatelli G, Whyte J (2017) An island of constancy in a sea of change: Rethinking project temporalities with long-term megaprojects. Internat. J. Project Management 35(7):1213–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardin M-A (2014) Enabling flexibility in engineering systems: A taxonomy of procedures and a design framework. J. Mech. Design 136(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman C, Ward S (2002) Managing Project Risk and Uncertainty (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Chiesa V, Coughlan P, Voss CA (1996) Development of a technical innovation audit. J. Product Innovation Management 13(2):105–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleland DI, Ireland LR (2006) Project Management: Strategic Design and Implementation (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Cooper R, Edgett S, Kleinschmidt E (2001) Portfolio management for new product development: Results of an industry practices study. R&D Management 31(4):361–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(5):1133–1137.Google Scholar
• Davies A, Dodgson M, Gann DM, MacAulay SC (2017) Five rules for managing large, complex projects. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 59(1):72–78.Google Scholar
• De-Meyer A, Loch CH, Pich MT (2002) Managing project uncertainty: From variation to chaos. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 43(2):60–67.Google Scholar
• De Neufville R, Scholtes S (2011) Flexibility in Engineering Design (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denicol J, Davies A, Krystallis I (2020) What are the causes and cures of poor megaproject performance? A systematic literature review and research agenda. Project Management J. 51(3):328–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRue DS, Ashford SJ, Myers CG (2012) Learning agility: In search of conceptual clarity and theoretical grounding. Indust. Organ. Psych. 5(3):258–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dvir D, Lechler T (2004) Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success. Res. Policy 33(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dvir D, Lipovetsky S, Shenhar AJ, Tishler A (2003) What is really important for project success? A refined, multivariate, comprehensive analysis. Internat. J. Management Decision Making 4(4):382–404.Google Scholar
• Edler J, Meyer-Krahmer F, Reger G (2002) Changes in the strategic management of technology: Results of a global benchmarking study. R&D Management 32(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson PE, Larsson J, Pesämaa O (2017) Managing complex projects in the infrastructure sector—A structural equation model for flexibility-focused project management. Internat. J. Project Management 35(8):1512–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilad A, Tishler A (2023) Mitigating the risk of advanced cyber attacks: The role of quality, covertness and intensity of use of cyber weapons. Defence Peace Econom. 34(6):726–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilad A, Tishler A (2024) Measuring and mitigating the risk of advanced cyber attackers. Decision Anal. 21(4):215–234.Link, Google Scholar
• Grote G, Kolbe M, Waller MJ (2018) The dual nature of adaptive coordination in teams: Balancing demands for flexibility and stability. Organ. Psych. Rev. 8(2–3):125–148.Google Scholar
• Harel Y, Gal IB, Elovici Y (2017) Cyber security and the role of intelligent systems in addressing its challenges. ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems Tech. 8(4):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassanzadeh F, Nemati H, Sun M (2014) Robust optimization for interactive multiobjective programming with imprecise information applied to R&D project portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 238(1):41–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huchzermeier A, Loch CH (2001) Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Sci. 47(1):85–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2015) Mixing quantitative and qualitative research. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research (Routledge, Oxford, UK), 423–433.Google Scholar
• Keisler JM, Bordley RF (2015) Project management decisions with uncertain targets. Decision Anal. 12(1):15–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Krystallis I, Laraqui Mahi ZAA, Di Maddaloni F (2024) Flexible infrastructure design: A real options reasoning approach to navigating uncertainty in large-scale projects. J. Management Engrg. 40(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Link AN, Wright M (2015) On the failure of R&D projects. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 62(4):442–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lock D (2007) Project Management, 9th ed. (Gower, Aldershot, UK).Google Scholar
• Miller R, Hobbs B (2005) Governance regimes for large complex projects. Project Management J. 36(3):42–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller WL, Morris L (1999) Fourth Generation R&D: Managing Knowledge, Technology and Innovation (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Morris PA, Teisberg EO, Kolbe AL (1991) When choosing R&D projects, go with long shots. Res. Tech. Management 34(1):35–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan VK (2001) Managing Technology and Innovation for Competitive Advantage (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Perminova O, Gustafsson M, Wikström K (2008) Defining uncertainty in projects. A new perspective. Internat. J. Project Management 26(1):73–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto JK, Slevin DP (1997) Project Success: Definitions and Measurement Techniques (Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA).Google Scholar
• Pinto JK, Davis K, Ika LA, Jugdev K, Zwikael O (2022) Coming to terms with project success: Current perspectives and future challenges. Internat. J. Project Management 40(7):831–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute (2021) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 7th ed. (Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA).Google Scholar
• Salazar-Kish JM (2001) Modeling concurrency tradeoffs and their effects on project duration and rework. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Santiago LP, Vakili P (2005) On the value of flexibility in R&D projects. Management Sci. 51(8):1206–1218.Link, Google Scholar
• Setter O, Tishler A (2007) Theory and application to the US military. Defence Peace Econom. 18(2):133–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ (1993) From low- to high-tech project management. R&D Management 23(3):199–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ, Dvir D (2007) Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ, Dvir D, Levy O, Maltz AC (2001) Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning 34(6):699–725. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenhar A, Holzmann V (2017) The three secrets of megaproject success: Clear strategic vision, total alignment, and adapting to complexity. Project Management J. 48(6):29–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Hitt MA (2004) Strategic flexibility: Organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. Acad. Management Perspect. 18(4):44–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JE (2005) Alternative approaches for solving real-options problems. Decision Anal. 2(2):89–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Symeonidis G (2003) Comparing Cournot and Bertrand equilibria in a differentiated duopoly with product R&D. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(1):39–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tishler A (2008) How risky should an R&D program be? Econom. Lett. 99(2):268–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tishler A, Milstein I (2009) R&D wars and the effects of innovation on the success and survivability of firms in oligopoly markets. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(4):519–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis L (1996) Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar