Rhetoric Mining: A New Text-Analytics Approach for Quantifying Persuasion

References

• Abbasi A, Chen H (2009) A comparison of fraud cues and classification methods for fake escrow website detection. Inform. Tech. Management 10(2):83–101.Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Chen H, Writeprints H (2008) A stylometric approach to identity-level identification and similarity detection in cyberspace. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 26(2):7.Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Zhou Y, Deng S, Zhang P (2018) Test analytics to support sense-making in social media: A language-action perspective. MIS Quart. 42(2):427–464.Google Scholar
• Abrahams A, Jiao J, Wang GA, Fan W (2012) Vehicle defect discovery from social media. Decision Support Systems 54:87–97.Google Scholar
• Abrahams A, Fan W, Wang GA, Zhang Z, Jiao J (2015) An integrated text analytic framework for product defect discovery. Production Oper. Management.26(4):975–990.Google Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Singh H (2013) Differential influence of blogs across different stages of decision making: The case of venture capitalists. MIS Quart. 37(4):1093–1112.Google Scholar
• Althusser L (1971) Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Althusser L, ed. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (Monthly Review Press, New York), 100–140.Google Scholar
• Altschul S, Madden T, Schaffer A (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protain database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(17):3389–3402.Google Scholar
• Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D (1990) Basic molecular alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215(3):403–410.Google Scholar
• Andreotta M, Nugroho R, Hurlstone M, Boschetti F, Farrell S, Walker I, Paris C (2019) Analyzing social media data: A mixed-methods framework combining computational and qualitative text analysis. Behav. Res. Methods 51(4):1766–1781.Google Scholar
• Anthony L, Lashkia G (2006) Mover: A machine learning tool to assist in the reading and writing of technical papers. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 46(3):185–193.Google Scholar
• Antons D, Joshi A, Salge T (2019) Content, contribution, and knowledge consumption: Uncovering hidden topic structure and rhetorical signals in scientific texts. J. Management 45(7):3035–3076.Google Scholar
• Antweiler W, Frank M (2005) Is all that talk just noise? The information content of Internet stock message boards. J. Finance 59(3):1259–1294.Google Scholar
• Archak N, Ghose N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis P (2011) Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Sci. 57(8):1485–1509.Link, Google Scholar
• Aristotle (1991) On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by Kennedy G (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Backus J, Bauer J, Bauer F, Green F, Green J, Katz J, Katz C et al. (1963) Revised report on the algorithmic language Algol 60. Comm. ACM 6:1–17.Google Scholar
• Bao Y, Datta A (2014) Simultaneously discovering and quantifying risk types for textual risk disclosures. Management Sci. 60(6):1371–1391.Link, Google Scholar
• Baroni P, Giacomin P, Giacomin M, Guida G (2005) SCC-recursiveness: A general schema for argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence 168:(1–2):162–210.Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Heracleous L, Walsham G (2013) A rhetorical approach to IT diffusion: Reconceptualizing the ideology-framing relationship in computerization movements. MIS Quart. 37(1):201–220.Google Scholar
• Berry D (2012) Understanding Digital Humanities (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Bitzer L (1968) The rhetorical situation. Philosophy Rhetoric 1(1):1–14.Google Scholar
• Blei D, Ng A, Jordan M (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learning Res. 3(0):993–1022.Google Scholar
• Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, et al. (2020) Language models are few-shot learners. Preprint, submitted May 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165.Google Scholar
• Buntine W (1996) A guide to the literature on learning probabilistic networks from data. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 8(2):195–210.Google Scholar
• Burke K (1969) A Grammar of Motives (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Butler J (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Cascavilla G, Conti M, Schwartz D, Yahav I (2015) Revealing censored information through comments and commenters in online social networks. Pei J, Silvestri F, Tang J, eds. ASONAM’15 Proc. 2015 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Adv. Soc. Networks Anal. Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 675–680.Google Scholar
• Chai D, Wu W, Han Q, Wu F, Li J (2020) Description based text classification with reinforcement learning. Preprint, submitted February 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.03067.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic vs. systematic information processing and the use of source vs. message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):752–766.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S, Trope Y (1999) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti P, Fry M (2022) A mixed-methods framework for analyzing text data: Integrating computational techniques with qualitative methods in demography. Demographic Res. 37:1351–1381.Google Scholar
• Cheung C, Sia C, Kuan K (2012) Is this review believable? a study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(8):2.Google Scholar
• Choi J, Cardie C, Riloff E, Patwardhan S (2005) Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. HLT’05 Proc. Conf. Human Language Tech. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 355–362.Google Scholar
• Choi T, Cheng T, Zhao X, Chan H, Wnag X, Lacka E, Zhang M (2016) A mixed-method approach to extracting the value of social media data. Production Oper. Management 25(3):568–583.Google Scholar
• Cowie J, Lehnert W (1996) Information extraction. Comm. ACM 39(1):80–91.Google Scholar
• Craven M, DiPasquo D, Freitag D, McCallum A, Mitchell T, Nigam K, Slattery S (2000) Learning to construct knowledge bases from the World Wide Web. Artificial Intelligence 118(1):69–113.Google Scholar
• Creswell J, Plano V (2011) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Das S, Chen M (2007) Yahoo! for Amazon: Sentiment extraction from small talk on the web. Management Sci. 53(9):1375–1388.Link, Google Scholar
• Devlin J, Chang M, Lee K, Toutanova K (2018) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Preprint, submitted October 11, http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805.Google Scholar
• Fairclough N (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Fang X, Hu P (2018) Top persuader prediction for social networks. MIS Quart. 42(2):1–59.Google Scholar
• Feltrim V, Teufel S, Nunes M, Alurisio S (2006) Argumentative zoning applied to critiquing novices’ scientific abstracts. Shanahan J, Qu Y, Wiebe J, eds. Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 233–247.Google Scholar
• Feng F, Yang Y, Cer D, Arivazhagan N, Wang W (2020) Language-agnostic BERT sentence embedding. Preprint, submitted July 3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01852.Google Scholar
• Ficcadenti V, Cerqueti R, Ausloos M (2019) A joint text mining-rank size investigation of the rhetoric structures of the US presidents’ speeches. Expert Systems Appl. 123:127–142.Google Scholar
• Fleiss J (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed. (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Flores F, Ludlow J (1980) Doing and speaking in the office. Fick G, Sprague R, eds. Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges (Pergamon Press, New York), 95–118.Google Scholar
• Gaizauskas R, Wilks Y (1998) Information extraction: Beyond document retrieval. J. Documentation 54(1):70–105.Google Scholar
• Geertz C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures, 2nd ed. (Basic, New York).Google Scholar
• Geisler C (2016) Current and emerging methods in the rhetorical analysis of texts—introduction: Toward an integrated approach. J. Writing Res. 7(3):417–424.Google Scholar
• Gildea D, Jurafsky D (2002) Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Comput. Linguistics 28(3):245–288.Google Scholar
• Glancy F, Yadav S (2011) A computational model for financial reporting fraud detection. Decision Support Systems. 50(0):595–601.Google Scholar
• Glass K, Colbaugh R (2012) Agile detection of framing rhetoric in social media. 2012 IEEE Internat. Conf. Intelligence Security Informatics (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 120–122.Google Scholar
• Goh KY, Heng CS, Lin Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Grasso F (2002) Toward computational rhetoric. Informal Logic 22(3):195–229.Google Scholar
• Grishman R (1997) Information extraction: Techniques and challenges. Pazienza MT, ed. Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology (Springer, Berlin), 10–27.Google Scholar
• Habermas J (1984) Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by McCarthy TA (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hamad E, Savundranayagam M, Holmes J, Kinsella E, Johnson A (2016) Toward a mixed-methods research approach to content analysis in the digital age: The combined content-analysis model and its applications to healthcare Twitter feeds. J. Medical Internet Res. 18(3):e60.Google Scholar
• Han J, Chen Q, Liu J, Luo X, Fan W (2018) The persuasion of borrowers’ voluntary information in peer to peer lending: An empirical study based on elaboration likelihood model. Comput. Human Behav. 78(January):200–214.Google Scholar
• Harris Z (1962) String Analysis of Sentence Structure (Mouton, The Hague).Google Scholar
• Hill S, Ready-Campbell N (2011) Expert stock picker: The wisdom of (experts in) crowds. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 15(3):73–102.Google Scholar
• Hromada D (2011) Initial experiments with multilingual extraction of rhetoric figures by means of PERL-compatible regular expressions. Proc. Second Student Res. Workshop Associated RANLP 2011 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 85–90.Google Scholar
• Ihlen Ø, Toledano M, Just S (2021) Using rhetorical situations to examine and improve vaccination communication. Frontiers Comm. 6:697383.Google Scholar
• Irving R (2004) Plagiarism and collusion detection using the Smith-Waterman algorithm. Technical Report TR-2004-164, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
• Ishizaki S, Kaufer D (2012) Computer-aided rhetorical analysis. McCarthy PM, Boonthum-Denecke C, eds. Applied Natural Language Processing: Identification Investigation and Resolution (IGI Global, Hershey, PA).Google Scholar
• Ives B, Learmonth G (1984) The information system as a competitive weapon. Comm. ACM 27(12):1193–1201.Google Scholar
• Johannesson P (2001) A language/action based approach to information modeling. Rossi M, Siau K, eds. Information Modeling in the New Millennium (IGI Global, Hershey, PA), 94–109.Google Scholar
• Johnson S, Safadi H, Faraj S (2015) The emergence of online community leadership. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):165–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnston A, Warkentin M, Siponen M (2015) An enhanced fear appeal rhetorical framework: Leveraging threats to the human asset through sanctioning rhetoric. MIS Quart. 39(1):113–134.Google Scholar
• Jones K (1988) A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Willett P, ed. Document Retrieval Systems Taylor Graham Series in Foundations of Information Science (Taylor Graham Publishing, London), 132–142.Google Scholar
• Józefowicz R, Vinyals O, Schuster M, Shazeer N, Wu Y (2016) Exploring the limits of language modeling. Preprint, submitted February 7, http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02410.Google Scholar
• Kalyan K, Rajasekharan A, Sangeetha S (2021) AMMUS: A survey of transformer-based pretrained models in natural language processing. Preprint, submitted August 12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05542.Google Scholar
• Khodabandelou G, Hug C, Salinesi C (2014) A novel approach to process mining: Intentional process models discovery. 2014 IEEE Eighth Internat. Conf. Res. Challenges Inform. Sci. RCIS (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Kim D, Benbasat I (2006) The effects of trust-assuring arguments on consumer trust in Internet stores: Application of Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):286–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim D, Ferrin D, Rao H (2009) Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful ecommerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):237–257.Link, Google Scholar
• Krajewski L, Ritzman L (2004) Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Krippendorf K (2004) Content Analysis (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Kupiec J (1992) Robust part-of-speech tagging using a hidden Markov model. Comput. Speech Language 6:225–242.Google Scholar
• Kuypers J, ed. (2009) Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action (Lexington Books, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
• Lacity M, Janson M (1994) Understanding qualitative data: A framework of text analysis methods. J. Management Inform. Systems 11(2):137–155.Google Scholar
• Lakeoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lash M, Zhao K (2016) Early predictions of movie success: The who, what, and when of profitability. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(3):874–903.Google Scholar
• Lassmann T, Sonnhammer E (2005) Kalign—An accurate and fast multiple sequence alignment algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 6(1):1–9.Google Scholar
• Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Preprint, submitted May 16, http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4053.Google Scholar
• Li W, Chen H, Nunamaker J (2016) Identifying and profiling key sellers in cyber carding community: AZSecure text mining system. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(4):1059–1086.Google Scholar
• Lia Q, Wanga T, Gonga Q, Chenb Y, Linc Z, Song S (2014) Media-aware quantitative trading based on public web information. Decision Support Systems 61(0):93–105.Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Karahanna E (2017) The dark side of reviews: The swaying effects of online product reviews on attribute preferences construction. MIS Quart. 41(2):427–448.Google Scholar
• Liu W, Zhou P, Zhao Z, Wang Z, Ju Q, Deng H, Wang P (2019a) K-BERT: Enabling language representation with knowledge graph. Preprint, submitted September 17, http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.07606.Google Scholar
• Liu X, He P, Chen W, Gao J (2019b) Multi-task deep neural networks for natural language understanding. Preprint, submitted January 31, http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.11504.Google Scholar
• Loughran T, McDonald B (2011) When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. J. Finance 66(1):35–65.Google Scholar
• Lowry P, Moody G, Vance A, Jensen M, Jenkins J, Wells T (2012) Using an elaboration likelihood approach to better understand the persuasiveness of website privacy assurance cues for online consumers. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 63(4):755–766.Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Jerath K, Singh P (2013) The emergence of opinion leaders in a networked online community: A dyadic model with time dynamics and a heuristic for fast estimation. Management Sci. 59(8):1783–1799.Link, Google Scholar
• Ludwig S, Laer TV, Ruyter K, Friedman M (2016) Untangling a web of lies: Exploring automated detection of deception in computer-mediated communication. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(2):511–541.Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K (1985) Implications of theories of language for information systems. MIS Quart. 9(1):61–74.Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz J (2010) The co-construction of credibility in online product reviews. Tech. Comm. Quart. 19(0):403–426.Google Scholar
• Mai F, Shan Z, Bai Q, Wang X, Chiang R (2018) How does social media impact Bitcoin value? A test of the silent majority hypothesis. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):19–52.Google Scholar
• Markle-Hub J, Feueeriegel S, Prendinger H (2017) Improving sentiment analysis with document-level semantic relationships from rhetoric discourse structures. Proc. 50th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI), 1142–1151. https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/182422.Google Scholar
• McClosky D (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics. (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
• Measell JS (1976) Rhetorical criticism: Genre criticism—counter statements: Whither genre? (or, genre withered?). Rhetoric Soc. Quart. 6(1):1–4.Google Scholar
• Menon V, Sabdhi M, Harikumar K, Soman K (2018) Semantic analysis using pairwise sentence comparison with word embeddings. Thampi S, Mitra S, Mukhopadhyay J, Li KC, James A, Berretti S, eds. Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 268–278.Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Burges CJ, Bottou L, Welling M, Ghahramani Z, Weinberger KQ, eds. NIPS’13 Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol 2 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 3111–3119.Google Scholar
• Miller C (1990) The rhetoric of decision science, or Herbert A. Simon says. Simon H, ed. The Rhetorical Turn (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 162–184.Google Scholar
• Monteserin A, Amandi A (2015) Whom should I persuade during a negotiation? An approach based on social influence maximization. Decision Support Systems 77(0):1–20.Google Scholar
• Mount D (2004) Bioinformatics: Sequence and Genome Analysis, 2nd ed. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY).Google Scholar
• Needleman S, Wunsch C (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 48(3):443–453.Google Scholar
• Neuendorf K (2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Notredame C, Higgins D (1996) SAGA: Sequence alignment by generic algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 24(8):1515–1524.Google Scholar
• O’Connor C, Joffee H (2020) Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. Internat. J. Qualitative Methods 19:1–13.Google Scholar
• Oehmen C, Nieplocha J (2006) ScalaBLAST: A scalable implementation of BLAST for high-performance data-intensive bioinformatics analysis. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 17(8):740–749.Google Scholar
• Oh C, Sheng O (2011) Investigating predictive power of stock micro blog sentiment in forecasting future stock price directional movement. Proc. 32nd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221599803_Investigating_Predictive_Power_of_Stock_Micro_Blog_Sentiment_in_Forecasting_Future_Stock_Price_Directional_Movement.Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K, Tan S, Pham DS, Bateman J, Moere A (2016) A digital mixed methods research design: Integrating multimodal analysis with data mining and information visualization for big data analytics. J. Mixed Methods Res. 12(1):11–30.Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M (2009) Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(1):485–500.Google Scholar
• Ordenes F, Grewal D, Ludwig S, Ruyter K, Mahr D, Wetzels M (2019) Cutting through content clutter: How speech and image acts drive consumer sharing of social media brand messages. J. Consumer Res. 45(5):988–1012.Google Scholar
• Parks L, Peters W (2022) Natural language processing in mixed-methods text analysis: A workflow approach. Internat. J. Soc. Res. Methodology, ePub ahead of print January 12, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.2018905.Google Scholar
• Pendra N, Cotos E (2008) Automatic identification of discourse moves in scientific article introductions. Proc. Third Workshop Innovative Use NLP Building Ed. Appl. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 62–70.Google Scholar
• Pennington J, Socher R, Manning C (2014) GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. Proc. 2014 Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing EMNLP (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 1532–1543.Google Scholar
• Peters M, Neumann M, Iyyer M, Gardner M, Clark C, Lee K, Zettlemoyer L (2018) Deep contextualized word representations. Preprint, submitted February 15, http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05365.Google Scholar
• Petty R, Cacioppo J, Goldman R (1981) Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 41(5):847–855.Google Scholar
• Pollach I (2012) Taming textual data: The contribution of corpus linguistics to computer-aided text analysis. Organ. Res. Methods 15(2):263–287.Google Scholar
• Porter M (1980) An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3):130–137.Google Scholar
• Porter M (2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86:79–93.Google Scholar
• Punyakanok V, Roth D, Yih W (2008) The importance of syntactic parsing and inference in semantic role labeling. Comput. Linguistics 34(2):257–287.Google Scholar
• Rittgen P (2006) A language-mapping approach to action-oriented development of information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(1):70–81.Google Scholar
• Robert L, Dennis A, Hung Y (2009) Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(2):241–279.Google Scholar
• Sager N, Friedman C, Lyman M (1987) Medical Language Processing: Computer Management of Narrative Data (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
• Searle J (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Siering M, Koch J, Deokar A (2016) Detecting fraudulent behavior on crowdfunding platforms: The role of linguistic and content-based cues in static and dynamic contexts. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(2):421–455.Google Scholar
• Simons H, ed. (1990) The Rhetorical Turn: Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of Inquiry (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Smith T, Waterman M (1981) Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147:195–197.Google Scholar
• Stone P, Dunphy D, Ogilvie D (1966) The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Taboada M, Mann W (2006) Applications of rhetorical structure theory. Discourse Stud. 8(4):567–588.Google Scholar
• Teufel S, Moens M (2002) Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Comput. Linguistics 28(4):409–445.Google Scholar
• Thoppilan R, Freitas DD, Hall J, Shazeer N, Kulshreshtha A, Cheng H, Jin A, et al. (2022) LaMDA: Language models for dialog applications. Preprint, submitted January 20, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08239.Google Scholar
• Toulmin S (1958) The Uses of Argument (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Toutanova K, Manning C (2000) Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. Proc. Joint SIGDAT Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing Very Large Corpora (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 63–70.Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown S, Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quart. 37(1):21–54.Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown S, Sullivan Y (2016) Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(7):435–495.Google Scholar
• Wang G, Liu X, Fan W (2011) A knowledge adoption model based framework for finding helpful user-generated contents in online communities. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, 1–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221599363_A_Knowledge_Adoption_Model_Based_Framework_for_Finding_Helpful_User-Generated_Contents_in_Online_Communities.Google Scholar
• Wang GA, Wang HJ, Li J, Abrahams AS, Fan W (2015) An analytical framework for understanding knowledge-sharing processes in online Q&A communities. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 5(4):18.Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Liu P, Zhu Z, Yin H, Zhang Q, Zhang L (2019) A text abstraction summary model based on BERT word embedding and reinforcement learning. Appl. Sci. 9(21):4701.Google Scholar
• Wei C, Hu P, Tai C, Huang C, Yang C (2008) Managing word mismatch problems in information retrieval: A topic-based query expansion approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(3):269–295.Google Scholar
• Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in Organisations (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Wilson T, Hoffmann P, Somasundaran S, Kessler J, Wiebe J, Choi Y, Cardie C, Riloff E, Patwardhan S (2005) Opinionfinder: A system for subjectivity analysis. Proc. HLT/EMNLP 2005 Interactive Demonstrations (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 34–35.Google Scholar
• Wojcik M (2011) Inventing computational rhetoric. PhD thesis, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
• Xiong G, Bharadwaj S (2013) Asymmetric roles of advertising and marketing capability in financial returns to news: Turning bad into good and into great. Marketing Sci. 75(5):88–104.Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Guo H (2018) Using text mining to compare online pro- and anti-vaccine headlines: Word usage, sentiments, and online popularity. Comm. Stud. 69(1):103–122.Google Scholar
• Zagalsky A, Te’eni D, Yahav I, Schwartz DG, Silverman G, Cohen D, Mann Y, Lewinsky D (2021) The design of reciprocal learning between human and artificial intelligence. Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interaction 5(CSCW2):443.Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Zhao S, Cheung C, Lee M (2014) Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers’ decision-making: A heuristic-systematic model. Decision Support Systems 67:78–89.Google Scholar
• Zhou P, Qi Z, Zheng S, Xu J, Bao H, Xu B (2016) Text classification improved by integrating bidirectional LSTM with two-dimensional max pooling. Proc. COLING 2016 26th Internat. Conf. Comput. Linguistics Tech. Papers (The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee, Osaka, Japan), 3485–3495.Google Scholar