Does Modularity Coordinate? Disentangling Decoupling, Interfaces, and Design Rules via Simon’s Theory of the Artifact

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0444

References

  • Andriani P, Cattani G (2024) Toward an evolutionary theory of shadow options. Organ. Sci. 35(6):2249–2271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C (2023) Design rules: Past and future. Indust. Corporate Change 32(1):11–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C (2024) Design Rules 2: How Technology Shapes Organizations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C, Clark K (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau K (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brusoni S, Henkel J, Jacobides M, Karim S, MacCormack A, Puranam P, Schilling M (2023) The power of modularity today: 20 years of “design rules”. Indust. Corporate Change 32(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cennamo C, Ozalp H, Kretschmer T (2018) Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):461–478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker G (2018) Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):381–400.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Halckenhaeusser A, Forderer J, Heinzl A, Henfridsson O (2026) Strategic drivers of core expansion on software platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 37(2):1222–1241.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howison J, Crowston K (2014) Collaboration through open superposition. MIS Quart. 38(1):29–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu M (2022) Extending digital ventures through templating. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):285–310.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leong C, Lin S, Tan F, Yu J (2024) Coordination in a digital platform organization. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):363–393.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lindberg A, Berente N, Gaskin J, Lyytinen K (2016) Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source project. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):751–772.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Medappa P, Srivastava S (2019) Does superposition influence the success of FLOSS projects? Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):764–786.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Minsky M (2006) The Emotion Machine (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Priego L, Wareham J (2023) From bits to atoms: Open source hardware at CERN. MIS Quart. 47(2):639–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M (2000) Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):312–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
  • Simon H (1996) Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Smith C (1981) A Search for Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2018) Platform synergy: Architectural origins and competitive consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):829–848.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vial G (2023) A complex adaptive systems perspective of software reuse in the digital age. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1728–1743.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wareham J, Fox P, Giner J (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xia Y, Chen H, Fang Y (2026) Third-party software development kit utilization and mobile app market performance. Inform. Systems Res. 37(2):761–781.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.