Response to Entry in Streaming Markets: A Game-Theoretic Model
Published Online:3 Jul 2026https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0577
References
- (2021) The streaming price wars have begun. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.vulture.com/2021/02/streaming-price-wars-customer-churn.html.Google Scholar
- (2022) Revenue-sharing allocation strategies for two-sided media platforms: Pro-rata vs. user-centric. Management Sci. 68(12):8699–8721.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 73:102592.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Multiproduct nonlinear pricing. Econometrica 64(1):51–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. 45(12):1613–1630.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Bundling and competition on the internet. Marketing Sci. 19(1):63–82.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Platform competition with multihoming on both sides: Subsidize or not? Management Sci. 66(12):5599–5607.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Usage-based pricing of software services under competition. J. Revenue Pricing Management 9(3):204–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Pricing information goods: A strategic analysis of the selling and pay-per-use mechanisms. Marketing Sci. 34(2):218–234.Link, Google Scholar
- (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. 75(299):493–517.Google Scholar
- (2004) Economics of an information intermediary with aggregation benefits. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):22–36.Link, Google Scholar
- (2003) Economic of online music. Proc. 5th Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 300–309.Google Scholar
- (2021) Your streaming bill is about to get more expensive as platforms look to gobble up libraries of exclusive content. Business Insider (June 5), https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-mgm-netflix-streaming-content-more-exclusive-consumers-pay-more-2021-6.Google Scholar
- (2024) Estimating demand for subscription products: Identification of willingness to pay without price variation. Marketing Sci. 43(4):797–816.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) 11 of the best Audible originals. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://bookriot.com/best-audible-originals/.Google Scholar
- (2021) Sony Pictures moves movie output deal from Starz to Netflix in rich pact. Variety (April 8), https://variety.com/2021/film/news/netflix-sony-pictures-pay-1-starz-output-1234946413/.Google Scholar
- (2025) Video streaming services stats (2025). Accessed April 5, 2026, https://explodingtopics.com/blog/video-streaming-stats.Google Scholar
- (2024) Top streaming statistics in 2024. Forbes (February 13), https://www.forbes.com/home-improvement/internet/streaming-stats/.Google Scholar
- (2002) Pricing access services. Marketing Sci. 21(2):139–159.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Content proliferation and narrowcasting in the age of streaming media. Production Oper. Management 32(10):3295–3310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) First- or second-mover advantage? The case of IT-enabled platform markets. MIS Quart. 44(3):1107–1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Competitive pricing of information goods: Subscription pricing versus pay-per-use. Econom. Theory 13(2):447–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Pricing on-demand services: Alternative ways of combining usage and access fees. Production Oper. Management 32(1):11–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Using transaction prices to re-examine price dispersion in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):269–288.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Optimal per-use rentals and sales of durable products and their distinct roles in price discrimination. Production Oper. Management 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The framing effects of multipart pricing on consumer purchasing behavior of customized information good bundles. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):334–351.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Sci. 24(3):382–395.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Investing in Netflix: Accounting for content assets. Accounting Perspect. 23(4):585–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Diffusion models for peer-to-peer (P2P) media distribution: On the impact of decentralized, constrained supply. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):271–287.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Streaming wars: Disney+, Netflix and Amazon to drive original content spend. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.fdiintelligence.com/content/c289eccd-15e4-5b19-a821-52bbbf71da79.Google Scholar
- (2021) Compensating online content producers: A theoretical analysis. Management Sci. 67(11):7075–7090.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Streaming’s small fish stay clear of original content rat race. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.livemint.com/industry/media/streamings-small-fish-stay-clear-of-original-content-rat-race-11696185179434.html.Google Scholar
- (2021) The streaming battle lines shift due to catalog conflicts in 2021. Observer (May 5), https://observer.com/2021/05/netflix-amazon-disney-plus-hulu-hbo-max-streaming-wars-update.Google Scholar
- KPMG LLP (2024) Accounting for film and TV content in the age of streaming. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://kpmg.com/kpmg-us/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2024/accounting-film-tv-content-age-streaming.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2026) Boon or bane: Impacts of exclusivity contracts between platforms and content developers. Preprint, submitted January 21, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4551539.Google Scholar
- (2020) The streaming wars and Netflix’s first mover advantage. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://quarterlifeviews.com/2020/01/05/the-streaming-wars-and-netflixs-first-mover-advantage/.Google Scholar
- (2017) Fee or free: When should firms charge for online content? Management Sci. 63(4):1150–1165.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Thumbs up, sales up? The contingent effect of Facebook likes on sales performance in social commerce. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(4):109–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Optimal pricing model of digital music: Subscription, ownership or mixed? Production Oper. Management 29(3):688–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The demand effects of product recommendation networks. MIS Quart. 41(2):397–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):171–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
- MIT SMR Strategy Forum (2023) Have Uber and Netflix lost their first-mover advantage? Accessed April 5, 2026, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/strategy-forum/have-uber-and-netflix-lost-their-first-mover-advantage/.Google Scholar
- (2019) Why is every streaming service using the same pricing model? Harvard Bus. Rev. (November 12), https://hbr.org/2019/11/why-is-every-streaming-service-using-the-same-pricing-model.Google Scholar
- (2023) The basics of film distribution agreements. Forbes (December 7), https://www.forbes.com/sites/schuylermoore/2023/12/07/the-basics-of-film-distribution-agreements/.Google Scholar
- Netflix, Inc. (2016) Form 10-k for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1065280/000106528016000047/nflx201510k.htm.Google Scholar
- Netflix, Inc. (2025) Form 10-k for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1065280/000106528025000044/nflx-20241231.htm.Google Scholar
- (2022) The Great Netflix Correction: Loss of subscribers throws streaming business model into question. Financial Times. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.ft.com/content/0e5038a2-dabd-49d4-a3f9-7685cad18f8c.Google Scholar
- (2012) Underlying consumer heterogeneity in markets for subscription-based IT services with network effects. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1322–1341.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Free versus for-a-fee. MIS Quart. 40(1):31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Content and advertising in the media: Pay-TV versus free-to-air. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(4):949–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Precedence-Research (2023) Video streaming market size to be worth around USD 1,721.4 billion by 2030. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2023/07/18/2706401/0/en/Video-Streaming-Market-Size-to-be-Worth-Around-USD-1-721-4-Billion-by-2030.html/.Google Scholar
- (2016) Competitive bundling in information markets. MIS Quart. 40(1):111–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Usage restriction and subscription services: Operational benefits with rational users. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):429–447.Link, Google Scholar
- ReelGood (2022) Share of exclusive movies and TV shows on major SVoD platforms in the United States in June 2020. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1110900/svod-services-original-content-us/.Google Scholar
- (2023) How Netflix makes money. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://web.archive.org/web/20230927045205/https://www.investopedia.com/insights/how-netflix-makes-money/.Google Scholar
- (2022) New audiobook platforms are launched to rival Amazon’s Audible. The Guardian (October 3), https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/oct/03/new-audiobook-platforms-are-launched-to-rival-amazons-audible.Google Scholar
- (2022) Netflix quietly admits streaming competition is eating into growth. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/20/netflix-quietly-admits-streaming-competition-is-eating-into-growth.html.Google Scholar
- (2025) The 10 best pay per view streaming platforms to launch a PPV website in 2025. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.contus.com/blog/pay-per-view-video-streaming-platforms/.Google Scholar
- Statista (2022) Streaming wars: The value of original content to streaming services. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.statista.com/study/89572/streaming-wars-the-value-of-original-content-to-streaming-services/?srsltid=AfmBOoqoFeUKMANdb6pdawdMdXSQrA5UNHy2vkpaOE-i_gmMFuug1nuC.Google Scholar
- Statista (2023) Video-on-demand average revenue per user (ARPU) in the United States from 2017 to 2027, by type. Accessed April 5, 2026, https://www.statista.com/statistics/459417/digital-video-arpu-type-digital-market-outlook-usa/.Google Scholar
- (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Sci. 50(12):1660–1673.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Perpetual versus subscription licensing under quality uncertainty and network externality effects. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(1):39–68.Crossref, Google Scholar

