How Platform Workers Contest Algorithmic Management: Theorizing the Dynamics of Algoactivistic Practices

References

• Alter S (2014) Theory of workarounds. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 34(55):1041–1066.Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):247–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benlian A, Wiener M, Cram WA, Krasnova H, Maedche A, Möhlmann M, Recker J, Remus U (2022) Algorithmic management. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 64(4):825–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhave DP, Teo LH, Dalal RS (2020) Privacy at work: A review and a research agenda for a contested terrain. J. Management 46(1):127–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braverman H (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (Monthly Review Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Gupta A (2016) Social activism in and around organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):671–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucher E, Schou PK, Waldkirch M (2021) Pacifying the algorithm—Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization 28(1):44–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucher E, Schou PK, Waldkirch M (2024) Just another voice in the crowd? Investigating digital voice formation in the gig economy. Acad. Management Discov. 10(3):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burawoy M (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
• Cameron LD (2024) The making of the “good bad” job: How algorithmic management manufactures consent through constant and confined choices. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(2):458–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron LD, Rahman H (2022) Expanding the locus of resistance: Understanding the co-constitution of control and resistance in the gig economy. Organ. Sci. 33(1):38–58.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlsen HB, Ralund S (2022) Computational grounded theory revisited: From computer-led to computer-assisted text analysis. Big Data Soc. 9(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Chakraborty S, Fulk HK, Lowry PB (2024) The role of dissonant relational multiplexity in information system implementation failures: Insights from a grounded theory approach. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 25(5):1303–1342.Google Scholar
• Constantiou I, Marton A, Tuunainen VK (2017) Four models of sharing economy platforms. MIS Quart. Executive 16(4):231–251.Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (2015) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Cornelissen J, Cholakova M (2021) Profits Uber everything? The gig economy and the morality of category work. Strategic Organ. 19(4):722–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cram WA, Wiener M, Tarafdar M, Benlian A (2022) Examining the impact of algorithmic control on Uber drivers’ technostress. J. Management Inform. Systems 39(2):426–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croidieu G, Kim PH (2018) Labor of love: Amateurs and lay-expertise legitimation in the early U.S. radio field. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curchod C, Patriotta G, Cohen L, Neysen N (2020) Working for an algorithm: Power asymmetries and agency in online work settings. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(3):644–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta N, Rong C, Singh S, Stinshoff C, Iacob N, Natnael S, Nxumalo M, Klimaviciute L (2023) Working without borders: The promise and peril of online gig work. World Bank, Washington, DC (July 24), https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/40066.Google Scholar
• Duggan J, Sherman U, Carbery R, McDonnell A (2020) Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management J. 30(1):114–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmonds WA, Kennedy TD (2016) An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Edwards R (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Edwards S, Johnson J (2024) Uber rideshare lawsuit. Forbes (May 28). https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/product-liability/uber-rideshare-lawsuit/.Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Pachidi S, Sayegh K (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Inform. Organ. 28(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerring J (2017) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Gill MJ (2019) The significance of suffering in organizations: Understanding variation in workers’ responses to multiple modes of control. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):377–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glavin P, Bierman A, Schieman S (2021) Über-alienated: Powerless and alone in the gig economy. Work Occup. 48(4):399–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grootendorst M (2024) BERTopic. Accessed May 21, 2026, https://maartengr.github.io/BERTopic/.Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2020) Unemployment and worker participation in the gig economy: Evidence from an online labor market. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):431–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Hultin L, Introna LD, Göransson MB, Mähring M (2022) Precarity, hospitality, and the becoming of a subject that matters: A study of Syrian refugees in Lebanese tented settlements. Organ. Stud. 43(5):669–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• iPa4Fun (2024) Uber Driver 4.487.10000 for iPhone and iPad. Accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.ipa4fun.com/ipa/88485/.Google Scholar
• Karanović J, Berends H, Engel Y (2021) Regulated dependence: Platform workers’ responses to new forms of organizing. J. Management Stud. 58(4):1070–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Valentine M, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):366–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. 23(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kronblad C, Essén A, Mähring M (2024) When justice is blind to algorithms: Multilayered blackboxing of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector. MIS Quart. 48(4):1637–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulkarni M, Mantere S, Vaara E, van den Broek E, Pachidi S, Glaser VL, Gehman J, et al. (2024) The future of research in an artificial intelligence-driven World. J. Management Inquiry 33(3):207–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee MK, Kusbit D, Metsky E, Dabbish L (2015) Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. Begole B, Kim J, Inkpen K, Woo W, eds. Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Conf. Human Factors Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 1603–1612.Google Scholar
• Li AK (2022) Beyond algorithmic control: Flexibility, intermediaries, and paradox in the on-demand economy. Inform. Comm. Soc. 25(14):2012–2027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindberg A (2020) Developing theory through integrating human and machine pattern recognition. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(1):90–116.Google Scholar
• Lyft (2021) Lyft and Uber launch industry sharing safety program in the US. Lyft News Blog (March 11). https://www.lyft.com/blog/posts/lyft-and-uber-launch-industry-sharing-safety-program-in-the-us.Google Scholar
• Marabelli M, Newell S, Handunge V (2021) The lifecycle of algorithmic decision-making systems: Organizational choices and ethical challenges. J. Strat. Inform. Systems 30(3):101683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDaid E, Andon P, Free C (2023) Algorithmic management and the politics of demand: Control and resistance at Uber. Accounting Organ. Soc. 109:101465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meijerink J, Bondarouk T (2023) The duality of algorithmic management: Toward a research agenda on HRM algorithms, autonomy and value creation. Human Resource Management Rev. 33(1):100876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Henfridsson O (2019) What people hate about being managed by algorithms, according to a study of Uber drivers. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 30). https://hbr.org/2019/08/what-people-hate-about-being-managed-by-algorithms-according-to-a-study-of-uber-drivers.Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Salge CA, Marabelli M (2023) Algorithm sensemaking: How platform workers make sense of algorithmic management. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(1):35–64.Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Zalmanson L, Henfridsson O, Gregory RW (2021) Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. MIS Quart. 45(4):1999–2022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery D (1987) The Fall of the House of Labor (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery T, Baglioni S (2021) Defining the gig economy: Platform capitalism and the reinvention of precarious work. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 41(9–10):1012–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrill C, Zald MN, Rao H (2003) Covert political conflict in organizations: Challenges from below. Annual Rev. Sociol. 29:391–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller F, Weidenstedt L, Bernhard-Oettel C, Eib C (2025) Under my umbrella? Gig workers’ perspectives on career sustainability as employees in Swedish umbrella companies. J. Vocat. Behav. 163:104182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson LK (2020) Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociol. Methods Res. 49(1):3–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newlands G (2020) Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: The organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. Organ. Stud. 42(5):719–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (Crown Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Petriglieri G, Ashford SJ, Wrzesniewski A (2018) Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):124–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahman HA (2021) The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):945–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblat A, Stark L (2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. Int. J. Comm. 10:3758–3784.Google Scholar
• Schmiedel T, Müller O, Vom Brocke J (2018) Topic Modeling as a strategy of inquiry in organizational research: A tutorial with an application example on organizational culture. Organ. Res. Methods 22(4):941–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stelmaszak M, Möhlmann M, Sørensen C (2025) When algorithms delegate to humans: Exploring human-algorithm interaction at Uber. MIS Quart. 49(1):305–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Page X, Marabelli M (2023) Algorithms as co-workers: Human algorithm role interactions in algorithmic work. Inform. Systems J. 33(2):232–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson P, Smith C (2009) Labour power and labour process: Contesting the marginality of the sociology of work. Sociology 43(5):913–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson P, Van den Broek D (2010) Managerial control and workplace regimes: An introduction. Work Employment Soc. 24(3):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uber (2024) Join a fleet in Germany to drive with Uber. Accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.uber.com/de/en/drive/.Google Scholar
• Uzunca B, Rigtering JPC, Ozcan P (2018) Sharing and shaping: A cross-country comparison of how sharing economy firms shape their institutional environment to gain legitimacy. Acad. Management Discov. 4(3):248–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Lin YW, Han W, Qiu L (2025) When gig workers no longer gig: The impact of California Assembly Bill 5 on the online labor market. Inform. Systems Res. 37(2):1337–1350.Google Scholar
• Weber M, Remus U, Geiger M, Cram WA (2026) Between proactive and reactive coping: How food delivery workers cope with algorithmic management threats. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 35(3):375–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Wiener M, Cram WA, Benlian A (2023) Algorithmic control and gig workers: A legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(3):485–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesche M, Jurisch MC, Yetton PW, Krcmar H (2017) Grounded theory methodology in information systems research. MIS Quart. 41(3):685–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood AJ, Graham M, Lehdonvirta V, Hjorth I (2019) Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work Employment Soc. 33(1):56–75.Crossref, Google Scholar