Interlopers or Catalysts? Dissecting the Impact of Incorporating AI Players on Multiplayer Online Games

References

• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(490):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdel-Karim BM, Pfeuffer N, Carl KV, Hinz O (2023) How AI-based systems can induce reflections: The case of AI-augmented diagnostic work. MIS Quart. 47(4):1395–1424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adam M, Roethke K, Benlian A (2023) Human vs. automated sales agents: How and why customer responses shift across sales stages. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):1148–1168.Link, Google Scholar
• Alfaro L, Faia E, Lamersdorf N, Saidi F (2022) Health externalities and policy: The role of social preferences. Management Sci. 68(9):6751–6761.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai X, Marsden JR, Ross WT Jr, Wang G (2020) A note on the impact of daily deals on local retailers’ online reputation: Mediation effects of the consumer experience. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1132–1143.Link, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1989) Human agency in social cognitive theory. Amer. Psych. 44(9):1175–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bavafa H, Hitt LM, Terwiesch C (2018) The impact of e-visits on visit frequencies and patient health: Evidence from primary care. Management Sci. 64(12):5461–5480.Link, Google Scholar
• Bond MH, Leung K, Wan KC (1982) The social impact of self-effacing attributions: The Chinese case. J. Soc. Psych. 118(2):157–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Z, Zhu Y, Li G, Qiu L (2024) Consequences of information feed integration on user engagement and contribution: A natural experiment in an online knowledge-sharing community. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):1114–1136.Link, Google Scholar
• Castelo N, Boegershausen J, Hildebrand C, Henkel AP (2023) Understanding and improving consumer reactions to service bots. J. Consumer Res. 50(4):848–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Chen Y, Wu C (2023) Collaborate to compete: An empirical matching game under incomplete information in rank-order tournaments. Marketing Sci. 42(5):1004–1026.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan J, He S, Qiao D, Whinston A (2024) Shedding light on the dark: The impact of legal enforcement on darknet transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):145–164.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J (2023) Learning and skill set formation: A structural examination of version upgrades, user visibility, and AI strategies. Production Oper. Management 32(12):3856–3872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Roth J (2023) Logs with zeros? Some problems and solutions. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):891–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M, Elmachtoub AN, Lei X (2026) Matchmaking strategies for maximizing player engagement in video games. Management Sci. Forthcoming. Google Scholar
• Chen J, He S, Yang X (2024) Platform loophole exploitation, recovery measures, and user engagement: A quasi-natural experiment in online gaming. Inform. Systems Res. 35(4):1609–1633.Link, Google Scholar
• Compeau D, Higgins CA, Huff S (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quart. 23(2):145–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Chaisemartin C, d’Haultfoeuille X (2020) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(9):2964–2996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedmon T (2018) PUBG’s developer API is good news for both devs and players. Comicbook (March 14), https://comicbook.com/gaming/news/pubg-developer-api-good-news-for-devs-and-players/.Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Lakhiwal A, Sachdeva A (2023) AI agents as team members: Effects on satisfaction, conflict, trustworthiness, and willingness to work with. J. Management Inform. Systems 40(2):307–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deshpande M, Li Y (2019) Who is screened out? Application costs and the targeting of disability programs. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 11(4):213–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eftekhari S, Yaraghi N, Gopal RD, Ramesh R (2023) Impact of health information exchange adoption on referral patterns. Management Sci. 69(3):1615–1638.Link, Google Scholar
• Fan W, Zhou Q, Qiu L, Kumar S (2023) Should doctors open online consultation services? An empirical investigation of their impact on offline appointments. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):629–651.Link, Google Scholar
• Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2021) Will humans-in-the-loop become borgs? Merits and pitfalls of working with AI. MIS Quart. 45(3):1527–1556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):678–696.Link, Google Scholar
• Ge R, Zheng Z, Tian X, Liao L (2021) Human–robot interaction: When investors adjust the usage of robo-advisors in peer-to-peer lending. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):774–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Gnewuch U, Morana S, Hinz O, Kellner R, Maedche A (2024) More than a bot? The impact of disclosing human involvement on customer interactions with hybrid service agents. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):936–955.Link, Google Scholar
• Gonçalves D, Pais P, Gerling K, Guerreiro T, Rodrigues A (2023) Social gaming: A systematic review. Comput. Human Behav. 147:107851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong M, Wagner C, Ali A (2024) The impact of social network embeddedness on mobile massively multiplayer online games play. Inform. Systems J. 34(2):327–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman LA (1961) Snowball sampling. Ann. Math. Statist. 32(1):148–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econom. 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo H, Hao L, Mukhopadhyay T, Sun D (2019) Selling virtual currency in digital games: Implications for gameplay and social welfare. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):430–446.Link, Google Scholar
• Hadji-Vasilev A (2024) 23 video game and online gaming statistics, facts & trends for 2024. Accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.cloudwards.net/online-gaming-statistics/.Google Scholar
• Hamari J, Keronen L (2017) Why do people play games? A meta-analysis. Internat. J. Inform. Management 37(3):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han E, Yin D, Zhang H (2023) Bots with feelings: Should AI agents express positive emotion in customer service? Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):1296–1311.Link, Google Scholar
• He Y, Xu X, Huang N, Hong Y, Liu D (2025) Enhancing user privacy through ephemeral sharing design: Experimental evidence from online dating. Inform. Systems Res. 36(1):162–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Higham M (2017) PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds review. Accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/playerunknowns-battlegrounds-review/1900-6416830/.Google Scholar
• Hossam M (2020) PUBG Update 7.1 adds bots to public games to balance skill gap. Accessed May 5, 2025, https://techraptor.net/gaming/news/pubg-update-71-adds-bots-to-lower-skill-gap-between-veterans-and-newbies.Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Jasin S, Manchanda P (2019) “Level up”: Leveraging skill and engagement to maximize player game-play in online video games. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):927–947.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Zhang J, Burtch G, Li X, Chen P (2021) Combating procrastination on massive online open courses via optimal calls to action. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):301–317.Link, Google Scholar
• Huber SE, Cortez R, Kiili K, Lindstedt A, Ninaus M (2023) Game elements enhance engagement and mitigate attrition in online learning tasks. Comput. Human Behav. 149:107948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Xu SX, Xu Y, Zhang N (2018) The needs–affordances–features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quart. 42(3):737–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana S, Qiu L, Kumar S (2019) When a doctor knows, it shows: An empirical analysis of doctors’ responses in a Q&A forum of an online healthcare portal. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):872–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim JE, Tsvetkova M (2022) Cheating in online gaming spreads through observation and victimization. Network Sci. 9(4):425–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krafton Inc (2024) PUBG: Battlegrounds 2024 roadmap. Accessed May 5, 2025, https://pubg.com/en-na/news/7082.Google Scholar
• League of Legends Wiki (2025) Co-op vs. AI. Accessed May 5, 2025, https://wiki.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/Co-op_vs._AI.Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Levina N, Lifshitz-Assaf H (2021) Is AI ground truth really true? The dangers of training and evaluating AI tools based on experts’ know-what. MIS Quart. 45(3):1501–1526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li M, Suh A (2021) We-intention to continue playing mobile multiplayer games: The role of social play habit. Internet Res. 31(4):1153–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang C, Wu J, Li X (2024) Do “likes” in a brand community always make you buy more? Inform. Systems Res. 35(4):1681–1700.Link, Google Scholar
• Lindsey K (2024) How AI will impact gaming. Accessed May 5, 2025, https://www.wwt.com/blog/how-ai-will-impact-gaming.Google Scholar
• Liu D, Li X, Santhanam R (2013) Digital games and beyond: What happens when players compete? MIS Quart. 37(1):111–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu L, Wang Y, Xu Y (2024) A practical guide to counterfactual estimators for causal inference with time‐series cross‐sectional data. Amer. J. Political Sci. 68(1):160–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Tong S, Fang Z, Qu Z (2019) Frontiers: Machines vs. humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Sci. 38(6):937–947.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Mai Y, Hu B (2023) Optimizing free-to-play multiplayer games with premium subscription. Management Sci. 69(6):3437–3456.Link, Google Scholar
• Mende M, Scott ML, van Doorn J, Grewal D, Shanks I (2019) Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses. J. Marketing Res. 56(4):535–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meng Z, Hao L, Tan Y (2021) Freemium pricing in digital games with virtual currency. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):481–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Mezulis AH, Abramson LY, Hyde JS, Hankin BL (2004) Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psych. Bull. 130(5):711–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Phelps CC (1999) Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad. Management J. 42(4):403–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Overwatch Wiki (2023) Practice vs. AI. Accessed May 5, 2025, https://overwatch.fandom.com/wiki/Practice_vs._AI.Google Scholar
• PR Newswire (2023) AI in video games market to reach $11.4 billion, globally, by 2032 at 26.8%% CAGR: Allied Market Research. Accessed May 5, 2025, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ai-video-games-market-reach-071000146.html.Google Scholar
• Qiu L (2026a) When social technology meets artificial intelligence: Foundations, transformations, and a research agenda. Artificial Intelligence Machine Learn. Robotics Bus. 2(1):24–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiu L (2026b) AI-Empowered Corporate Social Media: Exploring Internal and External Strategy, New Perspectives in Organizational Communication (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Liu D, Shen WCM (2016) Research note—Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):453–465.Link, Google Scholar
• Song T, Tang Q, Huang J (2019) Triadic closure, homophily, and reciprocation: An empirical investigation of social ties between content providers. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):912–926.Link, Google Scholar
• Sturm T, Gerlach JP, Pumplun L, Mesbah N, Peters F, Tauchert C, Nan N, Buxmann P (2021) Coordinating human and machine learning for effective organizational learning. MIS Quart. 45(3):1581–1602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun L, Abraham S (2021) Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. J. Econom. 225(2):175–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uludağlı MÇ, Oğuz K (2023) Non-player character decision-making in computer games. Artificial Intelligence Rev. 56:14159–14191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villareale J, Maram SS, Seif El-Nasr M, Zhu J (2023) Integrating players’ perspectives in AI-based games: Case studies of player-AI interaction design. Lopes P, Luz F, Liapis A, Engström H, eds. FDG’23: Proc. 18th Internat. Conf. Foundations Digital Games (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Wang W, Gao G, Agarwal R (2024a) Friend or foe? Teaming between artificial intelligence and workers with variation in experience. Management Sci. 70(9):5753–5775.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Qiu L, Xu W (2024b) Informal payments and doctor engagement in an online health community: An empirical investigation using generalized synthetic control. Inform. Systems Res. 35(2):706–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang L, Lowry PB, Luo X, Li H (2023) Moving consumers from free to fee in platform-based markets: An empirical study of multiplayer online battle arena games. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):275–296.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang L, Huang N, He Y, Liu D, Guo X, Sun Y, Chen G (2025) Artificial intelligence (AI) assistant in online shopping: A randomized field experiment on a livestream selling platform. Inform. Systems Res. 36(4):2358–2374.Google Scholar
• Xu Y (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Anal. 25(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang QF, Lian LW, Zhao JH (2023) Developing a gamified artificial intelligence educational robot to promote learning effectiveness and behavior in laboratory safety courses for undergraduate students. Internat. J. Ed. Tech. Higher Ed. 20(1):18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yokoi R, Nakayachi K (2025) Human motivation in competition against artificial intelligence: Using one-to-one games. Internat. J. Human–Comput. Interaction 41(4):2198–2210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Phang CW, Wu Q, Luo X (2017) Nonlinear effects of social connections and interactions on individual goal attainment and spending: Evidences from online gaming markets. J. Marketing 81(6):132–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Wang Q, Qiu L, Wang N (2025) Unveiling the cost of free: How an ad-sponsored model affects serialized digital content creation. Inform. Systems Res. 36(2):962–982.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Lynch JG Jr, Chen Q (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):197–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Yang S, Shum M, Dutta S (2022) A dynamic model of player level-progression decisions in online gaming. Management Sci. 68(11):8062–8082.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Duan W (2016) Do professional reviews affect online user choices through user reviews? An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):202–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Gong Y, Qiu L, Kumar A (2026) Economics of smart products with machine learning. Production Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print May 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478261451549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Yan L, Wang Y, Tan Y (2022) Turn your online weight management from zero to hero: A multidimensional, continuous-time evaluation. Management Sci. 68(5):3507–3527.Link, Google Scholar