When Behavioral Data Betray Users: A Diagnostic and Protective Framework Against Social Interaction Leakages

References

• Abbasi A, Dobolyi D, Vance A, Zahedi FM (2021) The phishing funnel model: A design artifact to predict user susceptibility to phishing websites. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):410–436.Link, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Taylor C, Wagman L (2016) The economics of privacy. J. Econom. Literature 54(2):442–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmed F, Liu AX, Jin R (2020) Publishing social network graph eigenspectrum with privacy guarantees. IEEE Trans. Network Sci. Engrg. 7(2):892–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson R, Moore T (2006) The economics of information security. Science 314(5799):610–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Ballester C, Calvó-Armengol A, Zenou Y (2006) Who’s who in networks. Wanted: The key player. Econometrica 74(5):1403–1417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belo R, Ferreira P (2022) Free-riding in products with positive network externalities: Empirical evidence from a large mobile network. MIS Quart. 46(1):401–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bi X, Shen X (2023) Distribution-invariant differential privacy. J. Econom. 235(2):444–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biczók G, Chia PH (2013) Interdependent privacy: Let me share your data. Sadeghi A-R, ed. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, FC 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7859 (Springer, Berlin), 338–353.Google Scholar
• Bramoullé Y, Kranton R, D’Amours M (2014) Strategic interaction and networks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(3):898–930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JL, Martin PR, Sprinkle GB, Way D (2023) How return on investment and residual income performance measures and risk preferences affect risk-taking. Management Sci. 69(2):1301–1322.Link, Google Scholar
• Candogan O, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2012) Optimal pricing in networks with externalities. Oper. Res. 60(4):883–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Cao Z, Hui KL, Xu H (2018) An economic analysis of peer disclosure in online social communities. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):546–566.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi BC, Jiang Z, Xiao B, Kim SS (2015) Embarrassing exposures in online social networks: An integrated perspective of privacy invasion and relationship bonding. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):675–694.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung FRK (1997) Spectral Graph Theory (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI).Google Scholar
• Crandall DJ, Backstrom L, Cosley D, Suri S, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J (2010) Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(52):22436–22441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremonini M, Martini P (2005) Evaluating information security investments from attackers’ perspective: The return-on-attack (ROA). Proc. 4th Annual Workshop Econom. Inform. Security WEIS 2005 (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA). Google Scholar
• Du X, Su M, Zhang X, Zheng X (2017) Bidding for multiple keywords in sponsored search advertising: Keyword categories and match types. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):711–722.Link, Google Scholar
• Dwork C (2006) Differential privacy. Bugliesi M, Preneel B, Sassone V, Wegener I, eds. Automata, Languages, and Programming. ICALP 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4052 (Springer, Berlin), 1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwork C, Roth A (2014) The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations Trends Theoret. Comput. Sci. 9(3–4):211–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwork C, Smith A (2010) Differential privacy for statistics: What we know and what we want to learn. J. Privacy Confidentiality 1(2), https://doi.org/10.29012/jpc.v1i2.570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dwork C, McSherry F, Nissim K, Smith A (2006) Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. Halevi S, Rabin T, eds. Theory of Cryptography. TCC 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3876 (Springer, Berlin), 265–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elinas P, Bonilla EV, Tiao L (2020) Variational inference for graph convolutional networks in the absence of graph data and adversarial settings. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 33 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, New York), 18648–18660.Google Scholar
• Fainmesser IP, Galeotti A, Momot R (2023) Digital privacy. Management Sci. 69(6):3157–3173.Link, Google Scholar
• Fallah A, Makhdoumi A, Malekian A, Ozdaglar A (2024) Optimal and differentially private data acquisition: Central and local mechanisms. Oper. Res. 72(3):1105–1123.Link, Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation (2020) 2020 Internet crime report (March 17), https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2020_IC3Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federal Bureau of Investigation (2023) 2023 Internet crime report. Accessed April 1, 2025, https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2023_IC3Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission (2019) FTC sues Cambridge Analytica, settles with former CEO and app developer. Accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-sues-cambridge-analytica-settles-former-ceo-app-developer.Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2008) Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9(3):432–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galeotti A, Golub B, Goyal S (2020) Targeting interventions in networks. Econometrica 88(6):2445–2471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia D (2017) Leaking privacy and shadow profiles in online social networks. Sci. Adv. 3(8):e1701172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garcia D (2019) Privacy beyond the individual. Nature Human Behav. 3(2):112–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg V, Jaakkola T (2017) Local aggregative games. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, New York), 5347–5357.Google Scholar
• Ghoshal A, Honorio J (2018) Learning sparse polymatrix games in polynomial time and sample complexity. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence Statist., Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 84 (PMLR, New York), 1486–1494. Google Scholar
• Ghoshal A, Hao J, Menon S, Sarkar S (2020) Hiding sensitive information when sharing distributed transactional data. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):473–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Que VF (2023) The economics of digital privacy. Annual Rev. Econom. 15:267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldman ZK, McCoy D (2016) Deterring financially motivated cybercrime. J. National Security Law Policy 8(3):1.Google Scholar
• Gopal RD, Qiao X, Strub MS, Yang Z (2025) Gaining a seat at the table: Enhancing the attractiveness of online lending for institutional investors. Inform. Systems Res. 36(1):326–343.Link, Google Scholar
• Gorski J, Pfeuffer F, Klamroth K (2007) Biconvex sets and optimization with biconvex functions: A survey and extensions. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 66(3):373–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han X, Wang L, Fan W (2021) Is hidden safe? Location protection against machine-learning prediction attacks in social networks. MIS Quart. 45(2):821–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastings M, Falk BH, Tsoukalas G (2023) Privacy-preserving network analytics. Management Sci. 69(9):5482–5500.Link, Google Scholar
• Heffetz O, Ligett K (2014) Privacy and data-based research. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(2):75–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honorio J, Ortiz LE (2015) Learning the structure and parameters of large-population graphical games from behavioral data. J. Machine Learn. Res. 16(1):1157–1210.Google Scholar
• Hu H, Ahn GJ, Zhao Z, Yang D (2014) Game theoretic analysis of multiparty access control in online social networks. Proc. 19th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models and Tech. (SACMAT ’14) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 93–102.Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Gu B, Hong Y, Liang C, Wang K, Fu D, Yang B (2019) Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Sci. 65(1):327–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Irfan M, Ortiz L (2014) On influence, stable behavior, and the most influential individuals in networks: A game-theoretic approach. Artificial Intelligence 215:79–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2019) The friendship paradox and systematic biases in perceptions and social norms. J. Political Econom. 127(2):777–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO, Zenou Y (2015) Games on networks. Young HP, Zamir S, eds. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 95–163.Google Scholar
• Jackson MO, Rogers BW, Zenou Y (2017) The economic consequences of social-network structure. J. Econom. Literature 55(1):49–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ji S, Li W, Mittal P, Hu X, Beyah R (2015) SecGraph: A uniform and open-source evaluation system for graph data anonymization and de-anonymization. 24th USENIX Security Sympos. (USENIX Security 15) (USENIX Association, Washington, DC), 303–318.Google Scholar
• Kearns M, Littman M, Singh S (2001) Graphical models for game theory. Proc. 17th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (UAI'01) (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA), 253–260.Google Scholar
• Kipf TN, Welling M (2016) Variational graph auto-encoders. Preprint, submitted November 21, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07308.Google Scholar
• Kipf T, Fetaya E, Wang KC, Welling M, Zemel R (2018) Neural relational inference for interacting systems. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 80 (PMLR, New York), 2688–2697.Google Scholar
• Koller D, Friedman N (2009) Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Singh SS, Singh K, Biswas B (2020) Link prediction techniques, applications, and performance: A survey. Physica A 553:124289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lake L (2018) Spear phishing scammers want more from you. Accessed August 10, 2023, http://consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2018/10/spear-phishing-scammers-want-more-you.Google Scholar
• Lake B, Tenenbaum J (2010) Discovering structure by learning sparse graphs. Proc. 32nd Annual Meeting Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX), 778–784.Google Scholar
• Leng Y, Ruiz R, Liu X (2026) Interpretable recommendations and parameter-grounded explanations with multi-graph attention. Inform. Systems Res. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Leng Y, Dong X, Moro E, Pentland A (2024a) Long-range social influence in phone communication networks on offline adoption decisions. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):318–338.Link, Google Scholar
• Leng Y, Dong X, Wu J, Pentland A (2020) Learning quadratic games on networks. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 119 (PMLR, New York), 5820–5830.Google Scholar
• Leng Y, Sowrirajan T, Zhai Y, Pentland A (2024b) Interpretable stochastic block influence model: Measuring social influence among homophilous communities. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 36(2):708–714.Google Scholar
• Liu P, Xu Y, Jiang Q, Tang Y, Guo Y, Wang L, Li X (2020) Local differential privacy for social network publishing. Neurocomputing 391:273–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lü L, Zhou T (2011) Link prediction in complex networks: A survey. Physica A 390(6):1150–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martínez V, Berzal F, Cubero JC (2016) A survey of link prediction in complex networks. ACM Comput. Surveys 49(4):69.Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meinshausen N, Bühlmann P (2006) High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso. Ann. Statist. 34(3):1436–1462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon S, Sarkar S (2007) Minimizing information loss and preserving privacy. Management Sci. 53(1):101–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Menon S, Sarkar S (2016) Privacy and big data. MIS Quart. 40(4):963–982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Shmatikov V (2009) De-anonymizing social networks. Proc. 30th IEEE Sympos. Security Privacy (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 173–187.Google Scholar
• Ortega A, Frossard P, Kovačević J, Moura JMF, Vandergheynst P (2018) Graph signal processing: Overview, challenges and applications. Proc. IEEE 106(5):808–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsitsiklis J, Xu K, Xu Z (2018) Private sequential learning. Proc. 31st Conf. Learn. Theory (PMLR, New York), 721–727.Google Scholar
• Twitter (2020) An update on our security incident. Accessed August 10, 2023, https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/an-update-on-our-security-incident.Google Scholar
• Xu H, Dinev T (2022) Guest editorial: Reflections on the 2021 impact award: Why privacy still matters. MIS Quart. 46(4):xx–xxxii. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Chen J, Gao T, Yu M (2019) DAG-GNN: Dag structure learning with graph neural networks. Proc. 36th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., vol. 97 (PMLR, New York), 7154–7163.Google Scholar
• Yu L, Motipalli SM, Lee D, Liu P, Xu H, Liu Q, Tan J, Luo B (2018) My friend leaks my privacy: Modeling and analyzing privacy in social networks. Proc. 23rd ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (SACMAT ’18) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 93–104.Google Scholar
• Zahedi FM, Chen Y, Zhao H (2024) Ontology-based intelligent interface personalization for protection against phishing attacks. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):1463–1478.Link, Google Scholar
• Zamost S, Khorram Y (2022) FBI says fraud on linkedin a ‘significant threat’ to platform and consumers. Accessed August 10, 2023, https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/17/fbi-says-fraud-on-linkedin-a-significant-threat-to-platform-and-consumers.html.Google Scholar
• Zhang NA, Wang CA, Karahanna E, Xu Y (2022) Peer privacy concern: Conceptualization and measurement. MIS Quart. 46(1):491–530.Crossref, Google Scholar