Left-Digit Bias, Quality Choice, and Channel Coordination

References

• Amaldoss W, Shin W (2015) Multitier store brands and channel profits. J. Marketing Res. 52(6):754–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu K (1997) Why are so many goods priced to end in nine? And why this practice hurts the producers. Econom. Lett. 54(1):41–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busse MR, Lacetera N, Pope DG, Silva-Risso J, Sydnor JR (2013) Estimating the effect of salience in wholesale and retail car markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(3):575–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chehrazi N, Sanders RE, Stamatopoulos I (2025) Inventory information frictions explain price rigidity in perishable groceries. Marketing Sci. 44(2):411–436.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J (2023) Evaluating the ending-9 pricing strategy along the online shopping funnel. Production Oper. Management 32(11):3469–3483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, Marmorstein H, Tsiros M, Rao AR (2012) When more is less: The impact of base value neglect on consumer preferences for bonus packs over price discounts. J. Marketing 76(4):64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlon CT, Rao NL (2020) Discrete prices and the incidence and efficiency of excise taxes. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 12(4):111–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Mallucci P (2016) Fairness ideals in distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 53(6):969–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diao W, Harutyunyan M, Jiang B (2023) Consumer fairness concerns and dynamic pricing in a channel. Marketing Sci. 42(3):569–588.Link, Google Scholar
• Dolan RJ (1987) Quantity discounts: Managerial issues and research opportunities. Marketing Sci. 6(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Evangelidis I (2024) Frontiers: Shrinkflation aversion: When and why product size decreases are seen as more unfair than equivalent price increases. Marketing Sci. 43(2):280–288.Link, Google Scholar
• Foros Ø, Kind HJ, Shaffer GE (2021) Less is more in bilateral channel coordination? Linear wholesale pricing may outperform more complex contracts. Working paper, Centre for Applied Research at NHH, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz J, Thisse JF (1979) Price competition, quality and income disparities. J. Econom. Theory 20(3):340–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geylani T, Dukes AJ, Srinivasan K (2007) Strategic manufacturer response to a dominant retailer. Marketing Sci. 26(2):164–178.Link, Google Scholar
• Hodges BT, Chen H (2022) In the eye of the beholder: The interplay of numeracy and fluency in consumer response to 99-ending prices. J. Consumer Res. 48(6):1050–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Villas-Boas JM (2003) A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 40(1):80–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S, Chen H (2023) Sunk cost bias and time inconsistency: A strategic analysis of pricing decisions. Management Sci. 69(4):2383–2400.Link, Google Scholar
• Janssen A, Kasinger J (2026) Shrinkflation and consumer demand. Marketing Sci. 45(1):142–158.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeuland AP, Shugan SM (1983) Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. 2(3):239–272.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z (2022) An empirical bargaining model with left-digit bias: A study on auto loan monthly payments. Management Sci. 68(1):442–465.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Malkoc SA, Goodman JK (2022) The threshold-crossing effect: Just-below pricing discourages consumers to upgrade. J. Consumer Res. 48(6):1096–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knotek ES II (2024) The roles of price points and menu costs in price rigidity. J. Monetary Econom. 145:103559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft A, Rao R (2026) Market effects of inattention: Theory and evidence from left-digit bias. J. Marketing Res.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2012) Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2206–2236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laurent G, Vanhuele M (2023) How do consumers read and encode a price? J. Consumer Res. 50(3):510–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenkovskaya M, Sweldens S (2025) How numerical cognition explains ambiguity aversion. J. Consumer Res. 51(6):1120–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy D, Bergen M, Dutta S, Venable R (1997) The magnitude of menu costs: Direct evidence from large U.S. supermarket chains. Quart. J. Econom. 112(3):791–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy D, Lee D, Chen H, Kauffman RJ, Bergen M (2011) Price points and price rigidity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(4):1417–1431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Li X (2023) The bright side of inequity aversion. Management Sci. 69(7):4210–4227.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Li Y, Shi M (2019) Managing consumer deliberations in a decentralized distribution channel. Marketing Sci. 38(1):170–190.Link, Google Scholar
• List JA, Muir I, Pope D, Sun G (2023) Left-digit bias at Lyft. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(6):3186–3237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McShane BB, Chen C, Anderson ET, Simester DI (2016) Decision stages and asymmetries in regular retail price pass-through. Marketing Sci. 35(4):619–639.Link, Google Scholar
• Meng CC (2023) The price paid: Heuristic thinking and biased reference points in the housing market. J. Urban Econom. 134:103514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miklós-Thal J, Shaffer G (2021) Pass-through as an economic tool: On exogenous competition, social incidence, and price discrimination. J. Political Econom. 129(1):323–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1984) Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci. 3(4):288–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1988) Strategic decentralization in channels. Marketing Sci. 7(4):335–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Schindler RM, Kirby PN (1997) Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: Implications for nine-ending effects. J. Consumer Res. 24(2):192–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sokolova T, Seenivasan S, Thomas M (2020) The left-digit bias: When and why are consumers penny wise and pound foolish? J. Marketing Res. 57(4):771–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strulov-Shlain A (2023) More than a penny’s worth: Left-digit bias and firm pricing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2612–2645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Morwitz V (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):54–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weng ZK (1995) Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Management Sci. 41(9):1509–1522.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu F, Swait J, Chen Y (2019) Feature-based attributes and the roles of consumers’ perception bias and inference in choice. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 36(2):325–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao J, Oppewal H, Wang D (2020) Cheaper and smaller or more expensive and larger: How consumers respond to unit price increase tactics that simultaneously change product price and package size. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 48(6):1075–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhong Z (2022) Chasing diamonds and crowns: Consumer limited attention and seller response. Management Sci. 68(6):4380–4397.Link, Google Scholar